intellectual sports training, resulting in the
identification and manifestation of certain
relationships and interdependence of all sides of the
sports activities. Motivational sphere defines the
orientation of an individual towards the realization
of the set goals as its achievement is an incentive for
more complex remote goals, the achievement of
which requires the mobilization of motor and
vegetative functions, and participation in psycho-
emotional sphere, as volitional potential has an
important role in the implementation of the
objectives.
The effectiveness of the educational activities is
determined by several factors and conditions
accounting for the implementation of which ensures
the performance of the educational work. Sport has a
high educational potential; however, its use involves
thorough understanding of the educational influence
mechanism. This is the main reason for insufficient
use of sport as the leading means of educational
influence.
To assess the coherence of the trainer and the
athlete objectives; improve the dynamics of a coach
and athlete personal characteristics; the degree of the
educational process individualization we have
developed evaluation criteria, allowing to reveal the
dynamics of relevant indicators for assessing the
nature of relations between the subjects of the
educational process.
Before the pedagogical experiment the initial
level of relations between elements of the system
"coach-athlete" in the studied conditions was
assessed. Analysis of the results showed no
significant differences in the level of educational
activities athletes personal characteristics
manifestation that determine the nature of their
relationship (p>0.05). After the pedagogical
experiment re-assessment of the coach and athlete
relations formation was carried out using the same
criteria. The findings suggested that the indices
improved in both groups: CG and EG. However, in
the EG due to the implementation of the
fundamental principles that determine the nature of
cooperation between the coach and athlete; practical
implementation of the basic provisions, the level of
educational activities and periodic use of evaluation
criteria educational influences the nature of the
relationship between the coach and the athlete has
reached a qualitatively new level.
So, when assessing the coherence and unity
of the purpose the coach and the athlete in the
CG – 2,72±0,11 points to the end of the pedagogical
experiment showed improvement and made up
2.97±0.11 points (p>0.05); in the EG, respectively,
with initial data of 2.69±0.08 points by the end of
the pedagogical experiment the indices improved to
3.56±0.10 points (p<0.05). When the source data of
the athlete personal characteristics manifestations in
the CG 3,15±0,16 points to the completion of the
pedagogical experiment indicators improved and
amounted to 3,41±0.09 points (p>0.05); in the EG,
respectively, with initial data of 3.17±0.11 points
after the pedagogical experiment the studied
parameters increased to 4.29±0.15 score (p<0.05).
When evaluating the source of the data
manifestations of educational process
individualization in the CG – 3,09±0,17 points to the
end of the pedagogical experiment the results
improved to 3.33±0.11 points (p>0.05); in the EG,
respectively, with initial data of 3.07±0,16 points to
the end of the pedagogical experiment the results
increased to 4.43±0.18 points (p<0.05).
4 CONCLUSIONS
The results of the pedagogical experiment showed
that the character of relationships between elements
of the system "coach–athlete" significantly affects
the efficiency of sports training system, because it
determines the psycho-emotional state of the
training process, subjects, performance, creative
attitude to sports activities. The process of
education, based on the regularities of personality
development and growth of sports skill should be
based on the fundamental principles of rational
interaction and the relationship between the coach
and the athlete. Methodological provisions that
establish the performance of educational activities
must be considered: awareness of the self-education
importance as a structural component of sports
training; unity of the coach and athlete purposes;
ensuring positive dynamics of the athlete personal
characteristics improvement indicators;
understanding individual focus of the educational
process as the basis of the coach and the athlete
rational relationship establishing.
REFERENCES
Aganyans E. K., Gorskaya G. B. Pedagogicheskoe
obosnovanie povedenija cheloveka [in Russian].
Krasnodar, Ekoinvest, 2003, 114 p.
Kolesnik I. S. Increasing professionalism coach as one of
the leading factors in the growth of sports skill
athletes. Teorija praktika fizicheskoj kul'tury [in
Russian], 2005, no. 5, pp. 36-37.