Degradation of Di-N-Butyl Phthalate by Microbacterium Aoyamense
Atpm-11 Isolated from Waste Water Treatment Plant
Ke Zhang
*
, Wei Chen and Jia Chen
College of Civil Engineering, Sichuan Agricultural University, Dujiangyan,Sichuan, 611830, China
Email: zhangke@sicau.edu.cn
Keywords: Di-n-butyl phthalate (DBP), microbacterium aoyamense ATPM-11, biodegradation, characteristics
Abstract: An efficient di-n-butyl phthalate bacterial strain ATPM-11 was isolated from activated sludge of waste water
treatment plant (WWTP). Based on its morphological, physiobiochemical characteristics and 16S rRNA
gene sequence, strain ATPM-11 was identified as Microbacterium aoyamense sp. The degradation
characteristics were investigated under different environmental conditions. The results showed that the
optimal temperature and pH for DBP degradation by ATPM-11 was 25 ℃ and 8.0, respectively. Under
these conditions, ATPM-11 could effectively degraded more than 83% of DBP at 400 mg/L. The diversity
of degradable substrates showed that strain ATPM-11 could degrade phthalate (DMP), DEP and DOP
efficiently. Therefore, this bacterial strain has potential to be used in DBP bioremediation.
1 INTRODUCTION
Phthalic acid esters (PAEs), one of the synthetic
organic compounds, are the wildly used and a higher
productivity as plasticizers, adhesive, additives,
paint solvent and Printing inks in the world (Li et al.,
2005). However, with the broad use of plastic
products, the phthalic acid esters abound in the
environment and they can migrate into the soil and
rainwater, thus enter the water system, which may
harm aquatic organisms and human health (Bai et al.,
2012). Di-methyl phthalate (DMP), di-n-butyl
phthalate (DBP) and di-n-octyl phthalate (DOP)
have been listed as priority pollutants by China
National Environmental Monitoring Center and the
US Environmental Protection Agency (Wang et al.,
2008). PAEs can be degraded by chemical and
physical methods, but microbial technology was
regarded as the most efficient way duo to it high
efficiency and low toxicity (Wan, 2012). The
hydrolysis and photolysis of DBP in the natural
environment are very slow and are difficult to
degrade. The physical method mainly consists of
humic acid or activated carbon adsorption, relying
on the strong pore structure and adsorption capacity
of adsorbent to remove DBP in water (Li et al.,
2013). The chemical method is mainly
photocatalytic degradation, which is the removal of
DBP in water by ultraviolet light. Although physical
and chemical methods have a good effect on the
removal of DBP in water body, there are obvious
defects, such as the final destination of DBP
attached to the adsorbent. In comparison, the
biological method is low cost and high efficient.
(Guo et al., 2007; Ding, 2012; Zheng et al., 2007)
Presently, several PAEs-degrading bacterial
strains belonging to the Gordonia sp.( Sarkar et al.,
2013), Enterobacter sp.( Fang et al., 2010) and
Arthrobacter sp.( Wen et al., 2014). They can be
isolated from different environments, while their
degrading efficiencies in other PAEs were low and
far from meeting the actual pollution control
requirements.Therefore, in order to improve the
biodegradation rate of phthalate esters, it’s necessary
to isolate highly effective degradation bacteria(Li et
al., 2014).
In the study, a DBP-degrading bacterium was
isolated from active sludge and identified by 16S
rDNA sequence. The biodegradation kinetics and
different environmental factors affecting this process
were investigated.And this study is expected to
improve current understanding of the bioremediation
of DBP and find higher effective DBP-dergading
strains.