genital ulcer followed by rash on his body, palm and
soles simultaneously. This situation is observed more
common in HIV infected persons than those without
HIV.
The scalp may be involved, resulting in alopecia.
The eyebrows and beard area can be affected as well.
The ‘moth-eaten’ pattern is the most frequent clinical
manifestation of syphilitic alopecia (SA) and
represents one of the most characteristic signs of
secondary syphilis. In the event of suspected
secondary syphilis, the patient should be examined
for the presence of signs compatible with SA,
questioning about any perceived sign of hair loss or
alopecia and examining the scalp in the parieto-
occipital areas, where these signs are more frequently
observed. In case 1, the patient was having hair loss
with moth eaten pattern associated to syphilis
infection, which completely disappeared 8 weeks
after the end of the therapy (Mendoza et al., 2011;
Piraccini et al., 2015).
For most HIV infected persons, serologic tests are
accurate and reliable for the diagnosis of syphilis and
for following a patient’s response to treatment.
Regardless, both treponemal and nontreponemal
serologic tests for syphilis can be interpreted in the
usual manner for most patients who are coinfected
with T. pallidum and HIV. However, atypical
nontreponemal serologic test results (i.e., unusually
high, unusually low, or fluctuating titers) might occur
regardless of HIV-infection status.When clinical
findings are suggestive of syphilis but serologic tests
are nonreactive or their interpretation is unclear,
alternative tests such as biopsy of a lesion, dark-field
examination, and PCR of lesion material might be
useful for diagnosis (Waugh, 2015; CDC, 2015).
Persons with HIV infection and primary or
secondary syphilis should be evaluated clinically and
serologically for treatment failure at 3, 6, 9, 12, and
24 months after therapy. Increased risk of serological
failure has been reported to be more common among
those with late stage of syphilis and HIV-infected
patients (CDC, 2015).
In Case 1, VDRL titer declined
fourfold after 6 month completed therapy. However,
the subsequent follow up sample is needed for further
confirmation of this condition. Different with case 2,
the serologic test is fluctuated and at month-12 the
titer is not decrease to 4-fold.The subsequent follow-
up sample is needed for further confirmation of this
condition. Furthermore, the determination of the
immunocompromised state may be helpful to explain
this phenomenon.
The CDC guidelines for treatment of primary,
secondary, tertiary, and early latent syphilis less than
1 year in HIV patients are very similar compared to
those of HIV-negative patients. Most reports show
that HIV infection does not markedly affect response
to benzathine penicillin therapy. The U.S. Public
Health Service continues to recommend a single dose
of 2.4 million units benzathine penicillin in this
situation. Penicillin is the antibiotic of choice and it is
recommended antibiotic in HIV infected population
because it can reach high concentration in central
nervous system for treatment of neurosyphilis which
is more common in this population. Penicillin
remains not only the most effective treponemicide,
but it is easy to administer, has few side effects and is
relatively inexpensive. Results continue to be
excellent for all forms and stages of treponemal
disease, and there are no signs that T. pallidum has
developed resistance to this antibiotic Mendoza et al.,
2011; Wahab et al., 2013; CDC, 2015; Kinghorn et
al., 2016). In our case also, the treatment with a single
dose of 2.4 million units benzathine penicillin was
given according to stage of syphilis and patient
recovered well after the treatment by decreasing of
the rash on his body and regrowth of hair, but further
evaluation of serological test is needed.It is
recommended that attempts be made to identify, trace
and offer further investigation to at-risk sexual
contacts (Kinghorn et al., 2016).
4 CONCLUSIONS
The importance of our cases is not only about syphilis
and HIV co-infection but to highlight some of the
differences in clinical manifestations and serological
results of syphilis that might be important for
management of such patients.
REFERENCES
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2015. Sexually
transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2015,
MMWR Recommendations and Reports.
doi:10.1097/00008480-200308000-00006
Das, A., Li, J., Zhong, F., Ouyang, L., Mahapatra, T., Tang,
W., Fu, G., Zhao, J., Detels, R., 2015. Factors
associated with HIV and syphilis co-infection among
men who have sex with men in seven Chinese cities. Int
J STD AIDS 26, 145–155.
doi:10.1177/0956462414531560
Holman, K. M., Goepfert A. 2012. Syphilis infection in
women. In: Beigi RH, editor. Sexually transmitted
diseases. London: Wiley-Blackwell;. p. 36-43.
Hu, Q. hai, Xu, J. jie, Zou, H. chun, Liu, J., Zhang, J., Ding,
H. bo, Qian, H.Z., Li, S. ruo, Liu, Y., Jiang, Y. jun,
Shang, H., Wang, N., 2014. Risk factors associated with