because maybe they think this disease is not life-
threatening and would heal itself, and it could be
because of the predisposition factors that still exist on
them (Khairnar R, Khairnar A.,
2017; Fidel PL,
Cutright J. Steele C., 2000; Kalia N, Singh J, Sharma
S, Kamboj SS, Arora H, Kaur M., 2015). Clinical
examination showed edematous and erythematous
vulva and vagina on all patients. This is concordance
that clinical signs of VVC are edematous and
erythematous vulva and vagina. Direct microscopic
result from wet preparation and Gram stain showed
positive and also negative result, but there were no
negative colony culture result. This showed that
direct microscopic examination is only an additional
tool supporting the examination. The negative result
of direct microscopic examination did not exclude the
diagnosis of VVC, but signs of clinical examination
establish the diagnosis (Kundu RV, Garg A., 2013;
Sobel JD, 2008).
There are 3 conventional methods that support
each other. SDA then Cornmeal Tween 80 agar
showed specific characteristic of each species of
Candida. The carbohydrate fermentation test showed
positive result based on the changing color to yellow
on 6 carbohydrate tested and the gas filled in the
Durham tube. CAC revealed the growth of Candida
sp by its colony color. The conventional methods
from 25 samples showed 14 samples of Candida
albicans, and others were Candida non-albicans, 5
samples were Candida glabrata. One sample were
Candida parapsilosis and 4 samples were grown with
2 Candida sp or infected by 2 Candida sp. Result of
samples: 1 sample were combination Candida
albicans with Candida glabrata, 1 sample were
combination of Candida albicans with Candida
famata, and 2 samples: each sample contained
Candida albicans with Candida tropicalis (Suyoso S.
Mucosal candidiasis. In: Bramono K, Suyoso S,
Indriatmi W, Ramali LM, Widaty S, Ervianti E,
editors., 2013; Larone DH, 2011)
In Vitek 2 from 25 samples showed result of
species identification Candida sp 100%, the same as
conventional methods. The highest number species
were on 14 samples (Candida albicans). The
conventional methods need about 36-72 hours to
identify the species , but Vitek 2 only needs 18 hours.
Vitek 2 has more advantages than conventional
methods. Vitek 2 immediately yielded the result of
species by the machine itself, Vitek 2 has faster time
than conventional methods to identify to the species
level and can work automatically so it does not need
manual labour, and it minimizes error (Mona et al.,
2015; Esmat MM, Mohamed T, Abdelrahman AH,
2005).
5 CONCLUSION
The best method of identification of the species is
using the combination of this 3 conventional
methods. Conventional identification methods are
still considered to be the reference standard for the
identification of yeast isolates and also for education
purposes, but are laborious and time-consuming.
Beside that, conventional methods can show
structures of Candida sp clearly that this structures
could not be seen using Vitek 2. Conventional
methods are important and useful for learning fungi
especially in teaching hospital, Dr Soetomo Surabaya
Hospital. A fast and accurate technique for yeast
identification is very important for microbiological
laboratories. According to the results found in the
present study, the Vitek 2 system (from cornmeal-
Tween 80 agar or CAC) identified most clinically
important Candida sp reliably within 18 hours, and
appears to be an excellent alternative identification
method for performing fungal diagnostics.
The result showed the most common yeast
causing VVC was Candida albicans (56%), but there
were increasing of Candida non-albicans that cause
VVC. Most Candida non-albicans are usually
causing antifungal resistance. It is therefore important
that there should be increased awareness among
physicians on the rising prevalence of Candida non-
albicans, due to the reduced susceptibility to azoles.
Prior identification to the species level on VVC is
essential to ensure early diagnosis of Candida non-
albicans infection and in order to give proper
treatment.
REFERENCES
Cassone, A., 2015. Vulvovaginal C andida albicans
infections: pathogenesis, immunity and vaccine
prospects. BJOG: An International Journal of
Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 122(6), pp. 785-794.
Ervianti E, Sawitri, Murtiastutik D, Agusni RI, 2011. The
shifting pattern of Candida sp. causing vulvovaginal
candidiasis and recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis.
Berkala Ilmu Kesehatan Kulit dan Kelamin, 23(3),
189-193.
Esmat, M. M., Mohamed, T., & Abdelrahman, A. H., 2015.
Species Identification and Antifungal Susceptibility
Profile of Candida Isolates from ICU Patients in Sohag
University Hospital, Upper Egypt. The Egyptian
Journal of Medical Microbiology, 24(4), pp. 89-97.
Mona, F., Nasr, E., Ashgan, B., & Mohamed, E. Ahmed H,
2015. Antifungal Susceptibility Pattern and Species
Distribution of Candida Isolates from Patients with