Elementary School Student’s Multiple Intelligence in Mathematical
Problem Solving
Hanim Faizah
Mathematics Education Department, University of PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya, Jl. Ngagel Dadi IIIB/37, Surabaya
Keywords: Multiple Intelligence, Problem Solving, Elementary School’s Student.
Abstract: The characteristics of the students is very diverse, one of which is intelligence. There are eight kinds of
intelligence, namely 1) linguistic intelligence, 2) mathematical intelligence, 3) visual-spatial intelligence, 4)
kinesthetic intelligence, 5) musical intelligence, 6) naturalist intelligence, 7) interpersonal intelligence, and 8)
Intrapersonal intelligence. Based on the theory that Gardner has revealed, human intelligence is not single.
So multiple intelligences of the students’ needs to be analyzed through the way of problem solving done by
students. The aim of this research was to describe the multiple intelligences of elementary school students in
solving mathematical problems. The object of this research is the students of grade V MI Hasanuddin
Gedangan-Sidoarjo. The research was a qualitative descriptive research because of the data obtained is data
in the form of descriptive sentences and visual images. Implementation of this research is done in 5 stages,
that is initial phase include literature study and empiric study, test preparation phase, main stage giving
question to student, data analysis phase, and reporting stage. From the research that has been conducted, it is
known that the dominant multiple intelligences in the students influence the way students think in solving
math problems.
1 INTRODUCTION
Anita E. Woolfolk (in Joseph, 2006: 106) suggests
that according to the previous theories, the
intelligence includes three definitions, namely (1) the
ability to learn; (2) the overall knowledge gained; and
(3) the ability to adapt successfully to the situation or
the environment in general. The intelligence of the
students themselves is not only single but covers
various fields. According to Gardner (2011), there are
eight kinds of intelligence, 1) linguistic intelligence,
2) mathematical intelligence, 3) visual-spatial
intelligence, 4) kinesthetic intelligence, 5) musical
intelligence, 6) naturalist intelligence, 7)
interpersonal intelligence, and 8) Intrapersonal
intelligence. Schmidt (2003: 32) argues that
intelligence is a collection of pieces of ability that
exist in different parts of the brain. According to him,
all these pieces are interconnected, but do not work
independently. And most importantly this piece is not
static or determined since someone was born.
Intelligence can develop throughout origin is fostered
and improved. This opinion is almost similar to the
opinion of Armstrong (2003: 1) that the most
important thing for us is to realize and develop all
kinds of human intelligence and combinations.
Ariany, et. All (2017) said that the lecturer needs to
know the dominant intelligence in the students, so
that the lecturer can plan the learning which is
relevant to the students’ intelligence. Willis and
Johnson (2001) stated that teachers’ strategies may
vary from establishing specific times of direct
instruction using various methods to setting up
multiple-intelligence centers or stations that students
visit at flexible times throughout the day. Although
all children will benefit from experiences with all
intelligences, teachers can encourage students to
“learn” on their strengths to achieve mathematical
understanding.
The characteristics of multiple intelligences in
mathematics will be explained in detail.
1. Verbal-Linguistic Intelligence: According to
Munro (1994), students with verbal-linguistic
intelligence will feel easy to convert numerical
data into verbal data. they can think better through
discussion, argument, and verbal explanation.
2. Logical-Mathematical Intelligence: Logical-
mathematical intelligence is concerned with the
ability to process numbers and/or skills using
314
Faizah, H.
Elementary School Student’s Multiple Intelligence in Mathematical Problem Solving.
DOI: 10.5220/0008521303140318
In Proceedings of the International Conference on Mathematics and Islam (ICMIs 2018), pages 314-318
ISBN: 978-989-758-407-7
Copyright
c
2020 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved
logic such as: interested in manipulating the
environment and tend to prefer a trial-and-error
strategy, relatively fast in counting activities, likes
to count, and likes strategy games like games
Javanese chess, tends to easily accept and
understand the explanation of cause and effect.
3. Visual-Spatial Intelligence: Visual-spatial
intelligence is concerned with the ability to
accurately capture color, direction, and space and
to change its capture into other forms such as
decoration, painting, painting, sculpture. A person
with visual-spatial intelligence can imagine
things, giving birth to ideas visually and spatially
(in the form of images or visible forms of the eye)
(Armstrong, 1996). According to Supit (2003: 39)
people with visual-spatial intelligence can
estimate the distance and existence of himself
with an object.
4. Kinesthetic Intelligence: The student with this
intelligence, can think easily through body
movement, for example he can understand the
graph by moving his finger through the graph, he
will do some movement to understand something.
(Munro, 1994)
5. Musical Intelligence: Musical intelligence deals
with the ability to capture sounds, differentiate,
compose, and express themselves through
rhythmic, rhythmic sounds or voices, and tapping
objects to the table at the time of writing or
drawing. They tend to enjoy playing musical
instruments or even playing music with unused
objects.
6. Naturalist Intelligence: Naturalist intelligence
relates to the proficiency in recognizing and
classifying flora and fauna in their environment.
This intelligence also relates to one's love of
natural objects, animals, and plants. Naturalist
intelligence also characterized by sensitivity to
natural forms, such as leaves, clouds, rocks.
7. Interpersonal Intelligence: This intelligence
involves many skills, namely the ability to
empathize with others, the ability to organize a
group of people toward a common goal, the ability
to recognize and read other people's thoughts, the
ability to make friends or establish contacts
(Armstrong 1993: 11, 2002: 21-22). Interpersonal
intelligence is built on the core ability to recognize
differences, especially major differences in mood,
temperament, motivation, and intention (Gardner
1993: 23).
8. Intrapersonal Intelligence: Intrapersonal
intelligence deals with the internal aspects of a
person, such as, the feelings of life, the range of
emotions, the ability to distinguish emotions,
mark them, and use them to understand and guide
their own behavior (Gardner 1993: 24-25).
According to Wardhani (2010: 39), mathematics
problems can be distinguished in two types, namely:
1) Routine problems, it can be solved by following
procedures that may have been studied. Routine
problems are often referred to as the problem of
translators because the description of the situation can
be translated from words into symbols. 2) Non-
routine problems lead to process problems, requiring
more than simply translating problems into
mathematical sentences and the use of known
procedures. Non-routine issues require solving the
problem by creating their own troubleshooting
methods. Based on Aldover (2018), mathematical
problem solving is a performance assessment test that
requires judging a student’s overall performance on a
problem, making it more complex than simply
marking an answer right or wrong.
In every type of the intelligences, students have
their own way to solve the problem. Therefore, Cheng
(2017) said that normal-school mathematics students
should give the answers to mathematical problems
through independent thinking and extensive reading
of literature, improve the process of solution through
team discussion, and turn MPSA internal force into
mathematical literacy through the problem
explaining. According Polya (1973: 222-224) step in
solving the problem are: 1) Understanding the
problem (understanding the problem) 2) Planning a
plan (devising a plan) 3) Carry out the calculation
(carry out a plan) 4) Re-examining the process and
results (looking back at the completed solution).
The important of multiple intelligence in solving
mathematics problems was known from the result of
the research done by Eissa and Mostafa (2013). It was
investigated the effect of using differentiated
instruction by integrating multiple intelligences and
learning styles on solving problems, achievement in
and attitudes towards math in six graders with
learning disabilities in cooperative groups. From this
research, it is known that differentiated instruction by
integrating multiple intelligences and learning styles
on solving problems , achievement in, and attitudes
towards math in the target students was effective.
Another study aims to investigate the relationship
between Gardner’s theory about multiple intelligence
and mathematics learning was done by Niroo, et. al.
(2012). The result of the study was indicated that in
the case of pre-test, there exists a significant
relationship between the mathematical intelligence
and students’ mathematical functioning in general
and in levels of application and reasoning; however,
in the level of knowing there does not exit such
Elementary School Student’s Multiple Intelligence in Mathematical Problem Solving
315
relation. The research done by Ariany, et. Al. (2017)
reported that every student has a dominant
intelligence, interpersonal intelligence is the
dominant intelligence that most students have from
the eight types of intelligence in multiple
intelligences. The implications of this study are that
students become aware of their dominant intelligence
so that they are more confident. So, according to the
result of recent study about multiple intelligence, it is
important to identify student’s multiple intelligence
to determine the effective method of teaching that can
facilitate student with diverse intelligence to learn in
the class.
2 RESEARCH METHOD
The research was a qualitative descriptive research
because of the data obtained were descriptive
sentences. This research was conducted in 5th grade
students of MI Hasanuddin Tebel-Gedangan-Sidoarjo
in the academic year 2015/2016. The steps of this
research were as follows:
2.1. The initial phase of the study was literature
studies and empirical studies. The study of this
literature was conducted to obtain various
theories about multiple intelligences. While the
empirical study is to get a description of the
student’s achievement of the students in grade 5
in MI Hasanuddin Tebel, as well as to get a
general overview of the student’s multiple
intelligences. Empirical study was done by
giving a questionnaire to find out the dominant
multiple intelligence of students in grade 5.
2.2. Implementation Phase. The implementation
phase was held in two phases that can be
explained as follows:
a. Compile the problems for mathematics
problem solving test. The problem compiled
has been adjusted to the characteristics of
each intelligence. The next step was expert
validation, this step was aimed to get advice
for the appropriateness of the problems
compiled.
b. The implementation of the research. The
problems that have been compiled will be
given to the subjects to be solved
individually. Then, they will be interviewed
to know the steps to get the test results.
During the students did the test, the
researcher observe the attitude shown by
students.
2.3. Data Analysis
a. Analysis of the data, the researcher
analyzed to know the multiple intelligences
of students who are known from the steps
of student work and it will be compared to
the characteristics of multiple intelligences
that have been obtained from the literature
study and empirical study in the early stages
of the research
b. Make a conclusion.
3 RESULT AND DISCUSSION
At the beginning of the research, all grade 5 students
in MI Hasanuddin were given a questionnaire to find
out the dominant multiple intelligences of each
student. From this test, researcher has known that the
students in the class have not only one intelligence.
But, from the result researcher would find out the
student with dominant intelligence to do the
mathematical problem-solving test. The researcher
selected seven research subjects with different
intelligence then given a mathematical problem-
solving test. After being given a problem-solving test,
the student was interviewed to get the validity of the
test results.
The result and discussion of the research was
explained as follows.
3.1 Verbal-Linguistic Intelligence
Polya
Problem
Solving
Steps
Number of Problem
1
2
3
4
5
Understand
the problem
Very
Good
Very
Good
Very
Good
Very
Good
Very
Good
Devise a plan
Good
Not
good
Good
Very
Good
Good
Carry out the
plan
Very
Good
Not
good
Very
Good
Very
Good
Good
Look back
Good
Not
good
Good
Very
Good
Good
Based on the Polya’s steps, the work of students is
follows:
Students with linguistic intelligence like activities
related to Language. She loves reading or telling
stories. She easier to understand the meaning of the
story given by the researcher. As for the matter of
geometry that contains the image of a plane
combined, he found it difficult.
3.2 Logical-Mathematics
Based on the Polya’s steps, the work of students is
follows:
ICMIs 2018 - International Conference on Mathematics and Islam
316
Polya
Problem
Solving
Steps
Number of Problem
1
3
4
5
Understand
the problem
Very
Good
Very
Good
Very
Good
Very
Good
Devise a plan
Good
Good
Very
Good
Good
Carry out the
plan
Very
Good
Very
Good
Very
Good
Good
Look back
Good
Good
Very
Good
Good
Students with logical-mathematical intelligence
like calculating activity. This student loves
mathematics subjects. Student with logical-
mathematical intelligence, in formulating the
problem, he wrote somethings that were known and
asked from the story in the answer sheet and solve it
well. This student did the test in order and every step
of the answer detailed. Students with logical-
mathematical intelligence cannot write a detailed
explanation of his answer.
3.3 Visual-Spatial Intelligence
Based on the Polya’s steps, the work of students is
follows:
Polya Problem
Solving Steps
Number of Problem
1
2
3
4
5
Understand the
problem
Good
Very
Good
Good
Good
Good
Devise a plan
Good
Very
Good
Very
Good
Not
good
Very
Good
Carry out the plan
Very
Good
Very
Good
Very
Good
Not
good
Very
Good
Look back
Good
Very
Good
Good
Not
good
Very
Good
Students with visual-spatial intelligence tend to
get easier to solve the geometric problem. He likes to
make some illustrations by drawing in the paper about
the problem to understand the meaning of the
problem. As in working on the story problem at
number 1, he understood the purpose of the matter by
drawing the shape of the wheels of the car and the
bicycle wheel, then he finished it in mathematical
form.
3.4 Kinesthetic Intelligence
Based on the Polya’s steps, the work of students is
follows:
Polya Problem
Solving Steps
Number of Problem
1
2
3
4
5
Understand the
problem
Not
good
Good
Not
good
Not
good
Not
good
Devise a plan
Not
good
Good
Not
good
Not
good
Not
good
Carry out the
plan
Not
good
Not
good
Not
good
Not
good
Not
good
Look back
Not
good
Not
good
Good
Good
Good
The favorite activities of kinesthetic students
were physical activities. Students with kinesthetic
intelligence tend to move around, such as moving
their legs and arms, such as tapping their ballpoint
pen on the table, shaking their legs, and like to move
places when they feel bored. When thinking, he tends
to make movements to describe his ideas.
3.5 Musical Intelligence
Based on the Polya’s steps, the work of students is
follows:
Polya
Problem
Solving
Steps
Number of Problem
1
2
3
4
5
Understand
the problem
Not
good
Very
Good
Good
Good
Good
Devise a plan
Not
good
Good
Very
Good
Very
Good
Good
Carry out the
plan
Not
good
Not
good
Very
Good
Very
Good
Not
good
Look back
Not
good
Not
good
Good
Good
Not
good
Musical intelligence tends to influence a person
to play music. In reading the subject he tends to read
it aloud so that he himself can hear his voice. Students
with this intelligence, at the beginning of the test, he
did not solve the problem well because the test is done
in a quiet place. He can work well while working
while singing. Of the five test questions he can only
do two things well. As for the other three questions
he can only understand the problem of the problem,
only when he finds the results, he is not careful or not
check back results.
3.6 Interpersonal Intelligence
Based on the Polya’s steps, the work of students is
follows:
Polya
Problem
Solving
Steps
Number of Problem
1
2
3
4
5
Understand
the problem
Good
Good
Good
Very
Good
-
Devise a plan
Not
good
Not
good
Good
Very
Good
-
Carry out the
plan
Good
Not
good
Very
Good
Very
Good
-
Look back
Not
good
Not
good
Good
Very
Good
-
Students with interpersonal intelligence tend to be
sociable. In solving mathematical problems, he
prefers to work in groups. He likes to work in a
discussion, and he leads the discussion. This student
misinterpreted the number 1 problem as his friend
did. So, the answer is written less true. For question
number 2, he did not finish completely. Based on the
Elementary School Student’s Multiple Intelligence in Mathematical Problem Solving
317
interview, the student said forgot the formula
determines the plane area. At number 3, 4 and 5, can
be done well.
3.7 Intrapersonal Intelligence
Based on the Polya’s steps, the work of students is
follows:
Polya
Problem
Solving Steps
Number of Problem
1
2
3
4
5
Understand
the problem
Not
good
Good
Good
Very
Good
Good
Devise a plan
Not
good
Good
Not
good
Very
Good
Not
good
Carry out the
plan
Not
good
Not
good
Not
good
Very
Good
Not
good
Look back
Not
good
Not
good
Not
good
Good
Not
good
Unlike students with interpersonal intelligence,
students with intrapersonal intelligence tend to be
alone. This student can only solve the problem
number 4. While the other problems are not done
completely or the answers written are direct and
incorrect answers. During the test, the student is also
less active in asking questions, either to the researcher
or to her friends. Researchers judge that he is an
introvert person, so he cannot tell his
feelings/thinking to others well.
4 CONCLUSIONS
Based on Gardner’s Theory, there are eight multiple
intelligences. On this research, the students not only
have single intelligence, but also other intelligence as
their inferior intelligence. Teacher need to identify
student’s intelligence to determine the effective
method of teaching that can facilitate student with
diverse intelligence to learn in the class. It is because
of the intelligence of students influence their way to
solve the problem. Students usually use their
dominant intelligent to achieve their best way to
learn.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
In this article, the author would like to sincere
gratitude to LPPM University of PGRI Adi Buana
Surabaya and all the committees of ICMIs 2018
Mataram, Indonesia.
REFERENCES
Aldover, C. (2018). Determinants of Problem-Solving
Performance: Basis for Mathematical Model
Development. International Journal for Innovation
Education and Research, 6(10), 1-25.
https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.Vol6.Iss10.1138
Armstrong, Thomas. 1996. Multiple Intelligences in the
Classroom. Virginia: Association for Supervision and
Curriculum Development.
________________. 2002. Kinds of Smart. Menemukan
dan Meningkatkan Kecerdasan Anda Berdasarkan
Teori Multiple Intelligence. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka
Utama.
Ariany, Riva L., et. Al. 2017. Categorizing Multiple
Intelligences of Pre-Service Mathematic Teachers. 2nd
International Conference on Sociology Education
(ICSE 2017), pages 735-738 ISBN: 978-989-758-316-
2 published by SCITEPRESS Science and
Technology Publications
Cheng, J. (2017). The Strategies and Approaches for
Cultivating Normal-school Mathematics Students’
Math Problem Solving Ability. International Journal for
Innovation Education and Research, 5(2), 26-31.
Retrieved from
http://www.ijier.net/index.php/ijier/article/view/420
Eissa, Mourad Ali and Mostafa, Amaal Ahmed. 2013.
Integrating multiple intelligences and learning styles on
solving problems, achievement in, and attitudes
towards math in six graders with learning disabilities
in cooperative groups. International Journal l of
Psycho-Educational Sciences, Volume (2) Issue (2).
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED565626.pdf
Gardner, Howard. 1993. Multiple Intelligences: The
Theory in Practice A Reader. New York: Basic Books.
______________. 2011. Frames of Mind: The Theory of
Multiple Intelligences. New York: Basic Book.
Indra-Supit, Milly C., dkk. 2003. Multiple Intelligences:
Mengenali dan Merangsang Potensi Kecerdasan Anak.
Jakarta: Ayahbunda.
Munro, John. 1994. Multiple Intelligences dan
Mathematics Teaching. Paper presented at the Annual
Conference of the Australian Remedial Mathematical
Education Association Melbourne
Niroo, Mohammad; Nejhad, Gholamreza Haji Hossein; and
Haghani, Mohmoud. 2012. The effect of Gardner
theory application on mathematical/logical intelligence
and student’s mathematical functioning relationship.
Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 47 (2012)
2169-2175. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Polya, G. 1973. How to Solve It. Princeton, New Jersey:
Princeton University Press.
Schmidt, Laurel. 2003. Jalan Pintas Menjadi 7 Kali Lebih
Cerdas. Bandung: Mizan Media Utama.
Willis, Jody Kenny and Johnson, Aostre N. 2001. Multiply
using Multiple Intelligence. Article Published by
NCTM: Teaching Children Mathematics.
http://karolyeatts.com/Math/multiplewithmi.pdf
ICMIs 2018 - International Conference on Mathematics and Islam
318