The Perspective of Local Community's on Mangrove Resilience and
Needs Conservation Along the Southern Coast of Lombok Island,
Indonesia
Agil Al Idrus, Abdul Syukur and Lalu Zulkifli
Postgraduate Program and Department of Sciences Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas
Mataram, Jalan Majapahit No 56 Mataram Nusa Tenggra Barat, Indonesia
Keywords: Community’s perspectives, resilience of mangrove, conservation.
Abstract: Mangroves are well known by local communities as plants. They are essential for coastal protection of marine
organisms, habitats, resouches, and their livelihood. This study formulates the value of resilience and
vulnerability of mangrove from the perceptive of local communities as the basis of conservation. The collected
data through from direct observation, questionnaires, interviews and discussions were analyzed using
descriptive statistical analyses. The results showed that the most important value of mangrove resilience is
from the local people perspectives. The development of mangroves are straight forward and could grow on
their own. Mangrove plants can restore environmental conditions for the habitat of marine organism. The
local people can look for organisms that had economic value for a source of livelihood. Therefore, the
consideration of conservation for magrove could become of great benefit for suronding communities on a
grand scale.
1 INTRODUCTION
Resilience has provided a way for thinking about
policies for the future, an important consideration in
a world characterized by unprecedented
environmental change (Chapin et al, 2009). The main
elements of the resilience approach includes
attention to drivers and change processes, treating
social-ecological systems as complex adaptive
systems characterized by cycles and uncertainty, and
social systems and ecosystems as coupled and co-
evolving (Berkes, 2010). The issues of resilience and
vulnerability are likely to become more important in
the framing of resource management questions in the
future. Therefore it is possible to develop strong local
support for sustainable management of mangrove
forests in areas where a positive attitude towards
mangrove conservation prevails (Badola et al., 2012).
In addition, the ecological knowledge’s
understanding has huge potention for local
communities and can be a component in the
protection of coastal ecosystems for the sustainability
of biodiversity (Syukur, 2013). However, the local
community's ecological potential has not been
formulated in conservation formulas, such as
mangrove conservation. The local communities need
the ecological knowledge in order to be able to
identify the needs of mangrove conservation at local
levels. Therefore, the objective of this research is to
see the recovery of mangrove vegetation and biotas in
the ecosystem playing a role as an indicator of
resilience.
2 MATERIALS AND METHODS
The study was conducted from April to October 2017
on the southern coast of East Lombok. The study
conducted and involved the people in Tanjung Luar,
Ketapang Raya and Jerowaru (Figure 1) with
geographic position 116 ° 27'0''- 116 ° 30'0 '' LU and
- 8 ° 48'0 ''-8 ° 51'0). Research sample was determined
proportionally to take into account the length of stay
of minimum 20 residents. They factored in education
level, livelihood and distance of residence in the
mangrove location. In addition, snowball sampling
technique is used to gain depth of information about
the ecological knowledge structure of local
communities (Aswani and Lauer 2006;). The research
data was analyzed by a discrete statistic method that
Al Idrus, A., Syukur, A. and Zulkifli, L.
The Perspective of Local Community’s on Mangrove Resilience and Needs Conservation Along the Southern Coast of Lombok Island, Indonesia.
DOI: 10.5220/0007547805990603
In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference Postgraduate School (ICPS 2018), pages 599-603
ISBN: 978-989-758-348-3
Copyright
c
2018 by SCITEPRESS – Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved
599
to get conceptual pictured about society, ecology,
knowledge, structure, and description in a ecological
perspective (Few 2009).
Figure 1. Research location
3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
3.1 Diversity of Mangrove Species and
Diversity of Fauna Species
The vegetation of mangrove in the study area
represents the potential of mangroves on the southern
coast on Lombok Island (Table 1). The mangrove
species found on all the location are Avicennia
marina, Rhizophora stylosa, Sonneratia alba and
Xylocarpus moluccenis. In addition, the species of
mangrove found in two locations are Avicennia
lanata dan Bruguiera cylendrica. The different
number of mangrove species on each sampling area
may reflect environmental conditions. Furthermore,
the dominant mangrove species found in Tanjung
Luar is Rhizophora stylosa, Avicennia lanata in
Kedome, Avicennia marina and Sonneratia alba in
Lungkak, Sonneratia alba in Teluk Jor and also
Sonneratia alba in Teluk Ekas. The mangrove species
are lower, compared to other locations such as in Gili
Sulat where the number of species totaled eleven
(Agil et al., 2015).
Table 1. The diversity of mangrove species in the study
area.
Species Tan
jung
Luar
Kedo
me
Lung
kak
Poton
Bakau
Teluk
Jor
Teluk
Ekas
A
vicennia
marina
A
vicennia
lanata
B
ruguiera
c
y
lendrica
Ceriops
decandra
L
umnitzera
rasemosa
R
hizophora
a
iculata
R
hizophora
mucronata
R
hizophora
s
t
y
losa
Sonneratia
alba
X
ylocarpus
moluccenis
Total
N
umber
of S
p
ecies
4
6 7 6 9
5
The mangrove species in each sampling area have
ecologically contributed to the sustainability of the
biota diversity. In this study, we found a diversity of
animals associated with mangroves (Table 2). The
types of animals associated with mangroves are a
form of mangrove ecological services. The diversity
of fauna species that can be found within the areas
such as crustacean, insects, fish, vertebrates (Varanus
sp, Chrysopelea sp, Cerberus sp.), mamalia
((Lutrogale sp danCallosciurus sp.), primate groups
and birds (Agil et al., 2015), mangrove can be
referred to the home for biodiversity (Ellison, 2008;
Nagelkerken et al., 2008;). Furthermore, the
environmental services from mangrove plays a role in
the regulation of gas for the balance of CO
2
and O
2
in
the atmosphere. As well as climate regulation, genetic
resources, regulator of species and biophysical
dynamics and increase biodiversity value (Larkum et
al., 2006).
Table 2. The diversity of fauna in the study area.
Class Species Location
Tan
jung
Luar
Ke
do
me
Lung
kak
Po
ton
Ba
kau
Te
luk
Jor
Teluk
Ekas
Gas
tro
poda
Cerithidea
cin
ulata + + + + + +
Cerithidea
q
uadrata + + + + + +
Chicoreus
ca
p
ucinus - - - + - -
Chicoreus sp. + + + + + +
L
itoria
s
cabra + + + + + +
L
ittoraria
melanosto + + + + + +
ICPS 2018 - 2nd International Conference Postgraduate School
600
ma
M
urex s
p
. - -- + --
N
erita
undata + + + + + +
Oliva sp. - -- + --
P
omacea
canalicula
ta + + + + + +
Strombus sp. + + + - - -
Sulcospira
sp. + + + + + +
Telescopi
um
telescopium - - + - - -
Terebralia
s
ulcata
+
+
+
+
+
+
Volema
myristica
-
-
-
+
+
+
Crust
a
cea
Uca s
p
. + + + + + +
Scylla
s
errata + + + + + +
Rep
ti
lia
Varanus
s
alvato
r
- + - - - -
Cryptophis
boschmai
-
+
-
-
-
-
3.2 Assessment of Local Communities
on the Ecological Function of
Mangrove
The diversity of mangrove services in the perspective
of local communities is the value of environmental
services obtained from the presence of mangroves.
The communities interviewed as respondents can
distinguish between species of mangroves based on
morphological characteristics, such as; life spots and
fruit types Furthermore, they stated that mangrove
are important for many habitats, such as; fish
holothuroidea, mollusca, birds and reptile. The local
knowledge of mangroves represents its ability to
describe it is many services ((Table 3).
Distribution of scores on the results of
respondents assessment (Table 3), it shows that the
number of respondents who choose the benefits from
the mangrove in the category are useful and very
useful, was prominent.
Table 3. The distribution of respondents based on the results
of an assessment of the ecological role and benefits of
mangroves for the community's, n= 100.
Description Results of respondents'
assessment
no
ben
fit
les
s
qui
te
Bene
fit
very
bene
fit
Habitat and fish
feedin
g
g
roun
d
0 12 15 30 40
The small fish habitat 0 3 13 31 45
Habitat of marine life
other fish
0 0 14 44 42
The sources of marine
fertility
0 0 15 20 65
Provisioning services
material out
p
uts
Foods 80 20 0 0 0
Wood 0 0 5 10 85
Cegulating and
maintenance
Purification of wate
r
0 0 20 25 55
Flood control 0 0 15 20 65
Regulation of the
climate via carbon
sequestration
0 5 25 35 30
River flow 0 0 10 20 70
Cultural services
(non-material)
Cognitive
development
0 15 15 25 45
Recreation 0 0 5 10 85
Aesthetic experiences 0 0 10 20 70
3.3 The Perspective of Local
Community’s on the Resilience of
Mangrove
Resilience is a parameter for assessing ecosystem
changes to recover after receiving a disturbance.
Resilience is the observation of a disturbance to the
system that can absorb and retain the same function,
structure, and identity and it is the ability to self
organize as well as its capacity in adapting toward
environmental change and social-ecological systems
as complex adaptive systems (Walker et al. 2008;
Chapin et al, 2009; Berkes, 2010). Moreover,
resilience is a property of a system, and in Social-
Ecological Systems (SES), humans have the added
capacity to anticipate change to some degree and
influence future paths.
The local communities in the study area have
adequate knowledge of mangrove services (Table 3).
In this case, they can identify changes in mangrove
conditions as an object of assessment of the mangrove
resilience and associated biota. However, resilient
objects are extensive and complex in mangrove
ecosystems, so this study used mangrove resilience
indicators of cover value and mangrove density, using
example such as species of biota ;fish, shrimp, crab
and molluscs. The assessment of mangrove
resilience, respondents were given choice in several
The Perspective of Local Community’s on Mangrove Resilience and Needs Conservation Along the Southern Coast of Lombok Island,
Indonesia
601
categories namely (e.g., mangrove category has
recovered between 75% - 100%, the mangrove
category has recovered between 50% - 75%% and the
mangrove category has recovered <50%. Here is the
results of respondents' assessment of mangrove
resilience in the study area (Figure 2).
Figure 2. Respondent's assessment of mangrove resilience,
n = 100.
The results of the respondents' assessment
presented in Figure 2, are the mangrove condition has
not recovered to 50% which is quite limited compared
with those who have recovered above 50% -100%.
However, the condition of biota (e.g., fish, shrimp,
crabs and mollusks), more than 50% of respondents
said, has not recovered to 50%. It explains the reason
of mangrove has a faster recoverey compared to the
biota associated with the location, or biota of
economic value in the location. Those who are
exploited have a slower recovery.. Nevertheless, the
findings of this study were indicators of mangrove
resilience from a community perspective in
accordance with the concept of ecological resilience.
The respondents are able to identify mangrove
resilience and formulate conservation efforts for its
preservation. This in turn generates their social
awareness and views regarding management options.
It can be stated that they desire the mangrove area to
be protected, especially from the effort to change the
mangrove land into pond land, salt fields and new
settlement. Furthermore, they are also expected the
mangroves used in an environmentally friendly
manner through the development of eco-friendly
cultivation and tourism.
4 CONCLUSION
The local people's perspectives on the mangroves
resilience are significant. The knowledge of local
people on mangrove enviromental service is
extremely relevant in the effort to maintain a balance
ecosystem. The local people’s knowledge about the
natural system is a great value to scientific research
and understanding leading to better conservation
efforts by all who are involved.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The authors are thankful to the Directorate General of
Strengthening Research and Development,
Directorate of Research and Community Service,
Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher
Education of Indonesia for providing the funding
for carrying out this study. The authors would also
like to thank Dr. Alifman Hakim, a scientist from the
University of Mataram Indonesia, for his constructive
criticism and comments during the preparation of this
article.
REFERENCES
Agil Al-I, Hadiprayitno G, Hamdi L dan Mertha IG.
2015. Potensi Vegetasi dan Arthropoda
diKawasan Mangrove Gili Sulat Lombok
Timur. Biologi Tropis, 15 (2): 62-70.
Aswani S, Lauer M. 2006. Incorporating fishers’
local knowledge and behavior into
geographical information systems (GIS) for
designing marine protected areas in Oceania.
Human Organization,. 65:80–101.
Badola, R., Barthwal, S., and Hussain, S.A.2012.
Attitudes of local communities towards
conservation of mangrove forests: A case
study from the east coast of India. Estuarine,
Coastal and Shelf Science, 96: 188-196
Berkers, F. 2010. Shifting perspectives on resource
management: Resilience and the
Reconceptualization of ‘Natural Resources’
and ‘Management. MAST. 9(1): 13-40.
Chapin, F.S., Kofinas G.P. and Folke, C. 2009
Principles of Ecosystem Stewardship:
Resilience-based Resource Management in
a Changing World. New York: Springer-
Verlag
0
20
40
60
Cover Density Biota
34
44
13
59
48
30
7
8
57
% Total responden
ICPS 2018 - 2nd International Conference Postgraduate School
602
Ellison A M. 2008. Mangrove ecology – applications
in forestry and costal zone management.
Aquatic Botany, (89): 77.
Few R. 2009. Conservation, participation, and
power: protected-area planning in the
coastal zone of belize. Journal of Planning
Education and Research,. 19: 410 – 408.
Larkum AWD. Robert JO dan Carlos M. Duarte.
2006. Seagrasses : Biology, Ecology and
Conservation. Springer. Netherlands
Nagelkerken, I., Blaber, S.J.M., Bouillon, S., Green,
P., Haywood, M., Kirton, L.G., Meynecke,
J.-O., Pawlik, J., Penrose, H.M., Sasekumar,
A., Somerfield, P.J., 2008. The habitat
function of mangroves for terrestrial and
marine fauna: A review. Aquatic. Botany.
89: 155–18.
Syukur, A. 2013. Pengetahuan Ekologi Masyarakat
Lokal sebagai Indikator Penilaian Potensi
Lamun (Seagrass) di Tanjung Luar Lombok
Timur. Jurnal Biologi Tropis, 13 ( 2): 209-
217
Walters, B.B., Ronnback, P., Kovacs, J.M., Crona,
B., Hussain, S.A., Badola, R., Primavera, I.H.,
Barbier, E., and Dahdouh-Guebas, F. 2008.
Ethnobiology, socio-economics and
management of mangrove forests: A review.
Aquatic Botany, 89: 220–236
The Perspective of Local Community’s on Mangrove Resilience and Needs Conservation Along the Southern Coast of Lombok Island,
Indonesia
603