value in this research is equal to 2,313 with level of
significance equal to 0.023 bigger than t table equal
to 1.98552. This indicates that the rejection of H0
and the acceptance of Ha which means there is a
significant influence organizational citizenship
behavior (X3) variable to organizational
commitment variable (Y) of 23.2% so the effect is
small because the determinant coefficient below
50%. And from the results of multiple linear
regression shows the value of coefficient of 0.187
states that the addition of organizational citizenship
behavior of 1 will increase the organizational
commitment of 0.187.
This is in line with Bogy Juniar Gintang
Kumara's (2014) research, there is a very significant
positive relationship between organizational
commitment and the level of organizational
citizenship behavior in Ratu Luwes Pasar Legi
employees. towards organizational citizenship
behavior of 89.3%. Which explains more than the
average employee who has an OCB to work for the
company where he works, overall the employees
have a high commitment to the organization.
Of all the independent variables, the most
significant influence is the quality of work life (X2)
with the highest t count of 4.357 with the significant
level of 0.000 and has the largest partial coefficient
of determination that is equal to 0.411 or 41.1% and
the smallest significance of other variables. From the
results of multiple linear regression shows the value
of large coefficient the most among other variables
that is equal to 0.451. The result of the research
shows that quality of work life (X2) have the most
significant effect to organizational commitment (Y).
This shows how important the quality of work life.
CONCLUSIONS
Based on the results of research that has been done
about "The influence of job motivation,
organizational citizenship behavior and quality of
work life toward organizational commitment (Study
At PT. XXX Jaya Farm Hatchery Pasuruan" it can
be concluded as follows:
Job Motivation (X1), quality work of life (X2)
and organizational citizenship behavior (X3)
together or simultaneously affect organizational
commitment (Y). Independent variables have
influence together proved by result of F test which
have simultaneous influence of independent variable
to dependent variable. Thus the first hypothesis in
this study has been proven and acceptable which
means Ha accepted, H0 rejected.
Job motivation (X1) partially significant effect
on namely quality work of life (X2) and
organizational citizenship behavior (X3). Thus the
third hypothesis has been proven and acceptable.
(Y), organizational citizenship behavior (X3)
partially significant influence on organizational
commitment (Y), quality of work life (X2) partially
or each has a significant effect on organizational
commitment (Y). It is proven based on t test where t
count value of each variable is bigger than t table.
Thus the second hypothesis in this study has been
proven and acceptable.
The variable that has the most significant
influence on organizational commitment (Y) is the
quality of work life (X2) variable because it has the
highest t count. And has the smallest significance
among other variables.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The researchers would like to express their gratitude
to God and to thank the parties involved in this
research. Million thanks go to my beloved family
who always support and encouraged my spirit, the
lecturers of Airlangga University, the employees in
this research who became the respondents, and my
colleagues who helped in funding this research.
REFERENCES
Allen, N. J., Meyer, J., 2013. P. Commitment In The
Workplace: Theory, Research, and Application. Sage
Publishing, Inc. Thousand Oaks, CA, (Ed. Rev).
Arikunto., 2006. A Research Procedure For a Practical
Approach. Rineka Cipta. Jakarta.
Cascio, W., 2010. Managing Human Resources,
Productivity, Quality of Work Life, Profits. The Mac
Graw Hill Company. America, Ninth Edition.
Chen, I. J., & Paulraj., 2016. A. Towards of Theory Human
Resource Management: The Construct and
Measurement. Journal of Human Resource
Management, Vol. 22, pp. 139-150.
Ghozali, I., 2012. Statistic Test. UNDIP Press. Semarang.
Hezberg, F., 2012. One More Time: How Do You Motivate
Employees?. Harvard Business Press. Boston,.
Husnawati, A., 2015. Analysis of The Effect of Quality of
Work Life on Employee Performance With
Commitment and Job Satisfaction as Variable
Intervening (Study on Perum Pemuwai Regional
Office VI Semarang). Eprints.undip.ac.id. Semarang.
Husna,. Basuki, H., 2016. Influence Analysis of Auditor
Personal Characteristics To Auditorโs Acceptance of
Dysfunctional Audit Behavior (Empirical Study at
ICPS 2018 - 2nd International Conference Postgraduate School
772