Based on the table of tests of Between-Subject
effects we can see that line the independent variable
(in this case teaching method finds an F-value of the
effect of teaching method 10.781 and column
labeled Sig the value is .002 where it is less than 0.05
(an alternative alpha level). It means that two groups,
experimental and control groups differ significantly.
In pre-test line found an F-value of the effect of
pre-test 45.674 and column sig, the value is 0.000.
This is less than 0.01, therefore the covariate is
significant. This value also indicates 44.5% of
variance in the dependent variable (partial eta squared
of 0.445 multiplied by 100).
The result of students’ vocabulary progress could
be seen from pre-test and post-test from each group.
The computation of control group pre-test and post
test scores using test of Between-Subjects Effect
showed that there is significant difference between
two groups in the post test scores. Meanwhile, the
result showed that the students in the experimental
group achieve better result in the post test. The
improvement was statistical significant if it was
compared their pre-test scores. The statistical
computation results exhibited a significant fact that
picture is effective in improving students’ vocabulary
mastery.
The computation of mean scores in the
experimental showed that the pre-test score was 84.53
and after treatment using picture with 50 vocabulary
was given the post test score was 87.60, the
improvement reached 3.07. while in the control
group the mean of pre-test was 84.73 and after
treatment using conventional method (read a text)
was given, the post test score was 82.80, it means that
the post-test score was decreasing 1.93 from the pre-
test.
4.4 Testing Hypothesis
For testing hypothesis, the writer want to know
whether Ho was accepted or rejected. To meet the
hypothesis above, the statistical analysis of ancova
was applied in this research to decide how far the
mean of pre-test score is different from the post test
score; both in group itself and between groups with
the level of significance of 0.05. The significance of
the test was analyzed by using computer program
In table of tests of between-subject effects line
teaching method shows that the value of F-value is
10.781 and the significant value is 0.002. Thus, it can
be concluded that both of experimental group and
control group different significantly. It means that the
researcher hypothesis (Hi) is accepted and the (Ho) is
rejected. Thus, it is concluded that using picture is
more effective than conventional method in teaching
vocabulary at elementary school.
5 CONCLUSIONS
After the researcher gave the pre-test, treatment and
post-test to the students, it is concluded that the
students who taught using picture have better
vocabulary than the students who taught without
picture (conventional teaching). But, to reach the
purpose of this research, we must give all the
vocabularies (the words about countable and
uncountable noun) to the students, because it will give
influence in students’ post-test. So it made the
teaching is more effective in teaching vocabulary.
They teaching vocabulary using picture will be
success if the researcher is required to follow the
general specific procedures, such as: specifying the
topic, defining the students’ group and pairs and the
rules to treatment.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I would like to thanks to God “Allah SWT” for
blessing and mercy and Rector of Kadiry University,
so this Research can be finally finished. I get idea on
conducting this Research to fullfill the requirement
for the International Journal presented by Kanjuruhan
University.
REFERENCES
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Sorensen, C., Razavich, A., 2002.
Introduction to Research in Education, Wadsworth
Group. United States of America.
Brown, H. D., 2004. Language assessmentPrinciples and
Classroom activities, Pearson Education. Inc. U.S.A.
Brown, H. D., 2007. Teaching by principles: an interactive
Approach to Language Pedagogy, San Fransisco State
University. U. S. A.
Gerlach, V. S., Ely, P., 1980. Teachingand Media: A
Systematic Approach, Prentice Hall. New Jersey.
Nagaraj, G., 1996. English Lanuage Teaching: Approaches,
Methods, and Technique, Orient Longman, Ltd.
London.
Suyanto, K. K. E., 2007. English for Young Learners, Bumi
Aksara. Jakarta.
The Effectiveness of Using Picture to Teach Vocabulary at Elementary School
371