Student’s Perspectives Concerning the Use of Social Media as
Communication and Educational Tools in a Tertiary Environment
Uwe Terton
1
, Irene Visser
1
, Cindy Davis
1
, Karen Sutherland
1
, Alix Stubbs
1
and Maureen O’Neil
2
1
Arts Research in the Creative Humanities, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore, Australia
2
Faculty of Education and Research, Australian Catholic University, Banyo, Australia
Keywords: Social Media, Blended Learning, Real-life University Students, Communication, Engagement, Community.
Abstract: Social media is currently being used to effectively engage and communicate with students in universities
across the globe. As Beidelman (2015, p.1) acknowledges, Social media is a tool that teachers can use to
make their classroom more engaging, relevant and culturally diverse”. This action research project is
entitled Increasing student engagement and community via the integration of social media technologies to
enhance/inform blended learning at University”, and was funded by a University Exploratory and
Enhancement Learning and Teaching Grant. This paper focuses on the first phase of a two-phase project.
The overall purpose of the project was to explore whether a blended learning approach, that combines the
University’s existing Learning Management System (LMS) with social media applications, strengthens the
quality of teaching, and therefore enhances the level of student learning, engagement and community. The
first research phase constituted an online survey, distributed to 647 students within six University
disciplines and investigates university students’ perspectives and attitudes in relation to the use of social
media as a pedagogical tool. Respondents reported varying views on the issue. The overarching positive
themes were: communication, connection and engagement. Neutral themes included: the win/lose situation
and social media being a supplement to teaching. Negative themes comprised: distraction, poor use of time
and face-to-face being a more appropriate form of learning. A small proportion of respondents reported
having no opinion on the matter and one student raised the need for students to increase their social media
usage in the higher education setting.
1 INTRODUCTION &
BACKGROUND
Over the last decade, there has been significant
growth in the use of social media tools within all
levels of the blended learning and teaching realm
(Beidelman, 2015). There appears to be a climate of
enthusiasm to utilse social media technologies that
have the potential to improve communication and
facilitate student learning (Blankenship, 2010).
Millea, Green and Putland (2005) describe the
current cohort of students as ‘Digital Backpackers’,
who carry a multitude of convergent devices that
keep them continually connected. There is also an
acknowledgement among educators that ‘Net
Geners’ (the Internet Generation) interact and learn
differently from their predecessors in that they have
distinctive methods of thinking, interacting,
communicating and engaging with course content,
and with each other (Bosch, 2009; Cao & Hong,
2011). It is therefore in the best interests of higher
education to uncover ways in which technology can
be “utilised to take advantage of existing student
skills and preferences” (Velliaris et al., 2012, p.25).
There is also strong evidence to support how social
media can facilitate the creation of Personal
Learning Environments (PLEs) which help learners
aggregate and share their learning achievements,
participate in collective knowledge generation and
manage the development of meaning from their
studies (Dabbaghi, & Kitsantas, 2010). Despite this,
some academics have raised concerns relating to
privacy issues and the integrity of teaching content
delivered to students (Moran, 2011; Ishizuka, 2010).
Overall, the literature suggests that social media is
increasingly being used as a tool to develop both
formal and informal learning spaces and
experiences, that begin as an individual learning
Terton, U., Visser, I., Davis, C., Sutherland, K., Stubbs, A. and O’Neil, M.
Student’s Perspectives Concerning the Use of Social Media as Communication and Educational Tools in a Tertiary Environment.
DOI: 10.5220/0006530403470352
In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Computer Supported Education (CSEDU 2018), pages 347-352
ISBN: 978-989-758-291-2
Copyright
c
2019 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved
347
platform or PLE and enable individual knowledge
management and construction. Subsequently social
media is also evolving into a learning platform
where knowledge is socially mediated (Dabbaghi &
Kitsantas, 2010; Jones, 2002; Cych, 2006) and
communication is enhanced (Frand, 2000).
After reviewing the literature, it became apparent
there is a scarcity of research that explores
university students’ perceptions and attitudes
regarding the use of social media as a pedagogical
tool. This knowledge gap led to the development of
the following research question:
RQ1. How do university students feel about using
social media as part of their university course?
2 METHODOLOGY
This paper focuses on the first phase of a two-phase
action research project undertaken in a university in
Queensland, Australia. The purpose of the overall
project was to explore whether a blended learning
approach that combines the University’s existing
Learning Management System (LMS), Blackboard,
with social media applications, would strengthen
the quality of teaching and therefore, enhance the
level of student learning, engagement and
community.
In order to improve the transformation of
research knowledge to everyday educational
practices within tertiary education, a pilot action
research project was undertaken that embedded
social media into real-life teaching settings.
The project was executed in iterative research
cycles, leading to continuous improvements; this
also ensured that the research team was able to react
flexibly to new or changed requirements.
An online survey was used to gather data
regarding students’ perceptions and attitudes about
the use of social media within their courses, as well
as other information regarding how students access
and use social media and the platforms they use.
This paper predominantly focuses on the
responses to question six from the survey (How do
you feel about using social media as part of a
university course?) because it directly addresses the
research question. This approach was adopted
because the authors felt it was imperative to gauge
the impact, on students, of using social media in the
classroom prior to recommending its use to other
academics across the wider institution.
The survey collected both quantitative and
qualitative data.
Phase One an online survey was distributed to
647 students undertaking the following courses:
Authors Public Relations: Contemporary
Perspectives
Authors (Graphic Design)
Authors (3D Design)
Authors Current Directions in Psychology
Authors Applied Psychology in health Care
Authors International (Current Directions in
Psychology)
322 (49%) students responded to our question
(Question 6).
Phase One results provided both a good indication
of how students feel about using social media as
part of a university course and a view of how they
use it in their daily lives. The study also identified
students’ knowledge of, and most preferred, social
media platforms; this information was used to
inform Phase Two of the study. The total timeframe
for the study was 24 months in total.
3 RESULTS
Thematic analysis was conducted on the qualitative
data, obtained from the survey, to identify themes.
NVivo 10 word queries were also used to analyse
some of the qualitative data, with resulting images
displayed in the form of word tags.
The quantitative data obtained via the online survey
was analysed using Survey Monkey frequencies and
descriptive statistics.
3.1 Overall Results
322 survey responses were received, an overall
response rate of 49%.
Demographic information:
71.76% of the respondents were female.
73.85% were aged 16-25 years.
88% of respondents used social media to keep in
contact with friends and family.
20% use social media as an academic tool.
The most frequently used social media tools were:
1. Facebook
2. Snapchat
3. Instagram
CSEDU 2018 - 10th International Conference on Computer Supported Education
348
4. YouTube
5. Google+
6. Pinterest
7. Tumblr
8. Twitter
9. LinkedIn
10. Flikr
11. Reddit
The majority of respondents indicated YouTube and
Facebook were the most effective social media tools
for use within the university; Flikr, Tumblr and
Reddit were considered the least useful.
3.2 Question 6 Results
Students were asked: How do you feel about using
social media as part of a university course?
An overwhelming majority of 80.6% (n= 724.6)
sees social media as part of their courses as
something positive that helps them to stay
connected, informed, engaged & supported; 8.3%
stayed neutral, whereas just 11.1% believes that
social media in their courses are distracting,
overwhelming, uncomfortable & annoying, invades
privacy and is not for teaching.
Students could select more than one answer from
Table 1 below, hence the high response rate of 899.
Table 1: Question 6: How do you feel about using social
media as part of a university course?
Connected to the university
“Social Media Platforms at university
should only be used casually as an
optional extra to aid students. Social
media platforms such as Facebook can
be used as a form of communication
outreach for students, as most students
have Facebook integrated into their
everyday lives.”
147
Informed
“I've noticed some lectures have Twitter
accounts, in which they occasionally
post course relevant information or
helpful hints. This is great as many
students have Twitter feeds, allowing
easy accessibility to the various types of
info posted. Though to have this
information released solely to Twitter
users (obviously unintentional) is a
practice that should not be used, and is
146
in the universities responsibility to
control.”
Connected to fellow students
“Would be good to have a page each
dedicated to your course so people
could ask questions etc without having
to message people individually. It also
allows students to connect with other
people in their course.”
131
Connected to the university community
“I use this to enhance my cultural life at
uni and for textbook second hand
shopping.”
127
Engaged 95
Supported 79
Neutral
“Unsure.”
74
Distracted
“'Can be a distraction.”
“Blackboard seems to have adequate
networking and info. Social media can
often be a barrage of mindless drivel
with a few golden nuggets, ultimately a
time waster that can be prone to
misinterpretation and can reduce
people’s ability to engage in real
conversations with real people.”
30
Social media not for education
“While using social media is great for
keep updated on OTHER people, I find
that using Twitter for university
education a little unnecessary as we do
keep up to date with ALL updates via
Blackboard. There is a phone app for
Blackboard and even emails for larger
messages where your limit on Twitter is
only 160(?) letters. The enthusiasm
towards teaching your students and
helping them understand the field they
are about to undertake is encouraging
but it is brought back when that
excitement is about Twitter.”
“I would prefer it being used on a more
commonly used social media like
F
acebook as
f
or example I don’t have
24
Student’s Perspectives Concerning the Use of Social Media as Communication and Educational Tools in a Tertiary Environment
349
twitter. I did have Twitter once but
found it uninteresting and boring.
Although I feel social media is more for
entertainment and down time for
yourself.”
Uncomfortable & Annoyed
“Not happy to use a media I wouldn't
normally just for education purposes.”
20
Overwhelmed
“Worried I might need to use social
media more often.”
19
Privacy invaded
“Doesn't bother me that much,
everything I have on my social media
accounts is private and I rarely post
anything.”
6
Total: 899
Positive: 725 = 80.6%
Neutral: 75 = 8.3%
Negative: 99 = 11.1%
Total: 899=100%
4 DISCUSSION
The quantitative results indicated that the majority
of students (80.6%, 725) felt positively about the
use of social media in their university course.
However, it must be noted that nearly 100 students
in the sample perceived the use of social media, as a
pedagogical tool, to be negative. This suggests that
to be inclusive, educators must consider those
students who prefer not to use social media
technology and ensure that a range communication
channels are used, rather than relying purely on
social media to reach students.
In total, 15 qualitative comments were received
regarding Question 6: How do you feel about using
social media as part of a university course?
5 (33%) comments were favorable regarding the
use of social media within courses, 6 (40%) were
neutral/unsure, and 4 (27%) of the comments
expressed a rejection towards social media use in
the university teaching context.
Some students (5) felt that social media was a
good tool for connecting and sharing
ideas/resources and to ‘keep updated on OTHER
people’. Students viewed social media as an
additional tool to ‘keep up to date with ALL updates
via blackboard’. The choice of social media tools is
deemed critical to the success of the teaching and
learning experience:
but it is brought back when that excitement is
about Twitter
I would prefer it being used on a more commonly
used social media like Facebook as for example I
don’t have Twitter’.
Clearly social media is valued as a way to connect
students and staff:
‘I use this to enhance my cultural life at uni.’
‘It also allows students to connect with other people
in their course.’
‘Would be good to have a page each dedicated to
your course so people could ask questions etc.
without having to message people individually.’
Respondents highlighted that social media makes
information more accessible to students: ‘allowing
easy accessibility to the various types of info
posted’, however, cautioned that critical important
information, of value to all students, should be kept
as a ‘core source on the university's website,
blackboard, emails etc. and from there, it can be
strung out to which ever social media sites chosen.’
Some respondents (6) reported neutral/unsure views
regarding social media used as an educational tool:
‘Not sure until I try.’
‘Never Used.’
‘I haven't used it much yet, too early in semester’
(low level of experience suggested); another
respondent expressed neutral feelings about the use
of social media in his course ‘Doesn't bother me
that much.
Some respondents (4) voiced negative views
regarding the use of social media, for example.
‘Social media can often be a barrage of mindless
drivel.’ This respondent also stressed that social
media is prone to misinterpretations, possibly to
delayed feedback from conversation partners. ‘…a
few golden nuggets, ultimately a time waster that
can be prone to misinterpretation and can reduce
people’s ability to engage in real conversations
with real people.’
Three other respondents stated:
‘not happy to use a media I wouldn't normally just
for education purposes.’
‘Can be a distraction.’ (Highlighting the distractive
nature of social media.)
‘Worried I might need to use social media more
often.’ (Concerned about being forced to use more
social media more than would like.)
CSEDU 2018 - 10th International Conference on Computer Supported Education
350
5 LIMITATIONS & FUTURE
DIRECTIONS
Previous studies have shown that technology
impacts on student performance as a fundamental
antecedent of technology use and adoption (Kulik,
1994; Cradler, 2002; Olsen 2005; Luppicini, 2005).
Although research suggests increasing efforts to
adopt and utilise social media in tertiary education,
we know little about whether students and
academics perceive such tools as an improvement to
their learning activities or as distracting, overly
complicating the learning experience and an
increase in workload.
The research findings contribute to the existing
knowledge regarding using social media experience
within the tertiary education context; it embeds
social media tools into courses and investigates the
perceptions of students using these tools during
their studies.
Analysis of the results provides some indication
of how social media is perceived in tertiary
education, however, it is important to note some
limitations and recommendations for future
research.
The variables used were self-reported measures.
The data is therefore subject to the errors and biases
that commonly occur when respondents are asked to
self-report, in this case regarding their perceptions
of social-media use within the higher education
setting.
Phase One of the study focused on students
studying in Semester 1 and this cohort was not
included in Phase Two of the research. This means
that changes in perception are difficult to identify
and track. It would also be useful to include
academic staff in future studies to ascertain how
they feel about utilising social media within tertiary
education. For this reason, the project has been
extended to address these issues in further phases of
research.
The large sample invited to undertake the survey
(647 students studying interdisciplinary programs)
is viewed as representative of the general student
population at the university. Unfortunately, only
322
students responded to Question 6, which is less
than 50%, and cannot be considered as a
representation of the overall university’s student
population.
6 CONCLUSION
The research findings show that the use of social
media in tertiary education increases the levels of
engagement between students, with teaching staff,
and with the university. Students enjoy using simple
and easily accessible social media tools, due to the
enjoyable social connectedness and associated fun
elements.
Social media is an effective communication tool
that can enhance the learning process, especially as
it enables engagement with tutors and course
coordinators. It also assists with the easy
distribution of information regarding lectures,
courses and careers. Facebook in particular is
favoured as a learning tool to interact with tutors
and students and to facilitate group work.
However, teaching staff are advised to use
caution to ensure the use of social media within the
learning environment has a clear purpose and
outcome and is not just be used for the sake of it.
The negative aspects of using social media are
clearly a concern for some students: the addictive
element, complexity and intruding nature.
Therefore, due to these issues, the compulsory use
of social media in the learning environment is
discouraged. Teaching staff are encouraged to take
great care when implementing social-media into
their teaching practice, and should consider which
tool would work best for a particular student cohort.
Research findings have been disseminated to
educators at the university and beyond (via research
papers and conference presentations etc.). Phase
Three results will provide more insight into the
topic and will include the views of teaching staff.
It is recommended that future research further
investigates this topic by focusing on the
differences in the way individuals use and value
social media within the higher education setting.
Studies that examine the introduction of social
media policies within tertiary education are also
encouraged.
REFERENCES
Beidelman. J., 2015. Transforming learning: social media
as an Educational Tool. Educational Technology. Sep
(14). pp. 1-4. Retrieved June15, 2016 from
http://blog.theeducationpartners.com/social-media-as-
an-educational-tool
Blankenship, M., 2010. Motivations for Using Social
Networking Sites by College Students for Educational
Student’s Perspectives Concerning the Use of Social Media as Communication and Educational Tools in a Tertiary Environment
351
Purposes. In: The Hispanic Outlook in Higher
Education Magazine, 20, pp. 11-12. 29-11-2010.
Bosch, E., T., 2009. Using online social networking for
teaching and learning: Facebook use at the University
of Cape Town. In: Communication: South African
Journal for Communication Theory and Research.
35(2), pp. 185-200.
Cao, Y., & Hong, P. 2011. Antecedents and consequences
of social media utilization in college teaching: a
proposed model with mixed-‐methods investigation.
In: On the Horizon. 19(4), pp. 297 –306.
Cradler, J. et al., (2002). How does technology influence
student learning? Learn Lead Technology, 29 (8), pp.
46-49.
Cych, L., 2006. Social networks. Emerging Technologies
for Learning. Retrieved June 1, 2016 from
http://www.becta.org.uk/corporate/publications/
Dabbaghi, N., Kitsantas, A., 2010. Personal Learning
Environments, social media, and self-regulated
learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and
informal learning. In: Internet and Higher Education.
15(1), pp. 3-8.
Frand, J. L., 2000. The information-age mindset: Changes
in students and implications for higher education.
EDUCAUSE, September/October, 15-24. [verified 7
Apr 2007]
http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ERM0051.pdf
Ishizuka, K., 2010. People Who Need People: How 11
Intrepid Users Get the Most out of Social Media. In:
School Library Journal. 56(2), pp.32-36.Charlotte,
USA.
Jones, S., 2002. The Internet goes to college: How
students are living in the future with today’s
technology. Washington DC: Pew Internet &
American Life Project. [verified 7 Apr 2007]
http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_College_Report
.pdf
Kulik J.A., 1994. Meta analytic studies of findings on
computer based instruction. E.L. Baker, H.F. O'Neil
Jr. (Eds.), Technology assessment in education and
training, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
Luppicini, R., 2005. A systems definition of educational
technology in society. Educ Technology Soc, 8 (3),
pp. 103-109.
Millea, J., Green, I. & Putland, G., 2005. Emerging
technologies: A framework for thinking. Canberra:
education.au limited. Retrieved June 7, 2016 from
http://www.det.act.gov.au/publicat/pdf/emergingtechn
ologies.pdf
Moran, M., Seaman, J., Tinti-Kane, H., 2011. Teaching,
Learning, and Sharing: How today’s Higher
Education Faculty Use Social Media. Pearson
Learning Solutions and Babson Survey Research
Group, Boston, USA.
Olsen, S., 2005. Are we getting smarter or dumber?
ZDnet. Retrieved December 12, 2016 from:
http://www.zdnet.com/article/are-we-getting-smarter-
or-dumber/
Velliaris, M., Palmer, Picard, Smith, Green, & Miller.,
2012. "Australian Tertiary Learning and Teaching
Scholarship and Research 2007–2012”.
CSEDU 2018 - 10th International Conference on Computer Supported Education
352