and evaluation. Curriculum 2013 has not been long
held, but it encounters a number of obstacles. A
research conducted by (Krissandi and Rusmawan,
2015), reveals the five obstacles in the
implementation of the 2013 curriculum; they are
governments, institutions, teachers, parents, and
students. Obstacles faced by government include
books distribution, evaluation sheets, bureaucracy,
time allocations, and implementation guidelines.
Obstacles faced by institutions include school facility,
and teacher’s schedule. Next, Obstacles faced by the
teachers were mainly on the understanding and
implementation of the curriculum. Finally, parents
and students perceive the report books and adaptation
to the thematic learning as the main obstacles.
This is aroused from preliminary study in a
number of elementary schools in Yogyakarta, that the
researcher obtained the following information: 1) a
lot of classroom teachers are not able to implement
the thematic learning 2), some of the teachers find
number of mistakes and inappropriate materials in the
book, 3) teachers find it hard in assessing the K13, 4)
teachers find troubles in time allocation.
Muhammadiyah Primary School Bodon is one that
has implemented the 2013 curriculum. Based on the
interviews with classroom teachers, they have been
using teacher book and student’s books in learning,
but the materials are not in line with the real situation.
In addition, it was also revealed that character
education was not clearly elaborated. The research
conducted by (Zuchdi et al., 2014) also explains that
character education in primary schools in Yogyakarta
Province has been well planned. However, based on
the analysis of lesson plans created by teachers, there
were some which did not contain the target values.
Many teachers still find difficulties in constructing
the lesson plans.
On the other hands, based on the observation on
the students in grade I the researcher discovered many
students were unable to show positive attitudes. For
example, mocking among students, using ngoko
(low-class Javanese language) when talking to the
teacher, not saying thank you or please, sitting on the
table, and being inattentive during lesson. To be
easily accepted, the values integrated in the materials
should originate from local wisdom in each region.
According (Wagiran, 2013), exploring the values of
local knowledge is an effort to build nation character
in modern era. Education based on local wisdom
teaches learners to always engage themselves to the
real situations. Therefore, it becomes an underlying
reason for developing thematic SSP based on local
wisdom for primary school.
Based on the problems, the researcher aims at
developing SSP based on local wisdom which is
tailored to students’ needs, by integrating the values
with a comprehensive components. They are: 1)
syllabus, 2) lesson plan, 3) materials, 4) Students
Worksheet, and 5) assessment form. It is expected to
display coherent and cohesive learning plan starting
from the analysis of basic competence to the
assessment forms.
2 LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Subject Specific Pedagogy
Subject Specific Pedagogy (SSP) was first introduced
by Shulman as PCK (Pedagogical Content
Knowledge). Shulman explains that a professional
teacher should have correct knowledge of
Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) (Anwar,
Rustaman and Widodo, 2012). As agents of change,
teachers should continue developing teaching process
and improve their abilities in designing the learning,
one of which is by the PCK. Pedagogical Content
Knowledge is knowledge about alternative concept to
be understood by teachers and prospective teachers.
It also guides them to organize, compile, and access
the subject matter, which are all summarized in PCK
(Shulman, 1986).
PCK enables teachers to transform materials into
contextual learning activities. (Van Driel, Verloop
and de Vos, 1988) also defines Pedagogical Content
Knowledge as comprehensive knowledge signifying
teacher’s wisdom which is in line with teaching
practices and other elements such as pedagogy,
materials, and curriculum. PCK is divided into two
parts namely Content Knowledge (CK) and
Pedagogical Knowledge (PK). Content knowledge
(CK) is related to subject matter, while Pedagogical
knowledge (PK) is related to educational processes
and practices.
Generally, PCK focuses on teacher’s abilities to
create effective and meaningful learning process. In
other words, learning must be well-designed, fun in
approach and strategies, and adapted to the
characteristics of students. In other words, learning
should be well designed using certain approaches,
strategies or principles, and materials that are
customized to student’s characteristics.
SSP is a medium for pouring ideas and organizing
steps on how learning should be conducted
effectively. SSP which includes all learning
components is designed to assist teachers in teaching-
learning process. The components used are adopted
ICLI 2018 - 2nd International Conference on Learning Innovation
236