Beyond 130,this does not apply to required degree of
accuracy, thus dictating the only probe design, which
may then be used, excluding system1 in favor of
system 2, in the temperature region to 200℃.
4.2 Choice of Absorbing Material
Three absorption edge glasses were tested initially
with the ruby sample housed in front of the
LED.Figure4 shows a series of absorption spectra at
room temperature, of the three filters OG515(A),
OG550(B),and RG630(C),with ,for comparison, the
emission profile of the green LED(L).The calibration
graph of the normalized transmission of these three
materials as a function of temperature in the range
20-130
0
C is shown as Figure8.16.Over this range, for
OG515(A),The maximum change in intensity is ±
1.5%,which is due essentially to the error in the ruby
referencing and noise in the system. The result
indicates OG515 is too far removed from the LED
spectrum to make any real impression on the
transmitted intensity. The calibration graph with RG
630(C), shows a slightly nonlinear profile of
normalized transmission with temperature. The
change in the ratio recorded on this graph was 25%
over the temperature range studied. From the LED
profile in Figure4 it can be seen that main absorption
of RG630 is well beyond the peak wavelength of the
LED. Thus, the percentage change in transmitted
intensity in the probe itself can be improved by using
a glass whose characteristic is optimum near the
center wavelength. OG550 (B), with 45%
transmission at 550nm,shows a 45% change in
intensity over the same temperature range. As a result
this type glass was chosen for the sensor system
investigated.
Figure4. Normalized transmission as a function of
temperature of three absorption glasses (20~300C), A, B, C.
4.3 Calibration Graphs
The normalized transmission factor is plotted as a
function of temperature and is Shown in Figure5 (A),
and (B), for a probe-containing ruby and with the
ruby directly in front of the LED.A slightly nonlinear
response results with the experimental points closely
following the smooth response curve. A small
deviation of the system 1 graph (A) occurs as the
normalized transmission decrease due to the small
decrease in the signal/noise ratio. Up to the 130
0
C
limit. For system2, the smooth function continues up
to the maximum temperature of study, 200℃.
Figure 5. Normalized transmission of probe as a
function of temperature.
5 CONCLUSIONS
A considerably improved performance is seen in this
new device over that discussed using infrared
radiation. The slope of the calibration graph from that
work was 1.7×10
-3
K
-1
and thus it can be seen that
the visible radiation-based device is more sensitive,
with a slope,75
0
C of 4.1× 10
-3
K
-1
.The standard
deviation of the typical reading was measured as
0.11
0
C.Hence,the temperature accuracy of this
reading is ±0.6
0
C using the ‘best-fit’ curve drawn
on Figure5.The calibration graph was shown to be
highly reproducible when the probe is temperature
cycled. Drift of the device is low and problems of
LED ageing will not be significant if the diode is not
severely overrun in terms of the applied current. A
change in drive current from 5 to 30mA yields a
spectral shift of the peak emission of only a few
nanometers. As the ruby absorption bands are broad
this will cause only a negligible change in the
fluorescent intensity of emission and the effect on the
determination of the absorption profile of the OG550
glass will also be very small. The drive current to the