However, although this has allowed the centres to
reach technological and service levels "leading", has
also put Spain "in the crosshairs" of many European
scientific societies and groups of other countries,
since we still have a lot for improving in terms of
control mechanisms (BMD, 2016).
Currently there is no control and transparent
system for the professional to verify if the biological
samples and patient tests are right, which prevents
serious errors. This paper marks the challenge of
increasing trust on the part of the patients involved by
ensuring the control and monitoring of the samples
and tests of the patient in such a way that the risk of
error is reduced to minimum levels by proposing a
software solution based on the definition of automatic
models and protocols, which by incorporating the
appropriate devices, control the traceability of the
samples in parallel to the work of the laboratory
technician. This solution must be affordable and
compatible with the standards that govern hospital
management processes and laboratory samples in
assisted reproduction.
2 PROBLEM
Human reproduction laboratories are exposed to
multiple incidents, but one of the most serious is that
which causes the erroneous identification of
biological samples (ovules, sperm and embryos),
being the misidentification a common problem in all
areas of health.
An identification error occurs when a patient is
incorrectly paired with a test, treatment or procedure
and is usually caused by stress, work overload,
multiple interruptions, material errors, among many
other factors.
University Hospital Utrecht has made public the
possible fertilization of oocytes of 26 women with
sperm outside their partner, that is, a score of women
or couples have sired children with the sperm of the
man who was not the indicated. Finally, the center
detected that the pipette that had been used in some
oocyte fertilization procedures was contaminated
with the sperm of another patient (País, 2016).
Certain processes, such as the mixture of ovules
and sperm, and the transfer of embryos to the uterus,
are seen as critical, since they represent "the point of
no return." If an erroneous identification is produced
in assisted reproduction laboratories, it can be go
unnoticed practically in each of the steps of the
process involving gametes and embryos. The final
result will be catastrophic for both the patient, as for
the professional and the clinic, with legal implications
that can lead to sanctions and even, in extreme cases,
at the close of the clinic.
One of the most used solutions to avoid these
possible errors, is the manual double-test protocol
(MDT), defined as the obligation of "double control
performed in all clinical and laboratory procedures"
with the expectation that, if a " operator "makes a
mistake, it will be captured by the other" witness "in
time to be resolved. However, the evidence suggests
that it may not be as safe and effective. The effects of
mechanization of tasks can reduce the effectiveness
of double testimony because the levels of attention
decrease when the same action is carried out
repeatedly by the same person. Therefore, the risk of
error during the double-checking protocol may
increase due to numerous problems, such as process
redundancy, attentional blindness, ambiguous
responsibility, errors in the verification, additional
work overload and increased stress. In addition, the
process of double control produces additional
"paperwork" to an already overwhelming work
environment and entails the duplication of resources
in an already expensive process.
For these reasons, several alternatives have been
developed based on less manual identification
techniques in order to replace most of the steps
required by human witnesses in assisted reproduction
laboratories. The most widespread are:
Systems based on barcode labels, which,
moreover, are often used in collaboration with
MDT protocols. It consists of identifying the
pipettes with a bar code so that as a process is
executed in the laboratory, the technician uses
a reader of said bar code to collect the life cycle
of the sample. In this regard, it is expected that
the "Single European Code" (SEC) will be
launched soon, which would increase
confidence in the realization of these
techniques in a quality framework (RHA
Professional). However, this code consists of
40 characters, too large to be placed in
cryopreservation devices: Semen, oocytes and
embryos are conserved in devices called straws
or vitrification supports. Even a simplification
is not feasible through the use of 20 characters
(RHA Professional).
Systems based on silicon bar codes that are
injected directly into the ovules or embryos,
work in a similar way but the identification is
found in the sample itself. This option is a bit
aggressive in the eyes of the donor of the
sample, since a marker is being introduced to
his biological sample, to his possible son.