3.6 Quantitative Analysis
3.6.1 Two Component Fabric of PSA and
P84
Method using dimethylformamide(DMF).Dissolving
the PSA from known weight drying sample by
dimethylformamide, collecting residue, cleaning,
drying and weighing. The PSA mass content in
sample was calculated. The other fiber is P84, which
mass content could also be got.
Method using dimethylsulfoxide(DMSO).
Dissolving the PSA from known weight drying
sample by dimethylsulfoxide, collecting residue,
cleaning, drying and weighing. The PSA mass
content in sample was calculated. The other fiber is
P84, which mass content could also be got.
3.6.2 Two Component Fabric of PSA and
PTFE
Method using DMF and DMSO could also be used.
Dissolving the PSA from known weight drying
sample, collecting residue, cleaning, drying and
weighing. The PSA mass content in sample was
calculated. The other fiber is PTFE, which mass
content could also be got.
Method using 95-98% sulfuric acid Dissolving
the PSA from known weight drying sample by 95-
98% sulfuric acid, collecting residue, cleaning,
drying and weighing. The PSA mass content in
sample was calculated. The other fiber is PTFE,
which mass content could also be got.
3.6.3 Tri-component Fabric of PSA, P84 and
PTFE
When faced with tri-component fabric or needle
punched nonwovens of PSA, P84, we have two
steps. First, dissolving the PSA from known weight
drying sample by DMF, collecting residue, cleaning,
drying and weighing. Second, dissolving the P84
from known weight drying residue by boiling DMF,
recollecting residue, recleaning, redrying and
reweighing.The PSA mass content in sample was
calculated. The other fiber is PTFE, which mass
content could also be got.
Using above methods (3.6.1-3.6.3), the some
samples that known mass fraction were tested by
experimenter A and B. The parallel test results were
showed in table 3.
sam
ple
reagent
Mass
content
Parallel test results
Max
error
experimenter
A
experimenter B
PS
A/
P84
DMF
60.45/
39.55
60.87/
39.13
60.21/
39.79
60.75/
39.25
60.34/
39.66
0.32
DMSO
60.45/
39.55
60.19/
39.81
60.39/
39.61
60.85/
39.15
60.57/
39.43
0.40
PS
A/
PT
FE
DMF
52.88/
47.12
52.97/
47.03
51.51/
48.49
52.99/
47.01
52.78/
47.22
0.37
DMSO
52.88/
47.12
52.65/
47.35
52.99/
47.01
52.53/
47.47
52.71/
47.29
0.35
95-
98%
H2SO4
52.88/
47.12
52.73/
47.27
52.70/
47.30
52.93/
47.07
52.78/
47.22
0.18
PS
A/
P84
/
PT
FE
DMF
30.25/
35.42/
34.33
30.25/
35.42/
34.33
30.25/
35.42/
34.33
30.25/
35.42/
34.33
30.25/
35.42/
34.33
0.89
From table 3, in different experimental
conditions, the stability in chemical reagents of
polysulfonamide fiber and other fibers blended
product is good. The test result error of experimenter
A and B is no more than 1%, which is conform to
meet the requirements of GB/T 2910-2009 testing
standard. While using solvent to dissolve objective
blended products, the stability of the parallel test
performance is good, that was according with the
requirements of quantitative analysis. The
quantitative test results in table 3 showed that the
dissolving methods of polysulfonamide fiber and
other fibers blended products are feasible and valid.
4 CONCLUSIONS
In this paper, the four kinds of testing methods, such
as the burning test, microscopic observation,
chemical dissolution, infrared spectrum and so on,
were used to analyze 3 kinds of fiber (PSA, PI and
PTFE) comprehensively, which were commonly
used in high temperature filter material. A
comprehensive study on the qualitative analysis
methods of three kinds of fiber was carried out that
so as to realize the qualitative identification for three
fibers. On this basis, according to the chemical
dissolution characteristics, establish the quantitative
analysis methods were established. Through the
known mass content blended samples, The test result
error of experimenter A and B is no more than 1%,
which is conform to meet the requirements of testing
standard. The stability of the parallel test
performance is good. The dissolving methods of
PSA, PI and PTFE blended products are
feasible and valid. The testing results are accurate
and reliable.