Potency Exploration of Trowulan Cultural Heritage Area as
Educational Facility
Retno Eka Pramitasari, Nur Muflihah
Universitas Hasyim Asy’ari, Jombang, Indonesia
Keywords: Exploration, Cultural Heritage, Educational Facility.
Abstract: Trowulan is a very popular cultural heritage area in Mojokerto city and designated as a National Tourism
Strategic Area which is thick with cultural and historical elements. The purpose of this study to explore the
tourism and cultural heritage potency in Trowulan area as education facility. The object of this research is the
existing cultural heritage in the Trowulan area including Bajang Ratu Gate, Petirtaan Tikus, Brahu Temple
and Majapahit Information Center. This study used descriptive research with a qualitative approach and
sampling techniques using purposive sampling techniques. The results of this study indicated that the majority
of visitors who are student-certified were 52.5%, the response of visitors related to the perception of the
attractiveness of the tourist environment was 62.1% very interesting, and the perception of tourist accessibility
to visitors responds 76.4% supported this condition. Visitors expressed satisfaction with the facilities and
activities in the tourism object. This proved that the Trowulan cultural heritage area can be used for holidays
and educational facility.
1 INTRODUCTION
Indonesia is a country that is rich in history and
culture in the past, namely the existence of kingdom
spread among others the Majapahit kingdom,
Singasari kingdom, Sriwijaya kingdom, and Kutai
kingdom. This can be proven by the presence of
artefacts in the form of sculpture, statues, and
temples. Every cultural heritage has historical value
and knowledge (Rahmi and Qiram, 2018). Trowulan
is a tourism area that has a great history for
civilization in Indonesia, where there are relics at
Majapahit's heyday. As a city, the Trowulan site
stores many cultural heritage objects from various
aspects of life that are interesting to be learned.
Trowulan is a place that has potency that can be
developed both in national and international regions
(Sektiadi, 2016). This potency can develop in line
with the interest and motivation of the community
who can participate in preserving and widely
introducing Trowulan tourism areas as tourism areas
and educational facilities.
However, there are still some communities,
especially Mojokerto residents who don't know those
places, haven't even visited the tourism object. There
are also people who do not know, that Trowulan has
the potency as a tourism place, a media of educating
both history and culture. Likewise with people in
several large cities, there are among them who do not
know the historical sites and religious tourism in
Trowulan. This raises concerns about the Majapahit
kingdom site, especially the temple, which should be
protected and preserved.
Some tourist areas that have historical value
certainly have their own appeal for visitors to make a
tour. This can be a motivation for the community to
participate in developing and disseminating both
location information, tourist conditions and values
contained in the tourist attractions. According to the
results of the 2016 East Java museum's cultural
heritage visitor report, the Majapahit museum in
Trowulan Mojokerto is still the favourite from year to
year. This can be seen in Table 1.
Table 1. Shows the ranking of visitors to the
museum in East Java. Where Majapahit became the
first rank site that is often visited by tourists, because
this museum keeps the Majapahit Kingdom and some
other remains from various regions in East Java.
Pramitasari, R. and Muflihah, N.
Potency Exploration of Trowulan Cultural Heritage Area as Educational Facility.
DOI: 10.5220/0008408401050108
In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Innovation (ICLI 2018), pages 105-108
ISBN: 978-989-758-391-9
Copyright
c
2019 by SCITEPRESS – Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved
105
Table 1: 2016 East Java museum's cultural heritage visitor
report (Balai Pelestarian Cagar Budaya, 2016).
No
Name
Location
Number of
Tourists
1
Museum
Majapahit
Trowulan,
Mojokerto
146.689
2
Museum
Sumenep
Sumenep
41.246
3
Museum Trinil
Ngawi
21.811
4
Museum
Penataran
Blitar
6.734
5
Museum
Airlangga
Kediri
6.575
The Trowulan site also has support from the
World Monument Fund (WMF), an international
organization engaged in preserving cultural heritage
with one of its programs, namely the World
Monument Watch releasing a list of threatened
heritage sites. Trowulan is included in the World
Endangered Site and will be listed as the 2014 World
Monument Watch (Davison and McConville, 1991).
This study aims to describe the characteristics of
visitors who travel to Trowulan cultural heritage,
activities carried out by visitors and know the
response of visitors to tourist attractions but also to
explore the potentcy of cultural heritage tourism areas
in Trowulan including Bajang Ratu Gate, Petirtaan
Tikus, Candi Brahu, and Majapahit Information
Center as an effort to preserve Majapahit cultural
heritage and as a education media (Abadiyah, 2014;
Wijaya, Bahruddin and Hidayat, 2015). Movable
cultural heritage objects are mostly stored in the
Majapahit Information Center or better known as the
Trowulan museum, while immovable cultural
heritage objects are scattered in several villages and
some have been successfully restored by the Project
for the Development of Former Antiquities History of
the Majapahit Kingdom City works with the Cultural
Heritage Conservation Center (Fitri, Ahmad and
Ahmad, 2015).
2 METHOD
This research is an exploratory research using
descriptive analysis. This study used purposive
sampling as a sampling technique, in which
researchers set several criteria’s, including samples
taken at each place of tourism a number of 30 people,
visitors who were used as data collection at a
minimum level of junior high school education. The
place used in the study were 4 Trowulan cultural
heritage objects, which included Bajang Ratu Gate,
Petirtaan Tikus, Brahu Temple and Majapahit
Information Center (PIM).
Preparation Research Concept of Potential
Exploration Study of Trowulan Tourism Area as
Education Facility in Mojokerto Regency is carried
out systematically so that the direction and objectives
of the research do not deviate from the problems that
have been formulated at the beginning of the study.
Based on the research implementation approach
that used qualitative research approaches commonly
with triangulation in data collection techniques, the
methods used in the collection and information
implementation in this study were:
2.1 Observation
This technique allows the researcher to draw
inferences (conclusions) about the meaning and point
of view of the sources, events, or processes observed.
Through this observation, researchers will see for
themselves the unspoken understanding (tacit
understanding), how the theory is used directly
(theory-in-use) and the point of view of sources that
may not be grieved through interviews or surveys
2.2 In Depth Interview
Primary data sources or main data related to the
problems in this study were obtained from the results
of in-depth interviews conducted by researchers on
key informants. Determination of informants was
done by purposive sampling technique. Purposive
sampling was a sample determination technique with
certain considerations.
2.3 Documentation
Documents were notes of past events. Documents can
be in the form of writing, pictures, or monumental
works from someone. Document study was a
complement to the use of observation and interview
methods in qualitative research to obtain more
credible / trustworthy research results
Based on the data collected, since the observations
were made, the data was actually analysed or
interpreted by the researcher. Nevertheless, the
results obtained must be explored and synthesized, so
that resulting new propositions and conclusions.
3 RESULT AND DISCUSSION
Cultural heritage tourism area is one of the objects
that are used by visitors to enjoy the beauty, learn the
historical and cultural values contained in each place
ICLI 2018 - 2nd International Conference on Learning Innovation
106
of tourism object. Based on the results of observations
of research conducted, that the majority of visitors
were students from kindergarten, elementary school,
junior high school, senior high school and some ar e
college students. Based on the results of the study,
52.5% of visitors were students, 16.7% were self-
employed, 8.3% were private workers and 22.5%
were civil servants. This was in accordance with the
purpose of visiting tourism object which stated that
45% of the Middle Semester Activities (KTS) have
been held by schools and 46.7% of visitors aimed to
have a vacation, 5.8% of visitors wanted to know the
culture of tourism objects and 2.5% visitors did
research which was one of the final project of KTS.
Tourists who visited the Trowulan cultural heritage
tourism object stated that 90.8% of the tourism
objects were interesting and felt happy about the
visited tourism objects, 9.2% felt unattractive and
unhappy, this was caused by visitors got little
information that supported the tourism object of
cultural heritage as an education media, both in the
form of brochures and tour guides. As many as 68.3%
stated that they first visited Trowulan's cultural
heritage objects, and there were no visitors who had
more than five visits. In addition, tourists visited
together with tour groups at 68.3%, with friends at
18.3% and at 13.3% with family. The largest tourism
group were 68.3% of the school group and 5.8%
visited with the recitation group.
Based on the results of the research obtained, it
shows that cultural heritage tourism in Trowulan has
the potential as a means of education for visitors.
Visitors stated 62.1% very attractive both in terms of
beauty, historical and cultural lesson views. This is in
accordance with the support of the visitors, if the
Trowulan tourist area was used as an educational
facility.
The visitors had various responses about the
objects in Trowulan. This could be seen from the
results regarding the perception of the attractiveness
of the tourist environment, which included the beauty
of the temple, views of the park, history lessons,
cultural lessons showed 62.1% of visitors felt very
attractive and 37.9% said it was interesting. This
results had an impact for the convenience and
satisfaction of activities done by visitors in the tour,
which can be seen in the Figure 1.
Based on the Figure 1, visitors stated that 24.4%
felt comfortable while enjoying the park view, the
temple view, learned the historical value and cultural
values and the level of satisfaction reached 38.5%.
Whereas, 75.6% of visitors stated that they were very
comfortable in doing tour activities and 61.5% of
visitors were very satisfied with all the activities
carried out at Trowulan's cultural heritage objects.
This can be seen from the variety of activities carried
out by visitors from enjoying the beauty of the
scenery, looking for information about visited
objects, taking pictures together, even joking
together. In addition, there were also visitor
perceptions about the accessibility of Trowulan
cultural heritage objects, which can be seen in the
Table 2.
Figure 1: The graph of visitor activity chart.
Table 2: Perception of visitors against tourism accessibility.
Accessibility
Not
Suppor
t
Less
Suppor
t
Suppor
t
Highly
Suppor
t
Entrance
0
6,7%
53,3%
40%
Transportatio
n Availability
0
0
91,7%
8,3%
Sign Posts
0
0
84,2%
15,8%
In entrance access, 40% of visitors said they were
very supported, 53.3% of visitors said supported and
6.7% of visitors said they were less supported, this
was because there were some dusty road conditions
and clay that was scattered due to project activities.
Visitors responded that 91.7% supported and 8.3%
very supported of the transportation availability
facilities that were easily available to get to tourism
objects, due to the location of tourism objects close to
major highways. In addition, road signs also
determined the convenience of visitors on the way to
tourism objects, a number of 84.2% visitors expressed
to support and 15.8% visitors said they very
supported.
Perceptions of tourism facilities also affected in
terms of travel, which in the presence of a good and
supportive response can improve and develop
existing facilities in tourism objects and supporting
booster of tourism objects exploration both
domestically and abroad. The facilities contained in
Trowulan's cultural heritage objects include parking
lots, information centers, places of worship, reading
Potency Exploration of Trowulan Cultural Heritage Area as Educational Facility
107
places, trash bins, toilets, gazebo, parks and souvenirs
shop. The facility can be known about its physical and
cleanliness conditions to determine the utilization
satisfaction level by tourists. The Visitors' responses
regarding these conditions can be seen in the Figure
2.
Figure 2: The graph of perception
Based on Figure 2 explained that 50.1% of visitors
stated that the physical condition of cultural heritage
tourism facilities was very good, 47.2% of visitors
stated that the condition was good and 2.7% of
visitors stated that their physical condition was not
good, this could be due to some minor damage to the
facilities provided. Visitors' perceptions to tourism
facilities in their cleanliness conditions on the graph
above obtained 46.8% of visitors stated that they were
very clean, 52.1% of visitors stated that they were
clean and 1.3% of visitors said they were not clean,
this could be due to the large number of visitors used
facilities so that there were visitors who felt the
cleanliness conditions at the facility were reduced.
Visitor satisfaction in the use of the facilities
provided in Trowulan cultural heritage tourism
objects depicted in the graph above showed that
41.9% of visitors expressed their satisfaction, 52.5%
of visitors expressed satisfaction and 5.56% of
visitors stated that they were not satisfied. Visitors
felt dissatisfied can be caused because the number of
available facilities was less fulfil when the number of
visitors increased in the same day and time, such as a
parking lot, where visitors found it was difficult to
park the vehicle when increasing the number of
visitors at the same time, as well as parking which
was separated from the location of the tourism object,
which was due to the renovation of the parking lot.
The visitors agreed on the existence of
sustainability management that must be done by
every layer of society, but there were some visitors a
number of 2.5% who stated that they did not agree to
the sustainability management of Trowulan cultural
heritage tourism, because the visitors thought that it
was enough, both of beauty scenery and facilities
provided. Basically visitors strongly agreed to the
preservation activity of cultural heritage result in
order to keep well both now and in the future. Besides
that it could be used as an education media, both
historical and cultural values in every tourism object.
4 CONCLUSION
The result of the research conducted at Trowulan's
cultural heritage tourism object have the potency that
support the activities of traveling and educating, both
in terms of the attraction of tourism environmental
object, accessibility of tourism object, and available
facilities. Visitors feel less happy to travel in the
Trowulan cultural heritage tourism object a number
of 9.2%, due to lack of information that supports
Trowulan's cultural heritage tourism object as an
education media. Less information received, for
example from information boards and brochures.
Writing that are on the board contains less
information, some of them begin to fade so that it is
less clear to be read and learned. While brochures,
some of the visitors don't even find out who don't
know about the brochures distributed as basic
information on the tourism object.
REFERENCES
Abadiyah, N. S. (2014) ‘The Usage of Brahu Temple Sites
as a Ritual Activity of Buddha Religion’, e-Journal of
Historical Education, 2(1).
Balai Pelestarian Cagar Budaya (2016) Laporan
Pengunjung Museum Situs Bersejarah Jawa Timur.
Davison, G. and McConville, C. (1991) A Heritage
handbook. North Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
Fitri, I., Ahmad, Y. and Ahmad, F. (2015) ‘Conservation of
tangible cultural heritage in Indonesia: a review current
national criteria for assessing heritage value’, Procedia-
Social and Behavioral Sciences, 184, pp. 7178.
Rahmi, M. and Qiram, I. (2018) ‘Potency of Education
Historical Tourismof World War II Japanese Cavesand
Bunkersin Coastal Banyuwangi’, IOP Conference
Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 156(1).
Sektiadi, S. (2016) Majapahit in two perspective. Jakarta:
Arsari Djojohadikusumo Foundation.
Wijaya, E. S. K., Bahruddin, M. and Hidayat, W. (2015)
‘Penciptaan Buku Referensi Situs Gapura Bajang Ratu
sebagai Upaya Pelestarian Warisan Budaya Majapahit’,
Jurnal Desain Komunikasi Visual, 4(2).
ICLI 2018 - 2nd International Conference on Learning Innovation
108