Platonic mimesis, which is closer to image,
imagination and imitation. Mythos is a concept of
order, which makes it possible to view literary works
as structured wholes. Praxis refers to already
structured events or chains of events, which can be
perceived as meaningful and answering a purpose.
(Arne, 1995) Artists do not imitate reality or nature,
but represent nature or reality. According to this view,
mimesis is a picture of what is possible, so the work
of art can also be unrealistic. Based on the works of
Neo-Platonist Plotinos, the artworks do not imitate
reality, but rather imitate the pure form of a form or
idea. Here, the artwork has seen parallel to the
products that made by artisan’s orphenomena natural
itself.
Plato stressed that the beauty of the work of art
lies in the form or idea expressed by the artist through
the raw material. Artists can do this because the ideal
form world provides a pure idea of art and beauty,
passing through his mind during the creative process.
Plato considers the idea that man possesses something
that is perfect and unchangeable. Idea is the ideal
world found in humans. Idea by man can only be
known through ratio, it is impossible to be seen or
touched with the five senses. Idea for Plato is fixed or
unchangeable, for example the idea of a triangular
shape, it is only one but can be transformed in the
form of triangles made of wood with more than
number one. The idea of the triangle cannot change,
but the triangle made of wood can change.
Plato's view had gained resistance from Aristotle,
a pioneer of Plato's opposition to mimesis, which also
opposed Plato's low view of art. If Plato thinks that
art only humiliates humans for appealing to passions
and emotions, he considers art as something that can
raise the mind. When aristotle saw art as katharsis,
purification of the soul. Artwork by Aristotle was
causing concern and compassion to free from low
desire audience. Aristotle considers artists and writers
who do mimesis not merely trace the reality, but a
creative process to produce novelty. Artists and
writers produce a new form of the sensory reality it
gains. In his book Poetica (Luxemberg, 1986),
Aristotle argues that literature is not a copy (as Plato
describes) but an expression of "universalia" (general
concepts). From the self-effacing reality of an artist
or poet chooses several elements to be re-created into
“the eternal human nature”, universal truth. That is
makes Aristotle strongly argue that artists and writers
are much more powerful than carpenters and other
craftsmen. According to Plato, the world is divided
into three worlds of ideas, the physical world, and
artwork (Bertens, 1979). The world of ideas is the
source of all forms/ ideas (true).
The world we live in today is the physical world.
The physical world is the imitation of the world of
ideas. The point is everything we have saw,
everything we have hold, something we think
beautiful, ugly, or other that exists in this physical
world is a replica of the true form that is in the world
of ideas. According to Plato, before our spirit
descends from the world of ideas and blends with our
bodies in this physical world, our spirits are
introduced with many concepts. Given this thought
means in the physical world there is no such thing as
originality. In Aristotle's book Poetic, all types of
poems (epic poet, tragedy, comedy), or even flute
games are imitations. And he divides the imitation
into three namely means, object, and manner
(Bertens, 1979). (a) “Means” which means ways of
rhythm, language (dialogue, voice of person), and
harmony. Aristotle exemplifies, the art of rhyme is
only imitation of the language, does not involve
harmony. (b) Object means to imitate from human
nature (character). Aristotle argues that human
character in general is two that virtue and vice
(goodness and evil). (c) Manner means the
presentation of a character. A player or actor acts/
pretends to be a character he plays in a story, good or
evil. An actor performs, represents imitation of the
nature/ character of the real life.
2 METHOD
Visual analysis of Braille painting by Niken Larasati
is qualitative, so it needs a process of reading,
understanding, and practice in accordance with the
basic concepts and rules that exist in qualitative
research. “Qualitative is research naturalistic or
natural research, ethnography, symbolic
interactionism, inward perspective,
ethnomethodology, phenomenology, case studies,
interpretive, ecological, and descriptive.” (Moleong,
2010) Qualitative research seeks to build a view of
the object under study in detail through explanations
by essays, holistic, and complex images. Qualitative
methods consist of observation, interview, or
document review. This method is used because of
several considerations (1) adjusting qualitative
methods more easily when faced with plural reality;
(2) this method presents directly the nature of the
relationship between the researcher and the
respondent; (3), this method is more sensitive and
more adaptable to much sharpening of the shared
effect on the value patterns encountered.
Qualitative research aims to understand the
phenomenon or text that occurs in the object of
Visual Analysis of Niken Larasati’s Braille Painting: A Mimesis Studies
253