lesion in female students were not as severe as in male
students.
Diagnostic study commonly evaluated by their
sensitivity and specificity. Estimation of the basic
value of a screening study is that it’s sensitivity must
be at least 50 % if there is no hypothesis before to
show that the probability or chance for an instrument
to detect a true-positive is in balance with at least 50
%.
8
On the other hand, minimum value of sensitivity
if there is any hypothesis before will be expected to
be higher at least 70 % (Choplin andLundy, 2001;
Arroll, Khin, and Kerse, 2003; Bujang and Adnan,
2016). In this study, five out of six trained NMP have
sensitivity above 60 %, more than the basis estimation
of a screening study.
PPV is the probability that a subject with
abnormal or positive test actually has the disease,
meanwhile NPV is the probability that the subject has
no disease given a negative test result. PPV or NPV
are the key characteristics of a screening program. It
is important to remember that the PPV or NPV are
dependent on both the population under study and the
technical characteristics of the screening test
(Goetzinger and Odibo, 2016). A screening test with
relatively high sensitivity and specificity may still
have a low PPV if the population prevalence is
sufficiently low. Thus, to assess a proposed screening
test it is necessary to evaluate both the technical and
population characteristics (Maxim, Niebo, and Utell,
2014). All the result of this study showed higher PPV
than NPV. With this high PPV, we could apply this
screening method to other communities with a high
probability of scabies prevalence, so it might be able
to identify the possibility of true-positive scabies
well.
There is difficulty in establish scabies diagnosis
due to the lack of gold standard examination. Using
the current reference standard (scraping or biopsy),
there are problems associated with excluding case
with negative skin scrapping results because this
technique is far from being 100 % accurate. It also
happened with dermoscopy, showed the limitation
that is excluding false negative because there is no
reference standard for ruling out or verifying the
absence of scabies infection. A systematic review on
scabies diagnostic methods showed that the diagnosis
of scabies infection is often imprecise or speculative.
None of the reviewed studies met the criteria for high
quality evidence based on established methodology
filters (Leung and Miller, 2011).
Comparison for the examination result from NMP
using dermatovenereologist clinical and knowledge
judgement as gold standard in line with a statement
from Leung that clinical experience and judgement
come into priority in diagnosis of scabies and may
even include a treatment trial in some cases (Leung
and Miller, 2011). We conclude that sensitivity rate
achieved by trained NMP in this study were higher
than the basic estimation for diagnostic screening
tools.
5 CONCLUSIONS
Active case scabies detection by trained NMP in this
study showed a good sensitivity rate. It might be
applied to high scabies prevalence population. The
cases could be referred to the primary health care
earlier for proper treatment, stop the transmission,
and reduce the morbidity rates. We also recommend
that NMP training on scabies detection must be
implemented periodically to achieve a higher result.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The author wishes to thank Dr. dr. Aria Kekalih, MTI
for the statistical analysis, and dr. Rinadewi
Astriningrum, Sp.KK, dr. Adhimukti T. Sampurna,
Sp.KK, dr. Yudo Irawan, Sp.KK for the contribution
during the study performed. There is no conflict of
interest in this study.
REFERENCES
Arroll, B., Khin, N., Kerse, N., 2003. Screening for
depression in primary care with two verbally asked
questions: cross sectional study. BMJ, 327(7424), pp.
1144-1146.
Boediardja, S.A., Handoko, R.P., 2015. Skabies. In:
Menaldi, S.L., Bramono K, Indriatmi W, editors. Ilmu
Penyakit Kulit dan Kelamin. Jakarta: Badan Penerbit
FKUI, pp. 137-40.
Bujang, M.A., Adnan, T.H., 2016. Requirements for
Minimum Sample Size for Sensitivity and Specificity
Analysis. J Clin Diagn Res, 10(10), YE01-YE6.
Choplin, N.T., Lundy, D.C., 2001. The sensitivity and
specificity of scanning laser polarimetry in the
detection of glaucoma in a clinical setting.
Ophthalmology, 108(5), pp. 899-904.
Goetzinger, K.R., Odibo, A.O., 2011. Statistical analysis
and interpretation of prenatal diagnostic imaging
studies, Part 1: evaluating the efficiency of screening
and diagnostic tests. J Ultrasound Med, 30(8), pp.
1121-1127.
Hilmy, F., 2011. Prevalensi Penyakit Skabies dan
Hubungannya Dengan Karakteristik Santri Pesantren