mixture, which reflect the flexibility of asphalt
mixture to some extent. Generally speaking, the
smaller the bending stiffness, flexible of asphalt
mixture under cold condition, the better.
In conclusion, the low temperature bending
strength and bending strain of SBS/SBR co-
composited modified asphalt mixture are both larger,
the low temperature stiffness modulus of SBS/SBR
co-composited modified asphalt mixture is smaller.
4 CONCLUSIONS
As for the low temperature bending strength of
asphalt mixture, the composite modified asphalt has
the advantages of SBS modified asphalt and SBR
modified asphalt, and the low temperature resistance
of composite modified asphalt mixture is the best;As
for the low temperature bending strain index of
asphalt mixture, the low temperature resistance to
deformation of SBS/SBR co-composited modified
asphalt mixture is the best, the SBS modified asphalt
mixture is the second, and the SBR modified asphalt
mixture is the worst; As for the low temperature
bending stiffness modulus of asphalt mixture, SBR
modified asphalt mixture is the worst; the low
temperature bending stiffness modulus of SBS/SBR
co-composited modified asphalt mixture is the
best.In a word, the low temperature performance of
SBS/SBR co-composited modified asphalt mixture
is optimum. In addition, high grade asphalt is
selected to improve the low temperature
performance of asphalt mixture.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This research was financially supported by the
Excellent Doctoral Dissertation Project of Chang’an
University (No. 310821175012).
REFERENCES
1. Ma, B., Li, J. and Liu, R.W. et al., 2011. Study on
Road Performance of Phase-Change Temperature-
Adjusting Asphalt Mixture. Advanced Materials
Research, 287-290:978-981.
2. Underwood, B. S. and Kim, Y. R., 2013. Effect of
volumetric factors on the mechanical behavior of
asphalt fine aggregate matrix and the relationship to
asphalt mixture properties.Construction & Building
Materials, 49(6):672-681.
3. Sha, A.M. and Tu, S., 2012. Cracks Characteristics
and Damage Mechanism of Asphalt Pavement with
Semi-rigid Base. 7th RILEM International Conference
on Cracking in Pavements.Springer Netherlands,
2012:985-995.
4. Li, Z.L., Gong, N.F. and Luan, X. B, 2008.
Development Mechanism Analysis of Temperature
Shrinkage Type Reflective Crack in Asphalt Pavement
on Semi-rigid Base. Journal of Highway &
Transportation Research & Development,1,25(142).
5. Ma, B., Zhou, X. and Si, W., et al., 2015. Study of the
water stability and high temperature performance of
asphalt mixtures in Qinghai-Tibet cold regions.
Journal of Glaciology & Geocryology, 37(1):175-182.
6. Iliuta, S., Hesp, S. and Marasteanu, M. et al., 2004,
Field Validation Study of Low-Temperature
Performance Grading Tests for Asphalt
Binders.Transportation Research Record Journal of
the Transportation Research Board,1875(1):14-21.
7. Zhao L. H., Xu, G. and Zhao, J., 2011. Research of the
Low Temperature Crack Resistance for the Mineral
Fiber Rein-Forced Asphalt Mixture. Applied
Mechanics & Materials, 97-98(11):172-175.
8. Wang, H., Zhang, C. and Li, L., et al., 2016.
Characterization of Low Temperature Crack
Resistance of Crumb Rubber Modified Asphalt
Mixtures Using Semi-Circular Bending Tests. Journal
of Testing & Evaluation,44(2):20150145.
9. Chazono, H., Oshio, M. and Murai, S., et al., 1989.
Low temperature sintered ceramic capacitor having a
high resistivity and bending strength, and method of
manufacture: US, US4809131.
10. Ho, S.M.S., Zanzotto, L. and Macleod, D., 2002.
Impact of Different Types of Modification on Low-
Temperature Tensile Strength and T critical of Asphalt
Binders. Transportation Research Record Journal of
the Transportation Research Board, 1810(1):1-8.