![](bg4.png)
has not been found. This is not in accordance with
the procedures for establishing OHS policies, which
must present the elements of the OHS Committee
(P2K3) in accordance with the Minister of
Manpower Regulation no. Per. 04/MEN/1987. There
should be a discussion on the preparation of OH&S
policy.
2. Criteria 1.2.3
In the document review of the existing job
description, not all heads of work units within the
company are responsible for the performance of
OHS on the work unit. This criteria request that
every position from the highest to the lowest has a
responsibility for OHS performance on the unit it
leads. OHS in the workplace is the responsibility of
all people, so the duties and responsibilities of OHS
in the company must be comprehensive from the
highest position to the lowest (Ramli, 2013).
3. Criteria 1.2.5
In the RDS/PK3/036 Procedure on Emergency
Preparedness and Response, a responsible officer
has been assigned, but the officer has not received
the training and get the certificate. Every officer in
OHS field should have sufficient competence as
evidenced by certificate of competence.
4. Criteria 1.4.5
The government regulation of Occupational Safety
Expert as Secretary of P2K3 has been fulfilled as
intended. However, the relevant OHS Expert has not
reported its activities as regulated in Ministerial
Regulation No. 02/MEN/1992 (Tarigan, 2008).
According to the regulation, OHS Expert should
make a report every 3 months to the Ministry of
Manpower.
5. Criteria 1.4.8
In the field review, no meetings of P2K3 have been
disseminated in the workplace. As per the criteria
1.4.7 of Government Regulation No. 50 of 2012, the
structure of the P2K3 board must documented and
informed to the workforce through the company's
information boards provided in each area work or
other information media.
6. Criteria 2.3.1
In the RDS/PK3/026 Procedure on Access
Procedure, Identification, and Evaluation of
Compliance Regulation, procedures to obtain the
regulation have been established as intended.
However, in document search, no document has
been found. This was regarded as a mismatch
because what should be done according to the
procedure was not executed properly.
7. Criteria 4.1.1
In the Document Search, there are several
procedures written, or the title is not the same as
written in the Document List. This indicates that the
company has not been consistently in accordance
with the procedures they have agreed upon.
Therefore, this company must do re-checking of
each document created.
8. Criteria 5.1.1
Procedure RDS/PK3/014 on Procurement of Urgent
Local Goods has set out the technical specifications,
and the required OH & S requirements are listed at
the time of purchase request. However, from the
observation, the document of purchase as intended
has not been found. In this case, there are
inconsistencies in the implementation of OHS,
which are in the process of purchasing goods.
9. Criteria 5.1.3
The RDS/PK3/014 Procedure on the Procurement of
Local Goods PG Urgent has not set out the
mechanism on the OH & S requirements specified in
the purchase specification to be notified to the
employees who are using it. This criteria stresses
that what is done in criteria 5.1.1 should be informed
to the workforce.
10. Criteria 5.3.1
During the time of document review, it has not been
found the record of goods and services government
regulation by the customer which identified as
potential hazards and assess the risks. As stipulated
in OHSMS, any materials, equipment, or work
performed must be analyzed at risk to ensure OHS at
work.
11. Criteria 6.1.7
The RDS/PK3/032 Procedure on Government
Regulation has not yet set out the proper procedures,
selection, and use of Government Regulation
regarding the standards stated as eligible for use, as
in the Ministerial Regulation No. 08 of 2010 (using
SNI standards) (Ramli, 2013). This procedure needs
to be revised whereby PT X should set firmly in the
form of a document on the standards used in
determining the Personal Protective Equipment
(PPE) used in the workplace.
12. Criteria 6.4.4
At the time of field review, signs were found of
signing for fire extinguisher marking not in
accordance with standard and technical guidelines.
PT X should refer to the standard installation and
maintenance of fire extinguishers as described in
Ministerial Regulation No. 4 of 1980.
13. Criteria 6.5.1
In the document search, the Company does not have
document in the form of checklist/schedule of
maintenance/inspection of each production facilities
used in the workplace. This is an important note to
Evaluation of Implementation of Occupational Health Safety Management System (OHSMS) in PT. X, Magetan, East Java
553