In the simulation of group particles, Figure 9a
refers to the time-vary situation of the average
velocity of all particles in 0s to 6.5s; Figure 9b refers
to the time-vary situation of the average velocity of
the specific particle labelled No.1. The velocity of
No.1 particle is stable between 3.5s to 5.6s, reached
the peak at 5.6s and then become stable again.
Figure 8: Motion of brown rice showed in streamlines.
a: Time-varying velocity of brown rice particle flow.
b: Time-varying velocity of brown rice particle No.1.
Figure 9: Time-varying velocity of brown rice particle.
Figure 10 indicates the time-vary situation of the
average resultant force of the brown rice particle
flow in the whitening chamber. The pressure
increases as the brown rice particles moving from
the feeding end to the discharging end, but the total
value of the resultant force is not big. That is
because emery roller whitening machine is a speed
type which wipes off the surface of brown rice by
the high speed abrasive action of the emery roller.
Therefore, to a great extent the effectiveness of the
abrasive action is depending on the velocity rather
than the stress of the particles.
Figure 10: Time-varying average resultant force of particle
flow.
4 CONCLUSIONS
In the DEM simulation analysis, a DEM model of
brown rice particle in the shape of oval is built
through the particle bonding method. And the Hertz-
Mindlin no-slip soft sphere model is chosen
according to the contact property between the brown
rice particles, brown rice and screen, brown rice and
whitening roller. After the numerical simulation
analysis, the motion status of the brown rice particle
group in the whiteing chamber (including the
streamlines, and the velocity vector direction) is
generated. It comes to a conclusion that the velocity
of the brown rice particle flow and its individual
particle varies with time; the average resultant force
of the particle flow varies regularly with time.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Foundation Program: National Key Technology
R&D Program for the 13th Five-year Plan (Project
Number: 2017YFD0401101-01).
REFERENCES
1. Jinglan, R., Wenbin, W., 2017. Principles and
Applications of Grain Processing Machine, China
Machine Press. Beijing, 1
st
edition.
2. Jie, M., Wenjun, M., 2014. Analysis of Influencing
Factor on Results of EDEM Simulation. In
Mechanical Engineering & Automation, 2014,(6):49-
51, Vol.187.
3. Favier, J.F., Kremmer, M., 1999. Shape
Representation of Axi-symmetrical, Non-spherical
Particles in Discrete Element Simulation using Multi-
element Model Particles. In Engineering Computation,
International Journal for Computer-aided
Engineering and Software’16: 467-480.
4. Yongjun, H., Shuai, G., Pan, F., Mingjun, D., etc.,
2017. Model Optimization and Particle Migration
Analysis of Cuttings Dryer. In Chinese Journal of
Environmental Engineering, 2017,(10): 5683-5690.
5. Liying, C., Yuepeng, Z., Yubao, Z., Yanyan, Z., 2016.
Influence of Screen Parameters Optimization on
Screening Efficiency of Feed Hammer Mill. In
Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural
Engineering, 2016, 32(22):284-287.
APPENDIX
Author: Weiwei Wu (1986- ), research assistant,
research direction: science & technology research.