purpose will be the development of assets and
culture especially in both Jasem RT. 14 and Sidoarjo.
The local government is expected to protect the
asset, support and promote the entombment of Mbah
Sayid so that it will be widely known by the society.
Similar to how the history of Mbah Sayid was
shaped since 1980, this place has become the
religious tourism destination for the enthusiastic and
attracted visitors. The visitors strongly believed the
influence of Mbah Sayid is greater than any Kiai
(respected spiritual leader or teacher of Islam). For
instance, KH Agus Ali Masyhuri, nicknamed Gus
Ali, who is not a descendant of any Ulama, yet is
successful with his preaching. Then, there is Mr.
Somad, a merchant from Madura, who became
successful after regularly visiting the sacred
entombment of Mbah Sayid, and thus was given the
karomah (blessing).
The namesake Sayid was given in reference to
the exodus of ulama or Moslem scholar in Abbasid
era. However, many people still think subjectively
that a devotional visit to an entombment was a bad
thing. The lack of knowledge and the short-minded
mindset are very regretted by the youth in Sidoarjo.
As a result, the sacred entombment has almost no
visitors at all.
The location of research for developing the
economy based on religious tourism is intentionally
chosen to be near the villagers’ houses, and thus
cutting the costs and time. The given period to finish
the program was only four months. There were
troubles such as the last lecture schedule of TTG
(The Correct Use of Technology), the personal
problems and the difficulty in gaining the villagers’
trust. Thankfully, all the assistance process ended
quite as expected and hopefully the benefits will
return to the villagers of Jasem themselves.
2 LITERATURE REVIEW AND
METHODS
Asset Based Community Development (ABCD) is a
community led approach originally developed by
John McKnight and John Kretzmann, that is built on
four foundational elements (Kretzmann, 2010;
Kretzmann and McKnight, 1993; Mathie and
Cunningham, 2003):
1. It focuses on community assets and strengths
rather than problems and needs (strength based
rather than a deficit approach): Many traditional
approaches to working in communities begin
with a needs analysis or needs mapping, which
focuses on problems in the community, and can
lead to communities being labelled as deficient
and disfunctional. This identity is often absorbed
by people who live there and can result in a
perpetual cycle of disconnection and problems.
The more disfunctional a community is labelled,
the more funds are invested and controlled by
external agencies. Focusing on the strengths and
assets of a community starts with what makes a
community strong, and recognising that everyone
has skills, interests, and experience that can
contribute.
2. It identifies and mobilises individual and
community assets, skills and passions. There are
at least six broad types of assets, which can be
mapped and mobilised in communities,
including: 1. The skills and abilities of
individuals within the community, particularly
people who are passionate about the community
and are good at making connections. 2. Voluntary
community organisations and networks and what
they offer (or could offer) to the community. 3.
Institutions (e.g. non-government organisations,
not for profits, government agencies, businesses)
that are already connected to the community
(particularly small, local institutions); 4. The
physical environment (both natural and built) 5.
The local economy in a broad way that includes
the informal economy (e.g. people swapping
goods and services, voluntary work) as well as
the traditional economy (e.g. production,
consumption). 6. The stories, culture and heritage
of the community.
3. It is community driven – ‘building communities
from the inside out’ (Kretzmann & McKnight,
1993): More and more, asset-based community
development is being termed asset based
community-driven or community-led
development to emphasise the leadership role of
community rather than external agencies.
4. It is relationship driven: The relationships and
social networks that exist within communities are
assets in their own right, but in addition to this,
building relationships between ‘assets’ within the
community is an important part of ABCD and
asset mapping (Mathie & Cunningham, 2003).
Mathie and Cunningham (2002) suggest that
‘ABCD is a practical application of the concept
of social capital’ (p. 9) because of the emphasis it
places on informal networks and by drawing on
their power to mobilise other community assets.
Through building relationships, communities are
able to gain access to resources, networks and
energy that might otherwise remain hidden.