satisfying modeling quality, and the regression
equation for normalization variable as follows:
F
0
=r
1
t
1
+r
2
t
2
=-0.3878t
1
+0.2354t
2
=0.2291E
1
+0.1756E
2
+0.0144E
3
+0.2889E
4
+0.1739E
5
+0.2070E
6
+0.2178E
7
(2)
Regression equation y to x={x
1
,x
2
,…,x
p
}:
y=0.8345x
1
+0.8342x
2
+6.4500x
3
+10.6437x
4
+0.1
147x
5
+0.0326x
6
+1.6716x
7
-8325.1270 (4)
As we can see from the equation(4), that x
j
is
negative to showed x
j
and y are negative correlation,
that x
j
is positive showed that x
j
and y are positive
correlation. For x
1
,x
2
,x
3
,x
4
,x
5
,x
6
,x
7
, the degree of
positive correlation in a descending order as
x
4
>x
3
>x
7
>x
1
>x
2
>x
5
>x
6
, That x
4
is maximum
indicated x
4
is the biggest influence for y.
2.3.4 Results analysis
From the PLS model regression equation (4) and
figure 1, it was concluded that each variable xj's has
influence on per capita net income of farmers y:
through the establishment of the regression equation,
it showed that the larger independent variable
regression coefficient absolute value, and the greater
this variable’s influence on per capita net income of
farmers. The results showed that the agricultural
output value and value of forestry, animal husbandry
and fishery havethe same influence on per capita net
income of farmers to some degree. The reason is that
all output values should deduct production costs of
farming, forestry, animal husbandry and fishery,
then the farmers' income. Agricultural
mechanization level and the investment of
agricultural production both affect per capita net
income of farmers, but the impact is not significant.
Non-farm income plays obvious promoting effect on
increasing of per capita net income of farmers. In
thisstudy, In order to emphasize the relationship
between the surplus labor transfer and the farmers'
income, we took non-agricultural income which
only take salary income earned in the form of
engaging in non-agricultural industries after labor
transfer to work as an example. In fact, the farmers'
income of non-agricultural income partly also
include the incomes from operating of the second
and third industry and property transfer income and
so on, so when we took the salary income as
example to explain the influence of non-agricultural
income from per capita net income of the farmers,
and there is also gearing effect by property income
and transfer income of the, etc. together with salary
income.
Among these, how much the number of migrant
rural labor directly shows the transfer of rural
surplus labor, and non-agricultural income is the
manifestation of earned income by engaging in
non-agricultural industries in form of wages after the
rural surplus labor transfer. Therefore, the research
results showed that with the improvement of modern
agricultural mechanization, agricultural output value
increased at the same time and also produced a large
number of surplus labor force. Retention of surplus
labor force in agriculture will cause a decline in
agricultural labor productivity, so agricultural
production is improving but it does not affect much
on the increase in per capita net income of farmers.
At the same time, in the context of fixed land
acreage and improving degree of agricultural
mechanization, the effect to promoting farmers'
income by increasing the number of workers for the
agricultural will be limited.
3 CONCLUSIONS AND
SUGGESTIONS
Through previous results analysis, we can reach the
following conclusions: (1) Adoption the PLS model
can make the results more intuitively and it
accurately reflect the influence of various influence
factors to farmers' income, according to this, it was
found that the smoothly and orderly transfer of rural
surplus labor is the realization of the effective ways
to increase farmers' income. (2) on the basis of the
limited planting land area, it allocates rationally the
agricultural workforce and the proportion of the
number of rural migrant workers, which further
increases the non-agricultural income and improves
output value of forestry, animal husbandry and
fishery industry to realize per capita net income of
farmers and effective way.
For increasing farmers' income, it combined with
the present situation of the rural population in China
and surplus labor transfer long-term characteristic,
the following policy suggestions have been put
forward: (1) To accurately position the government
in the labor transfer work, actively promote
institutional innovation, change from directly
management to indirectly control the economic,
unblock external environment of rural labor force
transfer. (2) To improve the training ability of
training institutions and government should
strengthen the support to training institutions, and
increase training for farmers to enhance working
skills and cultural quality of rural labor force,
therefore. (3) To guide the establishment of rural
labor transfer institutions or organizations,it