2016, was referred to STI clinic in Sardjito General
Hospital, and in there he was diagnosed as
Secondary Syphilis. He didn’t admit that he was
HIV-positive at that time to the doctor in STI clinic.
Benzatin Pennicilin G 2,4 million IU was injected
intramuscularly, and since then, he never came back
for serologic testing after the treatment.
The patient was a consumer of sex worker and
already had a sexual intercourse with more than 4
female sex workers. He also had sexual intercourse
with 1 male partner, usually become the receptive
one. The last time he had intercourse was about 1
year ago with sex worker, after being infected with
HIV.
From the physical examination, the patient was
fully alert and generally in a great condition. On
both of the palms and soles, as well as the scrotum,
there was a defined border erythematous plaque,
with a white scale on the surface of the lesion. Our
differential diagnosis was secondary syphilis,
palmolpantar psoriasis, and tinea manus and pedis.
Skin scraping examination with potassium
hydroxide showed no fungal element. Serologic test
for syphilis was done with results of VDRL 1/64
and TPHA +. Based on clinical and laboratory
examinations, the patient was diagnosed as a
secondary syphilis. The patient was administered
with an injection of Benzathine of Penicillin 2.4
million IU.
After the treatment was given, the patient felt the
reddish plaques improve. Plaques on the scrotum
disappeared, and the lesions on both of the palms
and soles have faded. However the patient
complained of blurred vision in both of his eyes, so
we refer the patient to the ophtalmology department.
Based from examination with ophtalmoscope, there
was an inflammation in the left retina and a keratitis
in the right cornea. Visus for both of his eye were
6/18 for the right eye, and 1/300 for the left one. He
was assesed as retinitis syphilis, with a differential
diagnosis of retinitis CMV, because laboratory
examination showed results of increased level of
IgG Anti CMV (28 UA/mL), but with a normal level
of IgM Anti CMV (0,1 UA/mL). He was given
erythromycin eye drop for his right eye, but no
treatment for the left one. The patient was also
complaining about headache, so we refer the patient
to neurology department and to get CSF
examination. In neurology department, MRI was
done with normal results, but they didn’t do a
lumbal puncture examination. The patient was
assessed as Tension Headache and was given
NSAID to relieve his headache.
3 DISCUSSION
In this report, we described a case of secondary
syphilis with suspected retinitis due to syphilis in a
patient with AIDS. Retinal involvement due to
syphilis has been described in individuals with
advanced HIV infection (Shinha and Weaver, 2016;
Matsuo et al., 2017; Wells et al., 2017; Maves et al.,
2008; Doris et al., 2006). Our case posed a
diagnostic challenge since the fundoscopic findings
were also suspicious for viral retinitis, particularly
CMV. CMV retinitis is characterized by dense
retinal whitening, which can vary in appearance
from “fluffy” to “dry and granular.” Hemorrhage is
frequently present, but in highly variable amounts,
and may be absent (Heiden et al., 2007). In our case,
ophthalmologist department only mention about
inflammation and dilated vessel in the left retina.
Retinitis CMV doesn’t need to be checked for
laboratory examinations, the diagnosis could be
made just from clinical presentation which is typical
(Heiden et al., 2007). Based from the examination
results from the ophthalmologist, we still can’t draw
out a conclusion about the retinitis, is it due to
syphilis or CMV.
Though ocular syphilis is typically thought to
occur in the secondary or tertiary stages of syphilis,
it can occur at any stage. Panuveitis is the most
common complication associated with ocular
syphilis; however, it can affect nearly all ocular
structures. Patients may present with eye pain, vision
loss, floaters or photophobia. The diagnosis of
ocular syphilis includes serologic evidence of
syphilis and clinical symptoms or signs consistent
with ocular disease, but there are almost no eye
findings that are absolutely specific for syphilis. As
ocular syphilis may be associated with
neurosyphilis, a lumbar puncture should be
performed (Powell and Carbo, 2017). The United
States Center for Disease Control and Prevention
recommends performing a lumbar puncture to
evaluate for neurosyphilis in all individuals with
ocular syphilis.
Examination of the CSF is mandatory in patients
with syphilitic optic neuritis to confirm the diagnosis
of neurosyphilis and subsequently to plan treatment.
Major indications of performing a lumbar puncture
in patients with ocular syphilis are: 1) syphilis with
neurological involvement, 2) re-treatment of patients
with a relapse, 3) before treatment with a non-
penicillin regimen, and 4) infants with congenital
syphilis (Dutta et al., 2017). In our case, lumbar
puncture wasn’t performed by neurology
department. This is a weakness in our report,