![](bg8.png)
lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2016/2102/oj. Retrieved 2017-
12-22.
Feiner, J. and Andrews, K. (2012). Usability reporting with
UsabML. In Winckler, M., Forbrig, P., and Bern-
haupt, R., editors, Proc. 4
th
International Conference
on Human-Centered Software Engineering, volume
7623 of HCSE 2012, pages 342–351. Lecture Notes
in Computer Science, Springer Berlin / Heidelberg.
Feiner, J., Andrews, K., and Krajnc, E. (2010). UsabML
– the usability report markup language: Formalising
the exchange of usability findings. In Proc. 2
nd
ACM
SIGCHI Symposium on Engineering Interactive Com-
puting Systems, EICS 2010, pages 297–302. ACM.
Google (2017). Accessibility – usability – material design
guidelines. https://material.io/guidelines/usability/
accessibility.html. Retrieved 2017-12-22.
Hawes, N., Marshall, S., and Anslow, C. (2015). Code-
surveyor: Mapping large-scale software to aid in code
comprehension. In 3
rd
Working Conference on Soft-
ware Visualization, VISSOFT 2015, pages 96–105.
Henry, S. L. (2013). Easy checks – a first review
of web accessibility. https://www.w3.org/WAI/eval/
preliminary.html. Retrieved 2017-12-22.
Hvannberg, E. T., Law, E. L.-C., and L
´
erusd
´
ottir,
M. K. (2007). Heuristic evaluation: Compa-
ring ways of finding and reporting usability pro-
blems. Interacting with Computers, 19(2):225–240.
http://kth.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:527483/
FULLTEXT01. Retrieved 2017-12-22.
ISO (2000). ISO/DIS 9241-11 ergonomics of human-
system interaction – part 11: Usability: Definitions
and concepts. Standard, International Organization
for Standardization. https://www.iso.org/standard/
63500.html. Retrieved 2017-12-22.
ISO (2006). SO/IEC 25062:2006 software engineering –
software product quality requirements and evaluation
(SQuaRE) – common industry format (CIF) for usabi-
lity test reports. International Organization for Stan-
dardization. http://www.iso.org/iso/iso catalogue/
catalogue tc/catalogue detail.htm?csnumber=43046.
Retrieved 2017-12-22.
ISO (2008). ISO/DIS 9241-171: 2008 ergonomics
of human-system interaction – part 171: Gui-
dance on software accessibility. Technical report,
International Organization for Standardization.
http://www.iso.org/iso/iso catalogue/catalogue ics/
catalogue detail ics.htm?csnumber=39080. Retrieved
2017-12-22.
Komiyama, T. (2008). Usability evaluation based on
international standards for software quality evalua-
tion. Technical Journal 2, NEC. http://www.nec.
co.jp/techrep/en/journal/g08/n02/080207.pdf. Retrie-
ved 2017-12-22.
Molich, R., Chattratichart, J., Hinkle, V., Jensen, J. J.,
Kirakowski, J., Sauro, J., Sharon, T., and Traynor,
B. (2010). Rent a car in just 0, 60, 240 or 1,217
seconds? — comparative usability measurement,
cue-8. Journal of Usability Studies, 6(1):8–24. http://
www.upassoc.org/upa publications/jus/2010november/
JUS Molich November 2010.pdf. Retrieved 2017-
12-22.
Murphy, G. C. (2016). Technical perspective: Software is
natural. Commun. ACM, 59(5):121–121.
Nielsen, J. (1994). Guerrilla hci – using discount usa-
bility engineering to penetrate the intimidation bar-
rier. http://www.nngroup.com/articles/guerrilla-hci/.
Retrieved 2017-12-22.
Nielsen, J. and Molich, R. (1990). Heuristic evaluation of
user interfaces. In Proc. Conference on Human Fac-
tors in Computing Systems, CHI ’90, pages 249–256.
ACM.
Patch, K., Allan, J., Lowney, G., and Spellman, J. F.
(2015a). User agent accessibility guidelines (UAAG)
2.0. W3C note, W3C. http://www.w3.org/ TR/ 2015/
NOTE-UAAG20-20151215/. Retrieved 2017-12-22.
Patch, K., Spellman, J., and Wahlbin, K. (2015b). Mo-
bile accessibility: How wcag 2.0 and other w3c/wai
guidelines apply to mobile. Technical report,
W3C. https://www.w3.org/TR/mobile-accessibility-
mapping/. Retrieved 2017-12-22.
Shaw, M. (2002). What makes good research in software
engineering? International Journal on Software Tools
for Technology Transfer, 4(1):1–7.
The United Nations (2006). Convention on the rights of per-
sons with disabilities. Treaty Series, 2515:3. https://
www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/convention-
on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities/convention-
on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities-2.html.
Retrieved 2017-12-22.
Treviranus, J., Richards, J., and Spellman, J. F. (2015).
Authoring tool accessibility guidelines (ATAG) 2.0.
W3C recommendation, W3C. http://www.w3.org/
TR/2015/REC-ATAG20-20150924/. Retrieved 2017-
12-22.
Vilbergsd
´
ottir, S. G., Hvannberg, E. T., and Law, E.
L.-C. (2006). Classification of usability problems
(cup) scheme: Augmentation and exploitation. In
Proc. 4
th
Nordic Conference on Human-Computer
Interaction: Changing Rules (NordiCHI2006), pages
281–290. http://diuf.unifr.ch/people/pallottv/docs/
NordiCHI-2006/LongPapers/p281-vilbergsdottir.pdf.
Retrieved 2017-12-22.
Yusop, N. S. M., Grundy, J., and Vasa, R. (2016). Reporting
usability defects: Do reporters report what software
developers need? In Proc. 20
th
International Confe-
rence on Evaluation and Assessment in Software En-
gineering, EASE ’16, pages 38:1–38:10. ACM.
ICEIS 2018 - 20th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems
526