4 COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
A variety of fabrics with different densities and
different tissue structures were selected to conduct
the measurement of the warp and weft density, and
compared with the results of manual measurements.
The relative error is defined as
= 100%
cd
c
σ
−
×
(5)
where c is the manual measurement result and d is
the image measurement result. The results are shown
in Table 2.
Table 2: Test results of Fabric density.
It can be seen from the experimental results that
the accuracy of the image method is mainly affected
by tightness of fabric warp and weft arrangement
and the type of tissue structure. The higher the warp
and weft density of the fabric, the smaller the
spacing between the yarns, the more difficult the
edge information between adjacent yarns to extract,
the more obvious the error. In general, the error
between the measurement result of image and the
actual is small.
5 CONCLUSIONS
The wavelet basis is introduced into online yarn
density detection of fabrics. Firstly, the collected
images are preprocessed, and the fabric image is
decomposed and reconstructed by multi-scale
wavelet to obtain the decomposed warp and weft
sub-images. Then the image is binarized and
smoothed to obtain the characteristics of warp and
weft yarns. Finally, the yarn density of warp and
weft is calculated. Experiments have verified the
density of different types of pictures and compared
them with manual measurements. The experimental
results show that the method has small measurement
error and is reliable and practical.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work was supported by the Science and
Technology Planning Project of Guangdong
province, China (2017A090905047); Science and
Technology Planning Project of Guangzhou, China
(201806010128) and A New Generation of
Intelligent Large-Scale Carton Printing Equipment
Package Development and Industrialization. Thanks
for the helps.
REFERENCES
1. Akiyama, R., Iguro, T., et al., 1986. Detection of
weave types in woven fabrics by observing optical
diffraction patterns. Fiber, 42(10), T574-T579.
2. Xu, B., 1996. Identifying fabric structures with fast
fourier transform techniques. Journal of Northwest
Institute of Textileence & Technology, 66(8), 496-
506.
3. Huang, C., Liu, S. C.,et al., 2000. Woven fabric
analysis by image processing: part i: identification of
weave patterns. Textile Research Journal, 70(6), 481-
485.
4. Feng He, Lijian Li, & Jianming Xu., 2007. Fabric
Density Measurement Based on Adaptive Wavelet
Transform. Journal of Textile Research, 28(2), 32-35.
5. Jianqiang Shen, Zhaofeng Ruan, et al., 2007. A
method for fabric tissue and structure parameters
detection based on wavelet transform. Chinese Journal
of Scientific Instrument, 28(2), 357-362.
6. Zhang, R., & Xin, B. 2016. Automatic measurement
method of yarn dyed woven fabric density via wavelet
transform fusion technique. Journal of Fiber
Bioengineering & Informatics, 9(2), 115-132.
7. Ji Shi, Wenyu Tu, et al., 2012. Fabric defect image
preprocessing based on wavelet packet and image
fusion. Silk, 49(8), 30-33.
8. Kaicheng Fu, Zhuxin Zhang, et al. 2016. Detection of
sar image roads based on canny-roa operator and
hough transform. Modern Electronic Technology,
39(23), 1-4.
9. Jun Yang, & Zhongming Zhao. 2007. Multifocus
image fusion method based on curvelet transform.
Optoelectronic Engineering, 34(6), 67-71.
10. Xunming Zhao, Zhongmin Deng, & Youting Qi. 2011.
Automatic detection of warp and weft densities of
woven fabrics based on wavelet transform. Advances
in Textile Science and Technology (5), 45-47.