hyperglycemia, which triggers some serious
macrovascular or microvascular complications such
as heart disease, peripheral vascular disease, renal
failure, neurological damage and blindness
(PERKENI 2011).
One of the nursing models that has been
developed in nursing care is the conservation model
developed by Mira E. Levine. The model is oriented
towards energy conservation, structural integrity,
personal integrity, and social integrity, which focuses
on enhancing the client's ability to adapt as closely as
possible to achieve optimal quality of life. The
conservation model approach pioneered by Myra
Estrin Levine is appropriate to improve self-care
behavior of patients so that management of diabetes
can be optimal.
This conservation model enables nurses to help
individuals achieve their own integrity. This model
provides guidance on how nurse-client relationships
focus on the influence and response of clients to
promote client integrity through conservation
principles. Interventions to maintain network
integrity, energy conservation, personal and
psychosocial integrity (Levine 1966).
2 METHODS
2.1 Study Design
This research type was quasi experiment research
with design of Nonequivalent Control Group Design
or Non-Randomized Control Group Pretest-Postest
Design, which was pseudo experiment by dividing
the existing group without distinguish control and
group significantly by still referring to the existing
natural form.
2.2 Study Population, Sampling and
Variables
Population in this research was all patient of type 2
DM who registered to member of Prolanis at
Puskesmas Kesamben that is as much as 38. Based on
formula of sample for analytical numerical pairs
obtained sample 16 respondents for each group. This
research used purposive sampling method.
Variable in this research consist of two variables,
namely independent variable (free) and dependent
variable (dependent). The independent variable in this
research is Levine Conservation model application.
While the dependent variable is self-care activity.
2.3 Intervention
The study was conducted in two stages, i.e. by
allocating the sample into two groups (treatment
group and control group). Furthermore, the
researchers conducted pre-test of self-efficacy and
quality of life in the treatment group and control
group. The study was conducted for 2 months.
According to research conducted by Shi (2010)
changes in self-care activity can be seen immediately
after the implementation of an intervention and
changes in quality of life can be seen after 1-2 weeks
after the implementation of the intervention.
2.4 Data Analysis
The data analysed by using Kolmogorov–Smirnov
Test for normality testing and Paired T test and
Independent T test for different test with α=0.05.
3 RESULTS
The result showed that the level of self-care
activity of respondents in the treatment group before
the intervention, mostly in the medium category, i.e.
9 respondents (56.3%). After intervention, the level
of self-efficacy of respondents increased, i.e. most
respondents i.e. 8 people (50%) had self-efficacy
level in high category. While for the level of self-care
activity responder in control group during pre-test
mostly were in medium category that were 9
respondent (56.3%). While at post-test, most of self-
care activity level of respondent was in high category
as many as 15 respondents (93.8%) (see table 1).
While in table 2 it can be seen that the increase of
self-care activity that occurs in the treatment group
was higher than in the control group, that is the
average increase of self-efficacy value in the
treatment group by 19 compared to the control group
which was only 0.15.
Based on the results of normality test by using
Kolmogorov-Smirnov test on Self-care activity
variable in treatment group and control group it can
be seen that p> α (0.05) so it can be stated that all data
is normally distributed. Meanwhile, based on
homogeneity test results as listed in table 5.16 using
Levine's Test on self-efficacy and quality of life in the
treatment group and control group, it can be seen that
p> α (0.05) so it can be stated that all data is
homogeneous.
The result of paired t test in the treatment group
with t value of -8.061 and p 0.000 <0.05 (α), meaning
there is difference of self-care activity before