RE element atoms in modifier are combined with O、S element atoms in molten steel to form
compounds, which can be used as the nucleus of austenite nucleation, as shown in Figure 3(a). On
the other hand, the decomposition of amorphous particles releases a large latent heat of
crystallization, causing the temperature gradient field near the austenite interface to change, which
greatly improves the constitutional supercooling state, the growth of dendritic austenite is inhibited
greatly as shown in Figure 3(b). The release of latent heat of crystallization increases the temperature
of austenite front, thereby improving the segregation state of C and the alloy atoms and promoting
the growth of granular austenite. At the same time, the non equilibrium solidification condition is
improved. And as the surface active element, rare earth element is easy to adsorb on austenite surface
and change energy distribution (as shown in Figure 3(c)). When austenite is crystallized, the surface
energy of each crystal face is different, and crystal surface (hkl)1 with low surface energy retained,
and crystal surface (hkl)2 of high surface energy gradually disappeared in austenite grain growth
process. However, because of the preferential adsorption of RE elements, the energy difference of
each crystal face is reduced under the condition of amorphous modification, so that the austenite
grows in granular form [23].
It can be expected that when the amorphous modifier content is relatively small (such as
0.1wt.%), the effect of the RE elements such as stimulating nucleation, improving the constitutional
supercooling and inhibiting dendrite growth is not prominent. When the content of amorphous
modifier is appropriate amount of 0.2wt.%, the RE elements play a significant role. However, when
the content of modifier is large (such as 0.3wt.%), the effect of modifier can not be demonstrated
because of its large amount of thermal energy released during decomposition, which increases the
overall temperature of solidification system and changes the solidification conditions.
Figure 4 shows the tensile strength and impact toughness values of different treated samples. The
tensile strength and impact toughness of the unmodified samples are 750 MPa and 1.5J/cm
2
.
However, the tensile strength and toughness of crystalline modified are obviously improved, with the
values of 1050MPa and 8J/cm
2
, respectively, 40% and 433.3% higher than that of unmodified.
It can be observed from Figure 4 that the tensile strength and impact toughness of the amorphous
modified samples are higher than those of unmodified and crystalline modified samples. It is worth
noting that the tensile strength and impact toughness of the samples vary with the amorphous
modifier content. When the the amorphous modifier content is in a low amount (0.1wt.%) or higher
(0.3wt.%), the two values are both lower than that of amorphous modifier content at 0.2wt.%, are
1340 MPa and 11.5 J/cm
2
.
The microstructure of unmodified test steels is mainly composed of skeletal pearlite matrix and a
coarse network shape modified ledeburite as shown in Figure 1(a). Under the action of external load,
the ledeburite carbides directly as fracture of crack source and crack propagation channel, making the
material tensile strength and impact toughness reduced.
However, due to the effect of RE modifier, the dendritic austenite precipitation is restrained after
crystalline modification. Meanwhile, the eutectic ledeburite network structure is broken and becomes
isolated islands or block structure. As a result, the impact toughness is significantly improved.
The amorphous modifier, which has a significant effect in the inhibition of dendritic austenite and
eutectic ledeburite precipitation, especially in a suitable amount, (such as 0.2wt.%), austenite is
precipitated in the form of particles and the formation of eutectic ledeburite is basically suppressed.
So that the steel reaches a high level of tensile strength and impact toughness. Experimental results
show that the tensile strength reaches 1340MPa, which is 78.67% and 27.62% higher than that of
unmodified and crystalline modification samples respectively. And the impact toughness reaches
11.5J/cm
2
, which is higher than that of unmodified and crystalline modification samples respectively,
increased by 666.67% and 43.75%.
Reported in the literature [15], the crystalline RE modified UHCS experienced secondary heat
treatment, its impact toughness value reached 12.5J/cm
2
. This is equivalent to the experimental