is compatible and supported with the teachers
knowledge about pedagogic (Li, 2017).
Qualification data is gotten from two experts of
material and media, and one Junior High School
physics teacher. The data gotten is qualitative and
quantitative data. The quantitative data is gotten by
answer sheet of module by using likert scale and to
know the qualification of module. While qualitative
data is gotten is the suggestion used to revise module.
The result of learning modul qualification can be
shown on Table 3.
Table 3: The result of Qualification Component Analyzis of
Learning Module Content.
From the trial test of XI MIPA SMA Negeri 6
Malang class is gotten quantitative data and
qualitative data. Quantitative data is taken from
answer sheet of the students toward the module by
using gutman scale while quantitative data is taken
from students suggestion. The result of trial test is
shown in Table 4.
Table 4: The response analyze result of Learning Module.
Concept map based on
material
Concept map to make the
easy memorizing the
material
Concept map for material
for easy understanding
The problem appear is the
real daily problem
The problem appear
based on the material
discussion
The problem appear need
analyze and
understanding of previous
material
The practice make the
material easier to
understand
Material appearance is
suitable with the problem
appearance
Content and writing style
of module give
impression of the module
is useful to know
The exercises of task
make understanding of
material well
The task is suitable with
the material
The content of the module is very important for
the learning process. The language improvement and
content give a strong contribution for students reading
capability (Pollard-Durodola, 2016). So it is
important for having a book or a module based on the
teachers and students needed.
4 CONCLUSION
The quality of physics module based on the Novick
learning with thermo dynamic theme of validator has
good quality and based on the students response also
got the agree category. The module is hoped can
support the students in learning physics and help the
teachers to improve the critical thinking of the
students.
REFERENCES
A. Z. Gülten, “Am I Planning well? Teacher Trainees’
Voices on Lesson Planning,” Procedia - Soc. Behav.
Sci., vol. 93, no. 2010, pp. 1409–1413, 2013.
A. Castle, “Defining and assessing critical thinking skills
for student radiographers,” Radiography, vol. 15, no. 1,
pp. 70–76, 2009.
C. Huda, S. D. Aji, M. N. Hudha, and F. Gamat, “Inquiry /
Discovery-Based Instruction to Improve Critical
Thinking Skills and Mastery of Physics Concepts,” vol.
173, no. Icei 2017, pp. 66–68, 2018.
D. Ratnaningdyah, “Penerapan Model Pembelajaran
Novick Dipadukan Dengan Strategi Cooperative
Problem Solving ( Cps ) Untuk,” J. Wahana Pendidik.
Fis., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 63–67, 2017.
E. Moxley, L. Maturin, and K. Rakstang, “NCLEX-RN??
Success: An Integrative Lesson Plan,” Teach. Learn.
Nurs., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 161–164, 2017.
K. Larsson, “Understanding and teaching critical
thinking—A new approach,” Int. J. Educ. Res., vol. 84,
no. December 2016, pp. 32–42, 2017.
M. Ardiansyah and Y. K. Ali, “Penerapan Model
Pembelajaran Novick Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil
Belajar Fisika Pada Siswa Kelas X SMA Negeri 1
ANCOSH 2018 - Annual Conference on Social Sciences and Humanities
468