3.1.3 The Impact of Cone Radius on the
Antenna Performance
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55
-20
-18
-16
-14
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
S11 (dB)
Freq. (GHz)
3mm
4mm
5mm
6mm
7mm
Figure 4: S11 versus frequency for varying antenna length.
35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45
-20
-18
-16
-14
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
S11 (dB)
Freq. (GHz)
0.5mm
0.6mm
0.7mm
0.8mm
0.9mm
Figure 5: S11 versus frequency for varying dipole gap.
Here the antenna length and the dipole gap are
set as 4mm and 0.7mm respectively. And the cone
radius of the dipole is changed from 0.1mm to
0.7mm. In Fig. 6, with cone radius increasing,
reflection coefficient (S11) of resonant frequency
point decreases first and then increases. When the
cone radius of the dipole is 0.5mm, the efficiency of
the antenna is highest.
According to above simulation, when antenna
length, the dipole gap and cone radius are 4mm,
0.7mm and 0.5mm respectively, the performance of
antenna is best. However, compared with ideal
antenna shown in Fig. 2, the performance of above
antenna has huge difference from the one we need.
Its resonant characteristic is too prominent.
3.2 Simulation and Design for loaded
Dipole Antennas
According to antenna theory and above analysis, the
bandwidth of the dipole with pure metal is very
narrow. Its resonant characteristic is prominent.
While loaded antennas have flatter frequency
response and wider bandwidth. Therefore, loaded
antennas are used to improve the performance of
antennas in probes (Yang et al., 2014).
In last section we know that the impact of
antenna length on resonant frequency is obvious, so
the length and the loaded surface resistance are
mainly changed to optimize the performance of
antennas in this section. Here the dipole gap and
30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50
-24
-20
-16
-12
-8
-4
0
S11 (dB)
Freq. (GHz)
0.3mm
0.4mm
0.5mm
0.6mm
0.7mm
Figure 6: S11 versus frequency for varying cone radius.
cone radius are set as the optimal results which are
0.7mm and 0.5mm, and the substrate material of
dipoles is aluminium-oxide (Al
2
O
3
). In the loaded
antenna design, the resistance and the excitation
probably have poor contact when the dielectric and
the excitation are directly connected. So a sheet
metal (gold) with 0.1-mm thickness is added
between the dielectric and the excitation.
3.2.1 Optimization for Antenna Length
First, we optimize the length of loaded antenna. In
the process, based on that free space intrinsic
impedance is 377Ω, the surface resistance of single
arm of the dipole is set as 400Ω (Kraus, 2011).
Meanwhile, antenna length is changed from 3mm to
30mm. From the simulation results in Fig. 7, we can
know that short loaded antennas have low efficiency,
especially in the range of 1-30GHz. Then, the
efficiency becomes high and the flatness becomes
good by increasing antenna length. And the 25mm
loaded dipole antenna has the best performance.
3.2.2 Optimization for Surface Resistance
In order to obtain the optimal loaded antenna, the
surface resistance is changed in this section.
Antenna length is set as optimal value, 25mm. Fig. 8
depict the frequency response with different
resistance. First, we change the resistance around
400Ω, as shown in Fig. 8(a). It can be seen that there
are several resonance points within 1-40GHz, and
resonance characteristic becomes weak by
increasing resistance. Then, we continue to increase
resistance. Fig. 8(b) shows that the efficiency
becomes low within the range of 1-30GHz and
becomes high within the range of 30-40GHz when
the resistance increases. And now the trend of S11
curves is close to the ideal antenna.