Figure 5 is variation of arc voltage with time at different polarities. When W probe is anode and
copper specimen is cathode, off-line arc is mainly metallic vapour state. When arc is in metallic
vapour state, charged particles are produced by ionization of metallic vapour. Metallic vapour is
easily ionized due to low ionization voltage, so a great deal of charged particles can keep arc burning
strongly and help current-carrying efficiency increase. However charged particles which are
produced by metallic vapour are heavy and move slowly, thus arc heat concentrates and arc erosion
gets serious. When W probe is cathode and copper specimen is anode, off-line arc quickly turns into
gas state. When arc is in gas state, air takes part in ionization. Charged particles are ionized
difficultly because of high ionization voltage of air, thus arc burns weakly. Charged particles which
are produced by air are light and move quickly, thus arc heat disperses and arc erosion is alleviated.
5. Conclusions
Electric erosion of current-carrying arc was distinctly different at different polarities.
The forming mechanisms of charged particles were different at different polarities. When W
probe was anode and copper specimen was cathode, W probe produces anode ions by
thermal ionization and copper specimen emitted electrons by thermal emission and electric
field emission; When W probe was cathode and copper specimen was anode, W probe emits
electrons by emitted electrons by thermal emission and copper specimen produced anode
ions by electric field emission.
Arc state was different at different polarities. When W probe was anode and copper
specimen was cathode, current-carrying arc was mainly metallic vapor state and thus arc
burned easily but erosion was serious; When W probe was cathode and copper specimen was
anode, current-carrying arc was mainly gas state and thus arc burned difficultly but erosion
was light.
Proper match between polarity and physical properties of electric friction couples can
alleviate erosion and improve electric transmission. The study provides theory support for
proposal of electric arc power collection system.
References
[1] Gao Z B, Wu G N, Lu W, He C H, Zhou L and J 2009 Research review of arc phenomenon
between pantograph and catenary in high-speed electrified railway High Voltage Apparatus
45:104-108
[2] Lei D, Wu G N, Zhang X Y, Wang W G and He C H 2008 Research of a method of inhibition
of electric arc between pantograph and catenary in high-speed electrified railway Electric
Railway 5:1-4
[3] Holm R 1967 Electric Contacts Germany: Springer-Verlag 7
[4] Zaidi H., Chin K J and Frene J 2001 Analysis of surface and subsurface of sliding electrical
contact steel/steel in magnetic Surface and Coatings Technology 148: 241-250
[5] Fisher J C and Giaever I 1961 Tunneling through thin insulating layers Journal of Applied
Physics 32(2): 172-177
[6] Mansori M EI, Paulmier D, Ginsztler J and Horvath M 1999 Lubrication mechanisms of a
soliding contact by simultaneous action of electric current and magnetic field Wear
225~229:1011-1016
[7] Wang Y A, Li J X, Yan Y and Qiao L J 2012 Effect of electrical current on tribological
behavior of copper-impregnated metalized carbon against a Cu-Cr-Zr alloy Tribology
International 50:26-34
[8] Csapo E, Zaidi H and Paulmier D 1996 Friction behavior of a graphite-graphite dynamic
electric contact in the presence of argon Wear 192:151-156
[9] Shunichi K and Koji K 1999 Effect of arc discharge on the wear rate and wear mode transition
IWMCE 2018 - International Workshop on Materials, Chemistry and Engineering
362