categories namely (e.g., mangrove category has
recovered between 75% - 100%, the mangrove
category has recovered between 50% - 75%% and the
mangrove category has recovered <50%. Here is the
results of respondents' assessment of mangrove
resilience in the study area (Figure 2).
Figure 2. Respondent's assessment of mangrove resilience,
n = 100.
The results of the respondents' assessment
presented in Figure 2, are the mangrove condition has
not recovered to 50% which is quite limited compared
with those who have recovered above 50% -100%.
However, the condition of biota (e.g., fish, shrimp,
crabs and mollusks), more than 50% of respondents
said, has not recovered to 50%. It explains the reason
of mangrove has a faster recoverey compared to the
biota associated with the location, or biota of
economic value in the location. Those who are
exploited have a slower recovery.. Nevertheless, the
findings of this study were indicators of mangrove
resilience from a community perspective in
accordance with the concept of ecological resilience.
The respondents are able to identify mangrove
resilience and formulate conservation efforts for its
preservation. This in turn generates their social
awareness and views regarding management options.
It can be stated that they desire the mangrove area to
be protected, especially from the effort to change the
mangrove land into pond land, salt fields and new
settlement. Furthermore, they are also expected the
mangroves used in an environmentally friendly
manner through the development of eco-friendly
cultivation and tourism.
4 CONCLUSION
The local people's perspectives on the mangroves
resilience are significant. The knowledge of local
people on mangrove enviromental service is
extremely relevant in the effort to maintain a balance
ecosystem. The local people’s knowledge about the
natural system is a great value to scientific research
and understanding leading to better conservation
efforts by all who are involved.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The authors are thankful to the Directorate General of
Strengthening Research and Development,
Directorate of Research and Community Service,
Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher
Education of Indonesia for providing the funding
for carrying out this study. The authors would also
like to thank Dr. Alifman Hakim, a scientist from the
University of Mataram Indonesia, for his constructive
criticism and comments during the preparation of this
article.
REFERENCES
Agil Al-I, Hadiprayitno G, Hamdi L dan Mertha IG.
2015. Potensi Vegetasi dan Arthropoda
diKawasan Mangrove Gili Sulat Lombok
Timur. Biologi Tropis, 15 (2): 62-70.
Aswani S, Lauer M. 2006. Incorporating fishers’
local knowledge and behavior into
geographical information systems (GIS) for
designing marine protected areas in Oceania.
Human Organization,. 65:80–101.
Badola, R., Barthwal, S., and Hussain, S.A.2012.
Attitudes of local communities towards
conservation of mangrove forests: A case
study from the east coast of India. Estuarine,
Coastal and Shelf Science, 96: 188-196
Berkers, F. 2010. Shifting perspectives on resource
management: Resilience and the
Reconceptualization of ‘Natural Resources’
and ‘Management. MAST. 9(1): 13-40.
Chapin, F.S., Kofinas G.P. and Folke, C. 2009
Principles of Ecosystem Stewardship:
Resilience-based Resource Management in
a Changing World. New York: Springer-
Verlag
0
20
40
60
Cover Density Biota
34
44
13
59
48
30
7
8
57
% Total responden