and exponential models do not qualified because
they have values above 10%.
Figure 3: Above ground carbon distribution in Wildlife
reserve of KGLTL in 2018
Based on the results of statistical test of models
and validation tests, the linear model is the best
model that can be used to estimate the distribution of
above ground carbon in Wildlife reserve of KGLTL.
The results of above ground carbon distribution in
Wildlife reserve of KGLTL can be seen in Figure 3.
Based on the linear regression model, distribution of
above ground carbon in Wildlife reserve of KGLTL
can be classified into 3 classes: class < 50 (ton/ha)
covered 1,863.63 ha, class 50 -75 (ton/ha) covered
3,396.43 ha and > 75 (ton/ha) covered 3,581.82 ha.
This study resulted high correlation between
NDVI and field biomass and have good correlations
between vegetation indices and field biomass
according to another research(Wicaksono et al.,
2011 and Hamdan et al., 2013).The similarity of the
characteristicsof research location may be one of the
causes. Meanwhile, the empirical algorithm is
usually site specific that might not be applicable at
different part, even in the same country (Winarso et
al., 2015).
4 CONCLUSIONS
The utilization of NDVI on Landsat 8 satellite
imagery can be used to estimate the above ground
carbon distribution in Wildlife reserve of KGLTL.
The best regression model for estimating above
ground carbon distribution in Wildlife reserve of
KGLTL is linear regression model with R² value of
68.48%. Wildlife reserve of KGLTL has above
ground carbon stock level between 10.71 to 122.10
ton/ha.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This study was partly supported by an TALENTA
Grant 2018 (No. 414/UN5.2.3.1/PPM/KP-
TALENTA USU/2018) from the Universitas
Sumatera Utara, Ministry of Research, Technology
and Higher Education, Republic of Indonesia.
REFERENCES
Barbier, E.B., Koch, E.W., Silliman, B.R., Hacker, S.D.,
Wolanski, E., Primavera, J., Reed, D.J., 2008. Coastal
Ecosystem Based Management with Nonlinear
Ecological Functions and Values. Science 319 (5861):
321-323.DOI: 10.1126/science.1150349.
Basyuni, M., Sulistiyono, N., 2018. Deforestation and
reforestation analysis from land-use changes in North
Sumatran Mangroves, 1990-2015.IOP Conf. Series:
Materials Science and Engineering 309 (2018)
012018. doi:10.1088/1757-899X/309/1/012018.
Donato, D.C., Kauffman, J.B., Murdiyarso, D., Kurnianto,
S., Stidham, M.,Kanninen., M., 2011.Mangroves
among the most karbon-rich forests in the tropics,
Nature Geoscience, 4(5), 293-297.
Hamdan O., Khairunnisa M.R., Ammar A.A., Hasmadi
I.M., Aziz H.K., 2013. Mangrove Carbon Stock
Assessment by Optical Satellite Imagery.Journal of
Tropical Forest Science 25(4): 554–565.
Komiyama, A., Poungparn,S., Kato, S., 2005. Common
allometric equations for estimating the tree weight of
mangroves. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 21(04), 471-
477.
Mcleod, E., Chmura, G.L., Bouillon, S., Salm, R., Björk,
M., Duarte, C.M., Silliman, B.R., 2011. A Blueprint
for Blue Carbon: 4 Toward an Improved
Understanding of the Role of Vegetated Coastal
Habitats in Sequestering CO2. Frontiers in Ecology
and the Environment 9(10): 552-560.
Wicaksono, P., Danoedoro, P., Hartono, H., Nehren, U.,
Ribbe, L., 2011. Preliminary Work of Mangrove
Ecosystem Carbon Stock Mapping in Small Island
Using Remote Sensing: Above and Below Ground
Carbon Stock Mapping on Medium Resolution
Satellite Image. Remote Sensing for Agriculture,
Ecosystems, and Hydrology XIII, 8174, 81741B–
81741B–10. https://doi.org/ 10.1117/12.897926.
Winarso, G., Vetrita, Y., Purwanto, A.D., Anggraini, N.,
Darmawan, S., Yuwono, D.M., 2015. Mangrove
Above Ground Biomass Estimation Using
Combination of Landsat 8 And
AlosPalsarData.International Journal of Remote
Sensing and Earth Sciences Vol. 12 No. 2 December
2015: 85 – 96.