the family. It is the cause of the elderly have not
chosen by complete end of life care. Based on
Indonesian culture, the elderly are important
members of the extended family. Their family,
especially their children, have a close relationship
with them (Riasmini, Sahar, & Resnawati, 2013), so,
every decision must be discussed with the family.
A third of the respondents who made the
selection are no different to the seven other
respondents regarding age, MMSE, or level of
education. Improved knowledge, self-affection and
behavior are also evident. This may be caused by
their health being less favorable than other
respondents. They already have limitations such as
difficulty in walking, accompanied by post-stroke
disorders. This is what allowed a third of
respondents to make a choice for end-of-life care.
The Asian culture allows discussion about a
person's chronic disease, but this is carried out by
health personnel and takes place with family or
people close to and not directly with the patient.
Family support is strongly associated with selection
decisions about end of life (Bravo et al., 2012; Lim
et al., 2012; Goodman et al., 2013). Lim et al. (2012)
also state that discussion regarding the end of life in
the Asian culture is still considered taboo. Modified
ACP stages 1 and 2 have helped respondents discuss
end-of-life healthcare, but respondents are still not
open to discussing it.
Stress affects perception response. In this study,
stress perception relates to knowledge and
confidence. Perceptual responses in this study are
the end-of-life preferences. This study showed no
difference in the theory. Improved knowledge and
changes in confidence are not concomitant with the
election of end-of-life care chosen by the elderly
(Putra, 2011). Knowledge and confidence in the
experimental group increased, but only a few
respondents could discuss end-of-life care planning.
This could be caused by the video provided not
being based on condition of Indonesian culture. So,
there are cultural factors that need to be considered
in the formation of perceptual responses. The
inability of the elderly to imagine the quality of their
lives under certain circumstances, the so-called
''paradoxical defect'', and the benefits and
disadvantages of the treatment received may be the
reason that not all elderly people are capable of
discussing and planning the end of their lives
(Volandes et al., 2009; Deep et al., 2010).
This study has several limitations. ACP
programs only used phase 1 and 2; phases 3–5 have
not been carried out due to the time constraints of
the study. Videos that were played by the
researchers were taken from Australia and Taiwan
with dialogue in English and Mandarin, so
respondents may have had difficulty understanding
the contents of the video, although it was translated
into Indonesian. Discussions during Phase 2 did not
include the family. A small number of respondents
were included because it was challenging to
persuade respondents to join this research. In the
future, a larger number should be included to
achieve more reliable results. Researchers advice on
further research includes involving the family in
Phase 2 of the ACP and create videos regarding
dementia and ACP based on Indonesian culture.
This would facilitate all respondents making end-of-
life care decisions. Nurses and nursing can motivate
the elderly to make plans for their end-of-life care
through the ACP modification program, as an
independent nursing intervention.
5 CONCLUSIONS
An accurate and timely discussion of diseases and
end-of-wlife care will help patients communicate
with family and loved ones. ACP can give the
elderly a real chance to have control over the
ultimate choice of their lives. By educating the
elderly on the topic of early treatment planning and
effectively communicating and involving the
families and medical personnel involved, nurses can
provide patients with the best opportunity to make
sure that others respect the final decision of their
life.
REFERENCES
Abel, J. et al. (2013) ‘The impact of advance care
planning of place of death, a hospice retrospective
cohort study,’ BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care,
3(2), pp. 168–173. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2012-
000327.
Bert P.M. Creeemers and Creemers, B. P. M. (2007)
‘Combining different ways of learning and teaching in
a dynamic model of educational effectiveness,’
Journal of Basic Education, 17(1), pp. 1–39.
Blackford, J. and Street, A. F. (2013) ‘Facilitating advance
care planning in community palliative care:
conversation starters across the client journey,’
International Journal Of Palliative Nursing, 19(3), pp.
132–139. doi: 10.12968/ijpn.2013.19.3.132.
Bravo, G. et al. (2012) ‘Promoting advance planning for
health care and research among older adults: A
randomized controlled trial,’ BMC Medical Ethics.
BioMed Central Ltd, 13(1), p. 1. doi: 10.1186/1472-