frequency support during faults or transients
(Munteanu, 2018).
In addition the proposed solution in this paper is
exchanging energy with the network to assist it. For
example, the residential RES based energy system
can inject energy in the grid in case of need
(contributing to peak shaving) and absorb energy
from the grid during the night, when the
consumption is low and base power capacity plants
are forced to reduce the production with negative
consequences in efficiency and pollution level.
Developing a communication system between
the grid and the residential power stations based on
economic relationships, letting the results to be
known by people, the customers are educated to
consider their energy consumption carefully.
Our solution, considering both solar and wind
resources, is exploiting the complementarities
between these RES, especially useful due to their
compensatory seasonal variation, for decreasing the
size of the storage devices and consequently
optimizing costs.
The above considerations are backed by the
forecasted evolution of prices for the considered
RES equipments. For example in (Graichen, 2015)
the PV energy cost is estimated to decrease from
9c/kWh in 2014 to 4-6 c/kWh in 2025 and 2-4
c/kWh in 2050, a conservative estimation where the
variation limits take into account the local
conditions.
For small wind turbines, WT, in (DWEA, 2015),
the cost of a kWh is previewed to drop from 28
c/kWh in 2014 to 11 c/kWh in 2030. For those
interested in the next power range, for 4-15 kW
installed power; the costs are 20 c in 2014 and 6.5
c/kWh for 2030. But such cases are not very
encountered. Even if the wind power range would be
smaller, the wind energy has a higher capacity
factor, about double: 12-18% for PV and up to 40 %
for WT. That means, in average, that a 4 kW PV will
produce the same energy as a 2 kW WT per year.
Also a shift in policies which encouraged RES
until now would work in favour of wind. Some of
the policies that have been instrumental in growing
the solar market have had as a consequence the
slowdown in growth of the distributed wind market.
As solar module prices have dropped in recent years,
many of these imbalanced solar programs have been
scaled back and an emerging effect is the reversal of
the trend in favour of wind, (DWEA, 2015):”In
Japan, the FIT (Feed in Tariff) program now pays
distributed wind up to 20 kW over twice the rate of
solar PV “to encourage technology diversity”.
2.2 The Urban Electric Vehicles
It is important to consider the type of the EV. The
future urban transportation system will imply some
changes in today’s cars structure. In crowded cities,
where it is already difficult to find parking places,
will enjoy the spread of many types of vehicles with
2, 3, 4 seats or small busses (about 8 seats). This is
because a great advantage of the EV driving system
is that variable places number vehicles can have
about the same efficiency. This is also coming from
the reduction of the size and masses, adapting the
solution to the needs. Looking at Fig. 3, it is obvious
that such variety of EVs will better ensure the
transportation needs. The variety of EVs, with
reduced number of seats, will occupy less parking
spaces, contributing to the decongestion of the future
Smart Cities.
Figure 3: Number of travellers in a car by activity purpose
(NPTS Report, 2000).
Even automated driven Electric vehicles will
ensure an optimization of the transportation. Many
studies are developed related to EVs progress. For
example on (www.navigantresearch.com) the
interested people can find many studies, such us: a)
Electric Mobility in Smart Cities: E-Buses, E-
Bikes, E-Scooters, PEVs in Shared Mobility
Services (2016); b) Light Electric Vehicles: Low
Speed/Neighbourhood EVs, Electric Motorcycles,
and Electric Scooters (2017). The studies titles are
giving a good image on the future EVs in Smart
Cities. To these lists of EVs we would like to add
three wheel EVs as an option for EVs supposed to
transport 3 people or less and some luggage in a
daily travel in a town. A very interesting research
result is presented in Table 1.
RESIST 2018 - Special Session on Resilient Smart city Transportation
612