Trianto (2008) states that the contextual approach is a
concept that helps teachers learn the link between
what is taught with real-world situations students and
encourage students to make connections between the
knowledge possessed by the application of their lives
as members of the family and society. Based on the
understanding of contextual approach can be
concluded that the contextual approach lead students
to learn from the knowledge they get and connected
in everyday life. Contextual learning emphasizes
students to learn in their entirety so that the
information and knowledge that students have
encountered can be absorbed well and last a long
time. With this concept, the expected learning
outcomes more meaningful for students. The learning
process takes place naturally in the form of students
work activities and experience, not a transfer of
knowledge from teacher to student. Learning
strategies more important than learning outcomes.
2 RESEARCH METHODS
Development models used in developing the thematic
teaching materials of Elementary School in fourth
grade Subtheme Hidup Rukun is Borg and Gall
Model. According to Borg and Gall (1983) Research
and Development (Research and Development) is a
process used to develop and validate the products that
will be developed.
Method of research and development includes
several phases: research and information gathering,
planning, development of an early draft of the
product, testing experts that media experts, linguists,
experts learning technology and expert thematic,
revision expert testing, trials and small-scale field
trials
This research was conducted at five primary
schools in Tulungagung that implement Curriculum
2013 class IV Subtheme Rukun Life in The
Community, it took place in SDN I Campurdarat,
SDN I Boyolangu, SDN I Pucungkidul, SDN I Beji,
and SDN I Sobontoro. The samples in this research
was grade IV selected by purposive sampling. The
design used in this research is pretest and posttest
design.
According Sugiyono (2014: 111) the structure of
the design of this research as follows:
Figure 1: Research Design Pretest-Posttest.
Explanation: O₁ = Score Pretest (before the use of
teaching materials), O₂ = Score Posttest (after the use
of teaching materials), x = treatment with contextual-
based teaching materials.
The data in this research was obtained from the
pretest and posttest scores were analyzed statistically
with Paired Samples T-Test. The qualitative data
obtained from the results of observations, interviews,
and student activity during the learning process were
analyzed and explained descriptively.
3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Teaching materials was validated by expert media,
expert thematic learning, teachers as practitioners,
and students to determine the attractiveness of the
teaching materials. Assessment carried out by the
expert content aspect of thematic learning and Social
Sciences who received a score of 89.63% and
84.75%. Design materials judged by media experts
which its score was 73.33%, practitioners assess the
feasibility of teaching materials which scored
94.98%, while the attractiveness of the material
showed a score of 89.15%. Results of student
questionnaire responses to determine the
attractiveness of the teaching materials once used by
86.5% of students showed achievement criteria very
feasible and can be implemented. Students also
provide suggestions and comments related to the use
of teaching materials. Student comments and
suggestions as follows: (1) contextual based teaching
materials easy for me to learn, (2) the my score
becomes better using the teaching materials, (3) I love
to learn about Tulungagung. It can be concluded that
the field trials, students very interested in using
contextual-based thematic teaching materials.
On the activity of students in using the materials
showed that only 12 students who obtain an average
score below 80%, while 131 students grades average
above 80%. Activities of students when working on
sheet student activity has a percentage of 91.6%. It
can be concluded that the criteria of student activity
was in very active category.
In testing these materials besides to see the score
of student activity in doing of teaching materials, the
researchers also see the results of student learning by
providing evaluation questions at the end of sub-
themes. Based on the data obtained from the results
of student learning that students who have rated 91-
100 as many as 42 students or 29.38%. Then students
who received grades 81-90 as many as 89 students or
62.24%. While as many as 9 students or 6.29% gain
value range 71-80. And 3 students or 2.09% scored
Contextual Based Development of Teaching Materials Subtheme Rukun Life in the Community
91