Getis-Ord Gi* to identify hotspot areas and plan
management strategies. Truong and Somenahalli
(2011) used the spatial autocorrelation coefficient
Moran’s I to identify pedestrian–vehicle crash
hotspots and unsafe bus stops using hotspot analysis
Getis-Ord Gi*. Pedestrian–vehicle crash hotspots
were concluded to correlate strongly with the
locations of bus stops.
Hotspot analysis Getis-Ord Gi* and spatial
autocorrelation coefficient Moran’s I were also used
to map forest fire risk zones in the Yeguare Region
of Honduras (Cáceres, 2011). Factors such as slope,
elevation, and distance to tribute affected the risk of
a forest fire. Fires exhibit a spatial aggregation
distribution and can be related to population density.
The characteristics of fires are well-suited to the use
of spatial statistics and an autocorrelation analysis to
identify hotspot areas and risk factors for disaster
prevention and management.
2 STUDY AREA AND
METHODOLOGY
The M
L
6.4 earthquake on 3 March 2010, which had
its epicentre in Jianxin village in southern Taiwan,
caused a building owned by a spinning and weaving
company in Tainan City to catch fire. Furthermore, a
technology factory caught fire on 28 July 2011,
causing substantial economic losses in the city. The
fire on 23 October 2012 at the Beimen branch of
Sinying Hospital in the Beimen District of Tainan
City resulted in the deaths of 13 elderly people and
injured 69 others. These serious fires and various
other factors led us to choose Tainan City as a study
area because of its variety of lifestyles and areas,
including villages, mountainous areas, coastal areas,
and industrial areas. The diversity of the city has
caused both its population and industrial
development to increase rapidly.
This analysis was completed through three steps:
a literature review and data collection, statistics
analysis, and GIS spatial statistics analysis. The
study area was divided into a grid, each square of
which was 1000 × 1000 m
2
in size. Fire-related data
were separated by injuries and deaths, age and
gender of the injured and deceased individuals, fire
location, land use, and population density. The
coordinates of the fires were overlaid onto an
administrative map to create a fire point density map
to represent fire locations.
Tools for average nearest neighbour and global
analysis using Moran's I and Getis-Ord Gi* analysis
were employed to analyse if the fires displayed a
clustered, dispersed, or random pattern on the fire
hotspot map. The null hypothesis was the default
hypothesis and states that there is no association
between fire occurrence and the factors. The null
hypothesis was assumed to be true until evidence
indicated otherwise. The rejection of the null
hypothesis concluded that there were reasons to
believe that a relationship between fire and the other
factors existed. The tools used for spatial statistics
analysis are explained:
(1) Average nearest neighbour analysis
Euclidean distance was used in the nearest
neighbour analysis. The average nearest neighbour
distance tool measures the distance between each
feature centroid and its nearest neighbour’s centroid
location to predict the nearest neighbour index. Five
values obtained by the analysis included observed
mean distance, expected mean distance, nearest
neighbour ratio, z-score, and p-value. The z-score
and p-value were used for judging the possibility to
reject the spatial random pattern of the null
hypothesis. A z-score less than −2.58 or greater than
2.58 and a p-value lower than 0.01 with a confidence
level of over 99% were used to reject the null
hypothesis and confirm a clustered pattern.
The average nearest neighbour ratio (NNR) is
calculated using the observed average distance
divided by the expected average distance, with the
expected average distance being based on a
hypothetical random distribution with the same
number of features covering the same total area. If
NNR is less than 1, the study pattern is clustered; if
the index is greater than 1, the trend is toward a
dispersed pattern.
(2) Global analysis by Moran's I
The spatial autocorrelation tool global Moran's I
measures spatial autocorrelation based on both
feature locations and feature values simultaneously.
The method measures each feature centroid and its
nearest neighbour’s centroid location to analyse the
spatial autocorrelation of each fire. The eigenvalues
of this technique included the Moran's I, expected
index, variance, z-score, and p-value. The same
conditions for z-score, p-value, and confidence level
as for average nearest neighbour analysis were used
to reject the null hypothesis. The method evaluates
the pattern of fires as clustered, dispersed, or
random. If Moran’s I is greater than 0 (positive
value), the fires were clustered; the fires were
dispersed if the index is less than 0 (negative value),
and the fires were randomly distributed if the index
is close to 0.
(3) Hotspot analysis using Getis-Ord Gi*
The point density tool calculates the density of point