Mood and Investment Decision-Making: An Experimental Study
Ardianto
Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Airlangga,
Jalan Airlangga No. 4 6, Surabaya, Indonesia
ardianto@feb.unair.ac.id
Keywords: Decision-Making, Experimental, Investment, Mood.
Abstract: Investment decision-making involves strategic decisions that have a long-term impact and that can affect a
significant amount of funds. Investment decision-making also involves risk. The aim of this experimental
study is to determine whether the moods of prospective investors have an effect on their decision making.
Using final-semester students who have taken the financial statement analysis course as the subjects, this
study determines whether any changes in decisions occur in conjunction with the transformation of the
subject’s mood. Several previous studies have studied the influence of financial report framing on
investment decisions. In contrast to previous research, however, this study pays more attention to the
subjects who make the decisions. The results of this study show that, in a business situation with the same
prospects, an investor with a positive mood will have the desire to make larger investments, compared to an
investor who is in a negative mood. In this way, it can be proven that mood is related to investment
decisions. This study also shows that gender (masculine vs. feminine) does not have a moderating effect on
the relationship between mood and investment decision.
1 INTRODUCTION
Investment decision-making is very risky and
requires a lot of funds. Accuracy in investment
decision-making has a long-term impact and
involves considerable value for money. Some of the
major cases where investment decisions have failed
have proved the magnitude of the impact on the
company. In contrast to previous research, this study
focuses more on the effect that the conditions the
subject (or decision maker) experiences can affect
the decisions they make. There have been various
investigations into the level of courage a decision
maker has. Some test the influence had by
differences in financial report framing on the results
of investment decisions (Powell and Ansic, 1997;
Sandeep et al., 2012). Unlike previous research,
however, this study examines how the conditions
experienced by the subject (the decision maker) can
affect the decision he or she makes.
This study only considers whether a happy mood
may have an impact by causing greater optimism,
which further affects the determination of higher
investment rates. However, this study’s aim is to
prove whether a feeling of optimism when making
decisions can be caused by an antecedent that has
created a happy mood. Regardless of the accuracy of
the decisions, this research has proved that a happy
atmosphere can affect the magnitude of investment
decisions; this proof could inspire further research to
prove the effect of mood on accuracy in decision
making.
There are other studies that have also proved that
happiness is a requirement for people to work hard
and thereby become successful. Happiness can bring
an optimistic feeling, release stress, achieve a goal
more aggressively and face a situation more calmly.
Conditions of happiness can be a driving force that
will cause someone to work harder in order to
achieve success.
The empirical evidence suggests that this is not
the case, however. Indeed, a number of researchers
and thinkers have argued that the ability to be happy
and contented with life is a central criterion for the
ability to adapt and for positive mental health
(Diener, 1984; Jahoda, 1958; Taylor and Brown,
1988).
The experimental designs used in this study, in
addition to showing the main effect of causal
relationships between happiness and the value of
investment decisions, can also simultaneously see
Ardianto, .
Mood and Investment Decision-Making: An Experimental Study.
In Proceedings of the Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics Symposium 2018 on Special Session for Indonesian Study (JCAE 2018) - Contemporary Accounting Studies in
Indonesia, pages 189-193
ISBN: 978-989-758-339-1
Copyright © 2018 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved
189
the effect of gender on the link between the variable
happiness and the value of the investments.
2 LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Happiness
Psychology literature contains no universal
definition of happiness. Happiness is a subjective
condition felt by someone who is experiencing
satisfaction with life, contentment and wellbeing
(Ryan and Deci, 2001). According to Kahneman
(1999), in order to know whether someone is happy
or not, they should be cognitively evaluated. This
means that, in order to determine whether someone
is in a happy condition or not, this needs to be self-
determined by the subject.
2.2 Optimism
Various research in the literature states that
happiness fosters optimism. Circular conditions can
occur where, in the end, optimism will also result in
success and will ultimately return and impact on
levels of happiness.
Optimism or positive thinking is the key to
success and happiness. Research has also shown that
positive thinking can reduce the pressure of
increasing emotional wellbeing and cardiovascular
health (Wellner and Adox, 2000).
Optimism is how someone reacts to social failure
in their life (Myers, 2008). A stressful situation
experienced by an individual can result in a loss of
willingness to make an effort. The existence of
optimism can change the negative feeling in order to
achieve maximum results. According to McGinnis
(1995) people who are optimistic have 12 defining
characteristics, as follows:
1. Optimistic people are rarely surprised by
difficulty.
2. Optimistic people look to problem-solve.
3. Optimists feel confident that they have control
over their futures.
4. Optimistic people give regular updates.
5. Optimistic people put a stop to their negative
thoughts.
6. Optimism increases the power of appreciation.
7. Optimists use their imagination to train for
success.
8. Optimists are always happy, even when they do
not feel happy.
9. Optimists feel confident that they have an almost
unlimited ability to extend themselves.
10. Optimists foster lots of love in their lives.
11. Optimists like to exchange good news.
12. Optimists accept what cannot be changed.
Optimistic individuals will tend to be confident
about their decisions and in their abilities. Chang
(2002) defines optimism as an individual
expectation of good things. In other words, optimists
are individuals who expect good events to happen in
their future lives.
Scheier and Carver (2002) state that optimism is
the dispositional tendency of individuals to have
positive expectations overall, even though they may
face misfortune or difficulties in life.
Optimism is an attitude of always having good
expectations of everything and the tendency to
expect a pleasant outcome. In other words, optimism
is a way of thinking or a paradigm of positive
thinking (Carver and Scheier, 1993).
Scheier and Carter also state that an optimist is a
person who has good expectations of their future
lives. Their futures include positive goals and
expectations that cover all aspects of life (as cited in
Snyder, 2002).
2.3 Gender
Gender is theoretically different from biological sex
in how it distinguishes between men and women. In
this study, gender measurement is conducted using a
traditional concept. This concept measures gender
on a continuum, going from very masculine up to
very feminine.
Gender concepts have evolved. The gender
dimension now not only splits issues into a
masculine vs. feminine dichotomy; rather, each
continuum can also be separated into stages between
“very masculine” and “not very masculine”.
However, there are no degrees to feminine
measurement at all, until very feminine.
Considering the simplicity and focus of this
research (in that it only considers aspects of
behavioral research in accounting) it uses a
traditional measurement of gender. This only
considers the traits of masculine versus feminine
behavior, comparing very masculine conditions to
those that are very feminine.
JCAE Symposium 2018 Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics Symposium 2018 on Special Session for Indonesian Study
190
3 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
This study used an two-by-two between-subjects
experimental design, using the final-year students as
research subjects. Student subjects were used
because this study measures variables that have
transferable properties. Students and investors will
actually behave similarly when they receive equal
treatment. This condition means that the students, as
subjects, can stand in for investors. Additionally, the
experience factor is controlled during this research.
The focus of the observations in this study is the
feeling of happiness itself. Thus, the study tests
happiness’s influence on the amount of investments
made by the subject. In order to create two groups to
act as a treatment group and control group, the 24
subjects were randomly separated by filling out the
questionnaires, answering items that asked them
about their moods.
The establishment of groups of subjects who had
happy and unhappy moods was achieved through
these questionnaires. The questionnaire contained a
choice of statements to be filled by the selected
subjects according to their mood. Option 1 means
the respondents are happy, while option 2 means that
they are unhappy. Subsequently, subjects who
identified as being happy were asked to enter a
particular room (Room A), while those subjects who
identified as being unhappy were asked to enter
another room (Room B). Subject groups in both
rooms were then assigned the same investment
decision-making task, with the same data. The only
difference was in the subjects’ moods.
3.1 Variable Measurement
3.1.1 Mood
Mood is measured by identifying the psychological
nature of the subject (i.e., whether they are happy or
unhappy. By enabling self-assessment through the
use of a single-item scale (the question: "Are you
generally happy right now?") the subject’s answer
can be measured on a scale of 0 to 10.
According to Kahneman (1999) in order to
ascertain whether someone is happy or not a
cognitive evaluation is necessary. In other words, if
we wish to determine whether a person is in a happy
condition or not, their answer needs to be self-
determined. The validity of using this single-scale
measurement has been studied by Abdel (2006),
who states that: [a] single item [scale] had a good
convergent validity because it was highly and
positively correlated with optimism, hope, self
esteem, positive effect, extraversion, and self ratings
of both physical and mental health. Single scale is
reliable, valid, and viable in community surveys as
well as in cross-cultural comparison.
3.1.2 Gender
In this study, gender measurement uses a traditional
concept that measures gender on a very masculine
continuum, going up to very feminine. Using the
question instrument that identifies characteristics
from very masculine to very feminine, subjects
will be identified according to their gender status.
Gender measurements in this study still use
the gender role identity. This concept refers to the
comparison of characteristics according to gender-
related social norms and gender-related
characteristics. This concept was originally
developed by Kagan (1964).
3.1.3 Investment Decisions
The investment decisions were measured using a
question instrument that consisted of several
investment decisions ranging from Rp. 1 Billion to
Rp. 10 Billion, thus indicating the boldness of the
investment made by the subject.
4 RESULTS
4.1 Descriptive Statistics
Table 1: Descriptive Statistics
Mood
Gender
Mean
Std.
Deviation
N
Happy
2.20
7.0000
.
1
2.40
9.0000
.
1
2.60
8.0000
.
1
3.00
8.6667
2.30940
3
3.20
9.5000
.70711
2
3.60
7.0000
1.41421
2
3.80
10.0000
.00000
2
Total
8.5833
1.56428
12
Unhappy
2.40
5.0000
.
1
2.80
8.0000
.
1
Mood and Investment Decision-Making: An Experimental Study
191
3.00
5.0000
2.82843
2
3.20
5.0000
.
1
3.40
1.0000
.
1
3.60
4.0000
2.64575
3
3.80
7.0000
.
1
4.20
6.0000
1.41421
2
Total
5.0000
2.29624
12
Table 2: Levene’s Test
df1
df2
Sig.
14
9
.036
Levene’s test addresses the null
hypothesis that the error variance of
the dependent variable is equal across
groups.
a. Design: Intercept + Kelompok +
Gender + Kelompok * Gender
Table 3: Examination of the Subject Effect
Dependent Variable: Investment
Source
Type III
Sum of
Squares
df
Mean
Square
F
Sig.
Partial Eta
Squared
Noncent.
Parameter
Corrected
Model
124.792
a
14
8.914
2.158
.124
.771
30.219
Intercept
825.756
1
825.756
199.959
.000
.957
199.959
Mood
49.504
1
49.504
11.988
.007
.571
11.988
Gender
47.068
9
5.230
1.266
.365
.559
11.398
Mood *
Gender
1.284
4
.321
.078
.987
.033
.311
Error
37.167
9
4.130
Total
1269.000
24
Corrected
Total
161.958
23
a. R Squared = .771 (Adjusted R-squared = .414)
b. Computed using alpha = .05
By using an error rate of 5%, Table 3 shows a
significant difference in the level of significance,
with a 0.007 increase on the investment value score
given by the group of happy subjects, compared to
that given by the group of unhappy subjects. This
means that mood differences affect the value of the
investment made by the subject.
However, gender differences (masculine vs.
feminine) do not affect the strength of the
relationship between mood and the value of the
investment made by the subject.
5 CONCLUSIONS
The results show that happy subjects tend to make
higher-value investment decisions than subjects who
are in unhappy moods. From these results, it can be
concluded that mood affects the size of the
investment made by the individual.
The implications of this study provide an insight
into the concept that investment decisions are
influenced by a person's emotional changes. This
indicates the importance of an investor’s mental
state when making an investment decision. Although
this study does not look at the end result of the
investment, the influence of an individual’s mental
state on their decision making has been proven in
this study.
Interaction effect testing shows there is no
moderate effect of gender on the strength of the
relationship between mood and the value of the
investment made. Thus, it can be concluded that
gender characteristics do not affect the strength of
the relationship that exists between mood and the
value of the investment made by the subject.
Subjects that show feminine and masculine gender
JCAE Symposium 2018 Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics Symposium 2018 on Special Session for Indonesian Study
192
characteristics still experience a significant influence
that is not different in strength.
REFERENCES
Abdel, Khalek A.M., 2006. Measuring Happiness
with A Si ngle Item Scale. Social Behavior and
Personality.
Chang, E. C. (2002). Cultural influences on
optimism and pessimism: Differences in Western
and Eastern construals of the self. In E. C. Chang
(Ed.), Optimism and pessimism: Implications for
theory, research, and practice (pp. 257−280).
Washington, DC: American Psychological
Association.
Diener, E., 1984. Subjective well-being.
Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542-575.
Hasnain, N., Wazid, S.W., Hasan, Z., 2014.
Optimism, Hope, and Happiness as Correlates of
Psychological Well Being among Young Adult
Assamese Males and Females. IOSR Journal Of
Humanities And Social Science Vol 19 PP 44-
51.
Jahoda, M., 1958. Current concepts of positive
mental health. New York: Basic Books.
Kahneman, D., Diener, E., Schwarz, N., 1999. Well
Being: The Foundation of Hedonic Psychology.
New York: russel Sagr Found.
Mishra, S., Gregson, M., Lalumiere M.L., 2012.
Framming effect and Risk Sensitive Decision
Making. British Journal of Psychology.
Ryan, R.M., Deci, E.L., 2001. On Happiness and
Human Potentials: A Review of Research on
Hedonic and Eudaimonic Well Being.
Annu.Rev.Psychol. 2001.52:141
Scheier, M. F., Carver, C. S., and Bridges, M. W.
(2001). Optimism, pessimism, and psychological
well-being. In E. C. Chang (Ed.), Optimism and
pessimism: Implications for theory, research, and
practice (pp. 189−216). Washington, DC:
American Psychological Association.
Taylor, S. E., Brown, J. D., 1988. Illusion and well-
being: A social psychological perspective on
mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193-
210.
Mood and Investment Decision-Making: An Experimental Study
193