![](bg9.png)
A methodology of BMC Generation from DEMO
CM can be developed as a reverse process of this
paper. The void in the correspondence table, that is
no correspondence of Value Proposition and
Channels, gives the opportunity for DEMO
researchers to identify these building blocks
corresponds to which components in DEMO.
6 CONCLUSION
In this paper we proposed a methodology to generate
DEMO Construction Model from Business Model
Canvas. We found the correspondence between
building blocks in Business Model Canvas and
DEMO Construction Model. We suggest DEMO-
Oriented BMC as a specified BMC containing the
organizational building blocks of DEMO CM, and
step-by-step process to create it. We propose DEMO
CM generation step-by-step process from DEMO-
Oriented BMC.
In this paper, we only focused on generating
Object System construction from Object System
function; Object System function generation from
Using System is outside the scope of this research.
This paper only proposed a methodology to generate
DEMO Construction Model from Business Model
Canvas, not the other way around. A comparative
study across several business models is not yet
conducted.
This paper visualized the connection between
BMC as an Object System function and DEMO CM
as an Object System construction. This paper can
contribute to adding an alignment between Object
System function and Object System construction, as
a part of system development process.
This paper can give some insights about future
research related to this work. Formulation of
DEMO-Oriented BMC can be refined further. A
methodology of BMC Generation from DEMO
Construction model can be developed as a reverse
process of this paper. A comparative study across
several business models can also be conducted. By
using proposed methodology in this paper and future
studies, we hope that we can gather several business
models, generate construction models from them and
create a pool of submodels, modify them to create a
new construction model, and generate a new
business model to create a new business.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work has been supported by Indonesia
Endowment Fund for Education (LPDP).
REFERENCES
Albani, A., and Dietz, J. L. (2011). Enterprise ontology based
development of information systems. International
Journal of Internet and Enterprise Management, 7(1), 41-
63.
Dietz, J.L. (2005) •System ontology and its role in system
development, in Castro, J. and Teniente, E. (Eds.):
Advanced Information Systems Engineering Workshops
(CAiSE 2005), Vol. 2 of FEUP Edicoes, Porto, Portugal,
pp.273–284.
Dietz, J. L. (2006). Enterprise ontology: theory and
methodology. Springer Science and Business Media.
Magretta, J., 2002. Why Business Models Matter. Harvard
Business Review 80 (5), 86-92.
Martikainen, A., Niemi, P., and Pekkanen, P. (2014).
Developing a service offering for a logistical service
provider—Case of local food supply chain. International
Journal of Production Economics, 157, 318-326.
Op’t Land, M., and Krouwel, M. (2013). Exploring
organizational implementation fundamentals.
In Enterprise Engineering Working Conference(pp. 28-
42). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Osterwalder, A. (2004). The business model ontology: A
proposition in a design science approach.
Osterwalder, A., and Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business model
generation: a handbook for visionaries, game changers,
and challengers. John Wiley & Sons.
Perinforma, A. P. C. (2015). The Essence of Organisation: An
Introduction to Enterprise Engineering. Sapio Enterprise
Engineering.
Pombinho, J., Tribolet, J., and Aveiro, D. (2014). Linking
Value Chains-Combining e3Value and DEMO for
Specifying Value Networks. In EEWC (pp. 105-119).
Quak, H., Balm, S., and Posthumus, B. (2014). Evaluation of
city logistics solutions with business model analysis.
Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 125, 111-124.
Salgado, C. E., Teixeira, J., Machado, R. J., and Maciel, R. S.
(2014). Generating a Business Model Canvas through
Elicitation of Business Goals and Rules from Process-
level Use Cases. In International Conference on Business
Informatics Research (pp. 276-289). Springer, Cham.
Suga, T., and Iijima, J. (2015) Does ‘Merging DEMO Models’
satisfy the associative law? - Validation of partial models
and merge operation. In Proceedings of the 7
th
International Joint Conference on Knowledge Discovery,
Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management,
vol. 2, pp. 467–478.
Wirtz, B. W., Pistoia, A., Ullrich, S., and Göttel, V. (2016).
Business models: Origin, development and future
research perspectives. Long Range Planning, 49(1), 36-54.
ICEIS 2018 - 20th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems
392