Effects of Different Materials on Indoor Thermal
Environment in Guangxi Miao Village
Y Liu*, Y Liu, C X Xue, L Y Lu and M Wang
Sustainable Building and Environmental Research Institute, NPU, Dongxiang Road,
Chang'an District, Xi'an Shaanxi, 710129, P.R.China
Corresponding author and e-mail: Y Liu, solarlily7@qq.com
Abstract. With the development of the social economy, the reinforced concrete residences in
the Miao village in Guangxi were gradually appearing, which shows a threat to the traditional
wooden residence to some extent. Which one was more suitable for the local environment?
This paper investigated three representative residences in the Jiangzhu village, Liuzhou city,
Guangxi province of China. Residence No.1 belongs to an old carpenter's family was built
with traditional building materials (wood) fifty years ago. Residence No.2 was also a wooden
house with a history of over one hundred years. Residence No.3 was a recently built residence
with modern materials (brick and reinforced concrete). The temperature and humidity of these
three houses were measured respectively, and the results show that, in Guangxi Miao village,
the traditional building materials and constructions were superior to that of modern building
in terms of their indoor thermal performance.
1. Background
Thermal environment is closely related to the health and comfort of human. People have been trying
to improve the living environment by developing new technologies. However, through historical
screening, the traditional folk houses created by the ancestors uses various simple constructions and
local materials to cope with the regional climate and environment in different places. [1] This paper
compares and analyzes the indoor thermal performance of traditional residences and modern
residences in a Guangxi Miao village in China.
Located in the southwestern part of the hot-summer and cold-winter zone, the county is located in
the mid subtropical monsoon climate. Surrounded by mountains, the climate obviously turns like
mountain climate. In Rongshui, the weather is greatly influenced by monsoon and the heat and
humidity are intense. However, the climate is quite mild. The extreme maximum temperature was
38 °C in 2017. The annual extreme minimum temperature in the county was 3°C. The lowest
temperature in the cold mountain area was -4.1°C. The rainfall is abundant but not evenly distributed.
The four seasons are uneven. Summer is the longest, then winter and the shortest season is spring.
The annual total evaporation was 1478.2 millimeters. [2]
Rongshui always has the reputation of "the kingdom of China fir ", which means it is rich in the
resources of China fir. Besides, China fir has good quality and toughness which is suitable to be used
as building materials. Therefore, the traditional building and furniture in this area mostly use China
fir as raw materials forming a very local style stilt house (Figure 1). The advantage of the stilt house
240
Liu, Y., Liu, Y., Xue, C., Lu, L. and Wang, M.
Effects of Different Materials on Indoor Thermal Environment in Guangxi Miao Village.
In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Environmental Management, Science and Engineering (IWEMSE 2018), pages 240-247
ISBN: 978-989-758-344-5
Copyright © 2018 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved
is that it can be built without land formation. The house can be built after a fire on the burnt place.
Besides, it can play a good role in moisture-proof, ventilation and cooling. [3]. However, with the
development of the social economy the construction of new rural residence, reinforced concrete,
shows a great influence on the traditional residences built with wood and other traditional building
materials. The modern residences were generally 3-4 floors, with flat roof, and the bottom was
selectively elevated (Figure 2).
Figure 2. Modern residence (Masonry house).
Figure 2. Modern residence (Masonry
house).
2. Field investigation
2.1. Purpose of the investigation
In order to analyze the thermal environment of Miao village in Guangxi, there were three
representative houses in the Jiangzhu village of Rong Shui county selected as test subjects.
Residence No.1 was an old carpenter's house, which was built fifty years ago. The building
locates on the south slope of a hill. The main entrance and living room faced north, and its main
material was wood. Its first floor was used to raise livestock. The second floor was used for daily life
with Huotang (means fire pond, a special space in the local traditional architecture, surrounded with
family member and providing heat both for cooking and air). There was an attic used as storeroom.
Residence No.2 was a 100-year-old local residence. Located within a group of buildings, it was
built on the mountain and faced south. Its first floor was used for storing and raising livestock. The
second floor was used for daily life with better lighting.
Residence No.3 was a house with modern materials. Its first floor was partly built on a stream,
partly used for storage and the second floor was used for daily life. It has terraces on the top floor and
its roofs were flat.
The temperature and humidity of the three houses were measured respectively. They were less
than 300m apart. So, they had the similar outdoor environmental and climatic impacts.
2.2. Instruments and measurement methods
2.2.1. Layout of the measurement instruments. A total of 6 temperature and humidity self-recording
instrument were used to measure the temperature and humidity of the three houses. Positions of the
instruments ( to ) were shown in Figure 3-5.
Residence No.1: was set in the guest hall, half opened to outside space, without direct sunlight.
So, it represents outdoor environment. was set in the bedroom, representing the traditional house
indoor environment.
Effects of Different Materials on Indoor Thermal Environment in Guangxi Miao Village
241
Residence No.2: was set in the bedroom, representing the indoor data of traditional buildings.
was set in the living room.
Residence No.3: was set in the bedroom, representing the indoor environment of modern house.
Figure 3. Positions of the instruments in
Residence No.1.
Figure 4. Positions of the instruments in
Residence No.2.
Figure 5. Positions of the instruments in Residence
No.3.
Figure 6. Daily average temperature
frequency.
2.2.2. Method of Measurement. Temperature and humidity self-recording instrument were set to
collect temperature, humidity data every 10min. It continuously recorded for 64 days. All the
collected data was read into the computer.
3. Data analysis
3.1. Data processing
3.1.1. Temperature. In order to simplify the large amount of data, the common average temperature
was selected from typical days to represent summer time. The specific process was:
I. Calculate the daily average temperature. II. Determine the frequency of different temperatures.
It was found that the occurrence frequency of 26-27°C was the highest (Figure 6). So 26-27°C was
selected as the typical day, 25 and 28°C as the floating range. III. The corresponding time range was
IWEMSE 2018 - International Workshop on Environmental Management, Science and Engineering
242
2017.8.30 00:00AM-2017.9.5 11:30PM. IV. Calculate the average temperature every 30 min. V.
Convert the data into line chart.
The analysis results were expected to reveal the differences of indoor thermal environment
between the modern and traditional houses.
3.1.2. Humidity. Because of the abundant rainfall in summer, the data shows a great turtbulence by
rainfall. [4] So weather was considered as the mainly influence factor of indoor humidity. Sunny
weather and rainy weather were the most common weather in the researched area. Data between
2017.8.30 00:00AM-2017.9.1 11:30PM were selected to represent the change of humidity indoor and
outdoor in the sunny days, and data between 2017.8.9 00:00AM-2017.8.11 12:00PM were selected to
represent the changes of humidity in the rain days.
3.2. Temperature analysis
3.2.1. Comparison of residence No.1 and No.3. This part was going to analyse the influence of
different structures and materials on indoor temperature under the same orientation and the same
climate.
According to Figure7, the mean outdoor temperature among the selected period was 27°C , and the
maximum temperature was generally between 16:30-17:30. The selected time period was sunny, and
the temperature fluctuates within the range of 22.7-31.4 C. The mean indoor temperature of the
traditional residence (Residence No.1) was 27.8°C , the daily maximum temperature was floating at
28.5 -30.5°C , the minimum was about 24.2°C -26.9°C , and the amplitude of temperature fluctuation
was about 3.5°C , which was lower than that of outdoor. The average indoor temperature of the
modern house (Residence No.3) was 31.1°C , the daily maximum temperature was floating at 30.5 -
36.4°C , the minimum was about 26.3°C -29.9°C , the temperature fluctuation was about 5.5°C , and
the overall level was higher than that of the outdoor.
According to Figure 7, the heating time of Residence No.1 was about 11 hours, and the cooling
time was about 13 hours. The temperature of Residence No.3 was about 11.5 hours, and the cooling
time was about 12.5 hours. Both of their time were similar. Therefore, it was not the length of heating
time but the amount of radiant heat that rise the temperature.
Figure 7. Temperature comparison between Residence No.1 and Residence No.3.
According to Figure7, the daytime heat absorption of traditional dwellings was approximately
equal to the night heat release. Although both of No.1 and No.3’s heat exotherms during night were
almost equal, the heat accumulation in the day of modern dwellings was greater than that at night,
resulting in the accumulation of heat and the increase of temperature. The slope of both warming and
cooling part can be found to be almost the same as that of heat release. But during the heat
accumulation the slope of the traditional house had an obvious change. In each cycle, the heating rate
Effects of Different Materials on Indoor Thermal Environment in Guangxi Miao Village
243
of traditional buildings before 10:30 was faster, while slower after 10:30. With the increase of
outdoor temperature, the heat transfer rate of the envelope decreased obviously, the rate of indoor
temperature increased slowly, and the total amount of heat was less than the modern residence. This
shows that compared with modern houses, the envelope of traditional buildings had better thermal
performance, and to a certain extent reduced the heat transfer from outdoor to indoor.
In addition, the highest outdoor temperature was around 17:00 and the highest indoor temperature
was around 19:00, delay 2 hours. However, the minimum temperature in and outside the room was
similar. From the same time at night, the traditional building showed a more comfortable temperature,
about 25.5°C , 5°C lower than modern buildings.
3.2.2. Comparison between residence No.1, residence No.2 and residence No.3. The following
discussions were conducted to compare the impact of building structure, material selection and
building orientation on indoor temperature.
After comparing the outdoor temperature of Residence No.2 and No.3 (Figure 8), it was found
that both of them were almost identical. Because the living room of the traditional house in this area
was half opened to outdoor space, so the temperature was similar to that of the outdoor air. That is to
say, the main factor affecting the temperature of living room was outdoor air, and the influence of
building orientation on the temperature of living room was very small.
After excluding the influence of orientation, the following part will compare the indoor
temperature of Residence No.1, Residence No.2 and Residence No.3 (Figure 9). Except for a slight
difference in the fluctuation range, the traditional residence (Residence No.1 & No.2) was basically
similar in terms of cycle and mean value, keeping at around 26-27°C . The temperature of modern
houses (Residence No.3) was higher than that of traditional houses (Residence No.1 & No.2) at the
same time, which was 6-7°C higher than that of traditional buildings.
Figure 8. Outdoor temperature comparison
(No.1 & No.2).
Figure 9. Temperature comparison (No.1&
No.2 & No.3).
3.3. Humidity analysis
3.3.1. Comparison between residence No.1 and residence No.3. According to Figure10, the average
humidity was 77.5% during the continuous sunny days in summer, and the highest was around
9:00AM. It fluctuated periodically in the range of 60.5%-89%. Average indoor humidity of the
IWEMSE 2018 - International Workshop on Environmental Management, Science and Engineering
244
traditional residence was 80.6%, the daily maximum humidity was about 85%, which was slightly
lower than outdoor. And the lowest was about 77%, which was obviously higher than the outdoor.
Besides, the moisture fluctuation amplitude was about 5 percentage points, which was less than that
of the outdoor. It can be seen that the envelope of traditional houses had strong hygroscopicity and
kept indoor humidity at a high level.
The indoor average humidity of the modern house was 60.8%, the daily maximum humidity was
about 68%, which was obviously lower than outdoor and the lowest was about 55%. And the
humidity fluctuation was about 12 percentage points, which was less than the outdoor corresponding
data. Therefore, the envelope of modern residential buildings had better moisture resistance and can
kept indoor humidity at a low level.
According to the annual development report of China building energy conservation [5], indoor
comfort relative humidity range from 30% to 70%. Modern houses can basically reach a relatively
comfortable humidity environment, but traditional houses were much higher than this standard.
In the continuous rainy days, Residence No.1 and Residence No.3 basically kept the same, at
around 80%, and slightly lower than outdoor humidity.
Figure 10. Humidity comparison (No.1&
No.2 /Sunny).
Figure 12. Outside humidity (No.1& No.3
/Sunny).
3.3.2. Comparison between residence No.1 and residence No.2. The following discussions were
conducted to compare the impact of structures, materials selection and orientation on indoor
temperature.
Effects of Different Materials on Indoor Thermal Environment in Guangxi Miao Village
245
After comparing the outdoor humidity of No.1 and No.2 (Figure 12), it was found that No.1 was
slightly lower than that of No.2 at night, and it was similar in the daytime. Because No.1 was a single
building, the surrounding area was mainly field, and the air was easy to spread; and No.2 was in a
group of building. So, the air was difficult to spread, which result in a circumstance that the humidity
changes slowly.
Compare indoor humidity of No.1, No.2 and No.3 (Figure 13). Except for a slight difference in
the fluctuation range, the traditional houses (Residence No.1 and No.2) were basically similar in
terms of periodicity and average value remaining at around 83%. The humidity of modern houses
(Residence No.3) was lower than that of traditional houses (No.1 & No.2) keeping about 60%.
4. Conclusions
By testing the indoor thermal environment of traditional houses and modern houses in Miao village,
Guangxi in summer, the following conclusions can be drawn:
The envelope of traditional buildings had obvious advantages in controlling indoor
temperature. It was mainly due to the traditional material, wood, whose maximum amount of
heat absorbing capacity was lower than the concrete. Besides, the tightness of the wood
envelope was poor, so the heat can be quickly taken away through air infiltration to maintain
a cooler indoor environment.
During the continuous fine weather, modern houses had better effect on indoor humidity and
it can be basically maintain below 70%. While the traditional house was higher than 75%. In
the following designs the moisture proof performance of the envelope needs to be improved.
There were both advantages and disadvantages in temperature and humidity control. But
under the circumstances of non-air-conditioned environment, ASHRAE55-2010 clearly
pointed out that there was no humidity limit [6] when the temperature was among the given
range.
In general, the traditional houses are more suitable for the local environment and are more
comfortable in summer, especially at night.
Acknowledgement
The authors of this paper very much appreciate the local residents who have provided the
convenience and great assistant for the field investigation.
The research of this paper was supported by the National 13th-Five-Year Key Research and
Development Project of China(2016YFC0700200) and the 12th-five-year” science and technology
support project (2015BAL03B04) and the national college students’ creation training project of
Northwestern Polytechnical University (201710699119) .
References
[1] Zhao Q 2005 Experience and model language of ecological architecture in traditional
dwellings D. Xi'an University Of Architecture And Technology
[2] 2005 Meteorological information center of China Meteorological Administration, Department
of architectural technology and science, Tsinghua University. Special meteorological data
set for building thermal environment analysis in China Z.
[3] Ceng Z H 2010 Ventilation method of traditional residence in Guangzhou government and its
application in modern architecture D. South China University of Technology
[4] Tan M L and Luo H L 2014 Analysis of the climatic characteristics of precipitation in
run Shui county in recent 55 years in Guangxi J. meteorological research and
application 35 (3): 27-30
[5] 2011 Tsinghua University building energy efficiency research center Annual report on
China's building energy efficiency M. Beijing: China Construction Industry Press
IWEMSE 2018 - International Workshop on Environmental Management, Science and Engineering
246
[6] 2011 ASHRAE, ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 55-2010 Thermal Environment Conditions
for Human Occupancy [S]. Atlanta, GA, American Society of Heating, Ventilating
and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc.
Effects of Different Materials on Indoor Thermal Environment in Guangxi Miao Village
247