![](bg8.png)
taxonomy is sufficient for specific subtasks in such
use cases. In any case, we expect more refinements
will be needed for modeling robot capabilities (e.g.,
robot arm manipulation). Also, our ontology does not
yet provide support for robot-robot interaction, fully
autonomous robot operations, underwater operations,
and, for example, issues such as network resilience.
The aforementioned suggestions and extensions will
also require an exhaustive user evaluation to cover
more parts of the ontology in different scenarios.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work was supported by European Union’s
Seventh Framework Programme for research,
technological development and demonstration under
the TRADR project No. FP7-ICT-609763.
REFERENCES
Bagosi, T., Hindriks, K. V., and Neerincx, M. A. (2016).
Ontological reasoning for human-robot teaming in
search and rescue missions. In 11th ACM/IEEE HRI,
pages 595–596.
Casper, J. and Murphy, R. R. (2003). Human-robot
interactions during the robot-assisted urban search
and rescue response at the world trade center. IEEE
Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part
B (Cybernetics), 33(3):367–385.
Endsley, M. (1995). Toward a theory of situation awareness
in dynamic systems. Human Factor, 37:32–64.
Jacobsson, L., Malec, J., and Nilsson, K. (2016).
Modularization of skill ontologies for industrial
robots. In Proceedings of ISR 2016: 47st
International Symposium on Robotics, pages 1–6.
Johnson, M., Bradshaw, J. M., Feltovich, P. J., Jonker,
C. M., van Riemsdijk, M. B., and Sierhuis, M.
(2014). Coactive design: Designing support for
interdependence in joint activity. J. Hum.-Robot
Interact., 3(1):43–69.
Kruijff-Korbayov
´
a, I., Colas, F., Gianni, M., Pirri, F.,
de Greeff, J., Hindriks, K., Neerincx, M.,
¨
Ogren,
P., Svoboda, T., and Worst, R. (2015). Tradr
project: Long-term human-robot teaming for robot
assisted disaster response. KI - K
¨
unstliche Intelligenz,
29(2):193–201.
Lemaignan, S., Ros, R., M
¨
osenlechner, L., Alami,
R., and Beetz, M. (2010). Oro, a knowledge
management platform for cognitive architectures in
robotics. In 2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference
on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pages 3548–3553.
Lewis, M., Wang, H., Chien, S.-Y., Scerri, P.,
Velagapudi, P., Sycara, K., and Kane, B.
(2010). Teams organization and performance in
multi-human/multi-robot teams. In 2010 IEEE
International Conference on Systems, Man and
Cybernetics, pages 1617–1623.
Li, X., Bilbao, S., Martin-Wanton, T., Bastos, J., and
Rodriguez, J. (2017). Swarms ontology: A common
information model for the cooperation of underwater
robots. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 17(3):569–588.
Liu, S., Brewster, C., and Shaw, D. (2013a). Ontologies
for crisis management: a review of state of the art
in ontology design and usability. In Proceedings of
the 10th International ISCRAM Conference, pages
349–359, Baden-Baden, Germany.
Liu, Y., Nejat, G., and Vilela, J. (2013b). Learning
to cooperate together: A semi-autonomous control
architecture for multi-robot teams in urban search and
rescue. In IEEE International Symposium on Safety,
Security, and Rescue Robotics (SSRR), pages 1–6.
Mescherin, S. A., Kirillov, I., and Klimenko, S. (2013).
Ontology of emergency shared situation awareness
and crisis interoperability. In 2013 International
Conference on Cyberworlds, pages 159–162.
Missikoff, M. and Taglino, F. (2004). An Ontology-based
Platform for Semantic Interoperability, pages
617–633. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Murphy, R. R. (2004). Human-robot interaction in rescue
robotics. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and
Cybernetics, 34(2):138–153.
Murphy, R. R. (2014). Disaster Robotics. The MIT Press.
Murphy, R. R., Tadokoro, S., Nardi, D., Jacoff, A., Fiorini,
P., Choset, H., and Erkmen, A. M. (2008). Search and
Rescue Robotics, pages 1151–1173. Springer, Berlin.
Neerincx, M. (2003). Cognitive task load analysis:
allocating tasks and designing support, chapter 13,
pages 283–305. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, NJ.
Riley, J. M. and Endsley, M. R. (2004). The hunt
for situation awareness: Human-robot interaction
in search and rescue. Proceedings of the Human
Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting,
48(3):693–697.
Rivero, C. R., Hern
´
andez, I., Ruiz, D., and Corchuelo,
R. (2013). Benchmarking data exchange among
semantic-web ontologies. IEEE Transactions on
Knowledge and Data Engineering, 25(9):1997–2009.
Schlenoff, C. and Messina, E. (2005). A robot ontology
for urban search and rescue. In Proceedings of
the 2005 ACM Workshop on Research in Knowledge
Representation for Autonomous Systems, KRAS ’05,
pages 27–34, New York, NY, USA. ACM.
Sheth, A. P. (1999). Changing Focus on Interoperability in
Information Systems: From System, Syntax, Structure
to Semantics, chapter 2, pages 5–29. Springer US,
Boston, MA.
Simperl, E. P. B. and Tempich, C. (2006). Ontology
engineering: A reality check. In Meersman, R. and
Tari, Z., editors, On the Move to Meaningful Internet
Systems, volume 4275 of Lecture Notes in Computer
Science, pages 836–854, Berlin, Heidelberg. Springer.
Tenorth, M., Perzylo, A. C., Lafrenz, R., and Beetz,
M. (2013). Representation and exchange of
knowledge about actions, objects, and environments
in the roboearth framework. IEEE Transactions on
Automation Science and Engineering, 10(3):643–651.
Xu, W. and Zlatanova, S. (2007). Ontologies for Disaster
Management Response, pages 185–200. Springer,
Berlin, Heidelberg.
Ontology Design for Task Allocation and Management in Urban Search and Rescue Missions
629