![](bg2.png)
management, and 122 (99%) students havebehavior
preparedness that indicates they are not ready.
Firmansyah (2014) explains that this is happening
because most students never learn about disaster
management. Based on a preliminary study by
researchers on April 16, 2017, using a questionnaire
with adolescents in Randuagung Village about the
knowledge of industrial disaster mitigation, it was
found that 2 people (20%) had good knowledge of
mitigation, 3 people were aware enough (30%), and
5 people (50%) were less aware of industrial disaster
mitigation. Among Randuagung Village youth, with
regard to preparedness in industrial disaster
management, there were only 2 people (20%) who
were totally prepared , and 8 people (80%) who still
had not taken any action. The lack of knowledge
among young people in Randuagung Village is due
to the fact that teenagers get less information and
socialization about industrial disaster management.
National Disaster Management Authority or
BNPB (2011) explains that industrial disaster is an
accident caused by two factors, namely unsafe
human acts and unsafe conditions. The damage
mechanisms caused by industrial disasters can be
explosions that result in death, injury, and damage to
buildings and infrastructure that can release harmful
pollutants (Coburn, 1994). The most effective way
of dealing with industrial disasters is to reduce the
possible causes of the disaster to minimize the losses
that will arise (BNPB 2008). Important factors in
industrial disaster management are comprehensive
structural and non-structural mitigation, spatial
planning, and law enforcement (Sari, 2016).
Mitigation is an obligation of various parties,
including experts, governments, and especially
people affected by industrial disasters. The active
participation of communities in pre-disaster
management is essential to reduce the risks of plant
fire disasters (BNPB, 2008). Such active
participation includes actions to monitor pollution
levels, to ensure inspection and enforcement of
existing standards, and to improve security laws and
prepare evacuation plans (Coburn et al., 1994).
The approach in this study uses behavioral
theory based on the theory presented by Lawrence
Green, which states that a person’s behavior is
influenced by three factors, namely predisposing
factors (knowledge, attitude, experience, trust,
values, beliefs), supporting factors (availability of
health facilities, access to health facilities,
government regulations and surrounding
communities, health capabilities), and drivers
(family support, attitudes and behavior of health
workers, peer attitudes and behavior, motivation).
These three factors influence one’s behavior
(Nursalam, 2016). Knowledge is a key factor and a
key to preparedness. Knowledge possessed can
usually affect one’s attitude and awareness to be
ready for alert in anticipating the disaster (BNPB
2008). Knowledge about disasters should be given to
the community, especially adolescents because they
are part of the community with an important role to
play in the effort to anticipate and handle the disaster
(Maryani, 2010). Mitigation planning should aim to
develop a disaster “security culture” in which people
are fully aware of the dangers they face, protect
themselves as far as they can, and fully support the
efforts made for their protection. Anyone living in
hazard-prone areas should understand the dangers as
a fact of life.
The approach in this study uses behavioral
theory based on the PRECEDE (Predisposing,
Reinforcing, and Enabling Cause in Educational
Diagnosis and Evaluation) is a guide in analyzing or
diagnosing and evaluating behavior for intervention.
PROCEED (Policy, Regulatory, Organizational
Construct in Educational and Environmental
Development) presented by Lawreance Green,
which states that a person’s behavior is influenced
by three factors, namely predisposing factors
(knowledge, attitude, experience, trust, values,
beliefs), supporting factors (availability of health
facilities health, access to health facilities,
government regulations and surrounding
communities, health capabilities), and drivers
(family support, attitudes and behavior of health
workers, peer attitudes and behavior, motivation).
These three factors influence one’s behavior
(Nursalam, 2016). Knowledge is a key factor and a
key to preparedness. Knowledge owned possessed
can usually can affect the one’s attitude and
awareness to be ready for alert in anticipating the
disaster (BNPB, 2008). The aim of this research was
to explain the relationship between knowledge,
attitude, and experience about industrial disaster
mitigation and preparedness with teenagers.
2 METHODS
The research used a cross-sectional design to assess
the relation between variables. The population was
15-18-year-old teenagers who lived in areas prone to
industrial disaster, which were the hamlets of
Manangkuli, Setinggi, and Randubowo in
Randuagung Village, Kebomas, Gresik district. The
population number was 1,183 people. By using
simple random sampling of probability, the sampling
selection was done and 109 respondents were
found.The research instrument was a questionnaire
extracted from books called “Integrating Manmade
Hazard Into Mitigation Planning (2003)” and
INC 2018 - The 9th International Nursing Conference: Nurses at The Forefront Transforming Care, Science and Research
258