want to become pregnant are less likely to choose
long-term contraceptive methods (Gomez and
Freihart, 2017). Respondents who have high
interpersonal factors but do not choose
contraception, have less family income than MSEs.
The economic level of a person can also affect the
selection of IUD contraceptives. Users of IUDs will
increase along with the improvement of one's
economic status (İnal et al., 2017).
Most women of fertile couples in the village of
Kepuh Klagen have low self-efficacy levels and
some have high self-efficacy levels. Respondents
with low self-efficacy mostly chose not to use IUD
contraception. The results show that there is a weak
relationship between self-efficacy with IUD
contraceptive selection in women of fertile couples
in Kepuh Klagen Village.
The Health Promotion Model Theories explain
that self-efficacy or a person's belief that he or she
can successfully perform an action will increase
commitment in planning action. Self-efficacy is
influenced by the way a person thinks, feels,
motivates themself, and performs actions (Bandura,
2002). There are three indicators of one's self-
efficacy: the belief in using IUD contraceptives to
prevent pregnancy, information obtained, and
convenience in IUD use. Sufficient information has
been obtained. Respondents believe that IUD
contraceptives can prevent pregnancy. However,
respondents felt anxious about the convenience of
using IUD contraception. Most respondents who
have a high level of self-efficacy choose to use IUD
contraception. Those who have received clear
information about IUD contraception are convinced
to use the contraceptive in preventing pregnancy.
Conversely, respondents who lacked information
about IUD contraceptives were not sure about using
IUD contraceptives.
There are four factors that can affect one's self-
efficacy. First is past experience. Success can build a
person's confidence and self-efficacy. Failure can
tear it down, especially if the failure occurs before
the person's self-efficacy is formed. The researcher
did not identify the prior family history of the
respondent so no data could corroborate the theory.
The second factor is the experience of others who
have succeeded. In Desa Kepuh Klagen, there are
still very few IUD users so that they do not build
self-efficacy in IUD contraceptive selection. The
third factor is social persuasion. Persuasion from the
social environment can increase the motivation to
accomplish the task given. There is a lack of social
support in Desa Kepuh Klagen in IUD contraceptive
selection so that self-efficacy is not formed. The last
factor is the psychological response. Respondents
feel anxious about the convenience of using IUD
contraception so as to decrease self-efficacy.
There are still many females of childbearing age
with a high level of self-efficacy but do not choose
to use IUD contraception. This can be influenced by
several factors such as the level of education and
husband support (Hartini, Ikhsan and Salmah, 2014).
For example, one respondent was under 20 years of
age with basic education. The lack of support from
the husband and the nearest person is seen from the
low interpersonal factors. This may cause the
respondents to choose not to use IUD contraception
despite having high self-efficacy levels.
A person's educational level may affect the
choice of IUD contraceptives. Someone who is more
open to new science chooses effective contraception
as a result of their higher level of education (İnal et
al., 2017). A mother's work is mostly as a
housewife. It can also affect the lack of information
obtained about IUD contraceptives due to lack of
socialization with others. Mothers engage in more
activities at home and socialize only with the
neighbors around them. Social influences also
determine the selection of contraception (Gomez and
Freihart, 2017). The experience shared by the
nearest person who has used the IUD as well as the
direct support of the husband accompanying them to
the clinic to consult on contraceptive choices may
increase women's confidence (Gottert et al., 2017).
Most respondents only obtain information from one
source and the majority gain KB information from
health workers. Lack of information or knowledge
can affect a person's contraceptive choice (Hartini,
Ikhsan and Salmah, 2014). In addition, the type of
KB used at this time and the duration of its use also
a dapt affect one's choice. There were respondents
who had used injectable contraceptives for more
than 10 years. Success can build a person's
confidence and self-efficacy. The respondents have
had high self-efficacy against the use of injectable
contraception so it is not easy to switch to another
type of contraception.
5 CONCLUSIONS
Women of childbearing age in Desa Kepuh Klagen
mostly chose non-IUD contraception i.e. injection.
Women of childbearing age in Desa Kepuh Klagen
mostly have low interpersonal factors in IUD
contraceptive selection and obtain less support from
family or nearest person to use IUD contraception.
Most women of childbearing age in Desa Kepuh
Klagen have low self-efficacy levels in IUD
contraceptive selection and they are mostly
uncomfortable using IUD contraceptives to prevent
pregnancy. The higher the interpersonal factor of a
woman of childbearing age, the more likely she will
The Correlation between Interpersonal Factors, Self-Efficacy with the Choice of IUD Contraception among Women of Childbearing Age
Couples
353