presented with positive anti LID1-NDO and anti
PGL-I responses (77.05 % and 68.85 %,
respectively). For PB patients presented with positive
anti LID1-NDO and anti PGL-I responses (70% and
60%). In comparative analyses of anti LID1-NDO
and anti PGL-I responses in the statistically strong
correlation. Although serological tests appear to have
a limited ability to aid the diagnosis of PB patients,
our data also identified that a greater number of PB
patients were seropositive for antibodies against
PGL-1 and LID1-NDO. Our data indicate that tests
detecting antibodies to PGL-I and/or LID1-NDO
represent effective tools for the detection of MB and
PB patients.
5 CONCLUSIONS
LID1-NDO is potential to be used in serological tests
for leprosy diagnosis and monitoring, as it performs
to a similar manner to PGL-1.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
To Dr Tsuyoshi Fujiwara, Nara University, Japan, for
generously providing the NT-P-BSA antigen. We
also thank American Leprosy Mission who provided
funding to the Infectious Disease Research Institute
(IDRI).
REFERENCES
Amorim, F.M., Nobre, M.L., Ferreira, L.C., Nascimento,
L.S., Miranda, A.M., Monteiro, G.R.G., Dupnik, K.M.,
Duthie, M.S., Reed, S.G., Jeronimo, S.M.B., 2016.
Identifying Leprosy and Those at Risk of Developing
Leprosy by Detection of Antibodies against LID-1 and
LID-NDO. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 10.
Bührer-Sékula, S., van Beers, S., Oskam, L., Lecco, R.,
Madeira, E.S., Dutra, M.A.L., Luis, M.C., Faber, W.R.,
Klatser, P.R., 2008. The relation between
seroprevalence of antibodies against phenolic
glycolipid-I among school children and leprosy
endemicity in Brazil. Revista da Sociedade Brasileira
de Medicina Tropical 41 Suppl 2, 81–88.
da Conceição Oliveira Coelho Fabri, A., Carvalho, A.P.
aula M., Araujo, S., Goulart, L.R. icardo, de Mattos,
A.M. árcia M., Teixeira, H.C. outo, Goulart, I.M. aria
B., Duthie, M.S., Correa-Oliveira, R., Lana, F.C. arlos
F., 2015. Antigen-specific assessment of the
immunological status of various groups in a leprosy
endemic region. BMC infectious diseases 15, 218.
Duthie, M.S., Goto, W., Ireton, G.C., Reece, S.T., Cardoso,
L.P. V, Martelli, C.M.T., Stefani, M.M.A., Nakatani,
M., De Jesus, R.C., Netto, E.M., Balagon, M.V.F., Tan,
E., Gelber, R.H., Maeda, Y., Makino, M., Hoft, D.,
Reed, S.G., 2007. Use of protein antigens for early
serological diagnosis of leprosy. Clinical and Vaccine
Immunology 14, 1400–1408.
Duthie, M.S., Orcullo, F.M., Abbelana, J., Maghanoy, A.,
Balagon, M.F., 2016. Comparative evaluation of
antibody detection tests to facilitate the diagnosis of
multibacillary leprosy. Applied Microbiology and
Biotechnology 100, 3267–3275.
Duthie, M.S., Raychaudhuri, R., Tutterrow, Y.L., Misquith,
A., Bowman, J., Casey, A., Balagon, M.F., Maghanoy,
A., Beltran-Alzate, J.C., Romero-Alzate, M., Cardona-
Castro, N., Reed, S.G., 2014. A rapid ELISA for the
diagnosis of MB leprosy based on complementary
detection of antibodies against a novel protein-
glycolipid conjugate. Diagnostic Microbiology and
Infectious Disease 79, 233–239.
Hunter, S.W., Fujiwara, T., Brennan, P.J., 1982. Structure
and antigenicity of the major specific glycolipid antigen
of Mycobacterium leprae. Journal of Biological
Chemistry 257, 15072–15078.
Spencer, J.S., Brennan, P.J., 2011. The role of
Mycobacterium leprae phenolic glycolipid I (PGL-I) in
serodiagnosis and in the pathogenesis of leprosy.
Leprosy review 82, 344–57.