members had to interview the respondents about the
medicinal plants that they commonly use. Then, data
on medicinal plants were summarized in the table and
submitted to the lecturer. Lecturer and students
discussed their findings in the classroom. Every
group members was instructed to find the journal
related to the medicinal herbs in order to identify the
chemical constituents, pharmacological effects, and
their usage. Then, every group chose at least two
medicinal plants which contain resin, tannin and
essential oils. They summarized their finding and
made a powerpoint presentation.
Moreover, the appointed presenter and co-
presenter to present their findings. At the end of the
presentation session, lecturer summarized the topic.
Students were assessed through formative and
summative assessments. The presentation and
assignment were assessed by using a rubric. The
participation and teamwork of every group members
were assessed through a peer assessment rubric.
3 RESULT
The number of students enrolled in Pharmacognosy I
subject in the 2016/2017 Even Semester was 106
students, while in 2017/2018 Even Semester there
were 83 students. Figure 1. shows the comparison of
the distribution of marks between the 2016/2017
Even Semester and 2017/2018 Even Semester.
Figure 1: The comparison of the distribution of marks
between Even 2016/2017 Semester and Even 2017/2018
Semester.
The result shows that in 2017/2018 Even Semester,
70 % of the students enrolled this subject got B grade
and above. None of the students got A and E grades.
Meanwhile, for 2016/2017 Even Semester, 83.9 % of
the students got B- grade and below, and 18.9 % of
students fail this subject.
The mean, lowest and highest marks were also
compared between 2016/2017 Even Semester and
2017/2018 Even Semester. Table 1. shows the
comparison of mean, lowest and highest marks
between both semesters.
Table 1: The comparison of mean, lowest, highest marks
between 2016/2017 EVEN Semester and 2017/2018
EVENSemester.
The result shows in 2017/2018 Even Semester, the
mean increase to 72.3 compares to the previous
semester which was 61.7. The lowest marks increase
to 59 compares to the previous semester which was
only 15.
4 CONCLUSION
In collaborative learning method, there are five
important elements, namely positive
interdependence, face-to-face interaction, individual
accountability, social skills, and group processing.
(4). Positive interdependence was done through
individual assignment and group assignments. The
group assignments are summarized from individual
tasks. The students’ performances are quite good,
because all the students carried out their tasks and
submitted them according to the specified period. The
success of group performance is a reflection of the
individual contribution to the group (Johnson and
Smith, 1991). group members should actively help,
encourage each other and divide the task individually
to create positive interdependence (Johnson and
Smith, 1991; Johnson, 1993; Kagan, 1992). In the
learning of this Pharmacognosy I subject, the
implementation of Collaborative Learning method
shows to be effective in improving the final grade, the
mean marks, and the lowest marks. According to
several studies, collaborative learning produces
positive learning outcomes from several subjects such
as statistics, sociology, political science and also
when applied in large classes (Caulfield and Persell,
2006; Goerge, 1994; McKinney, 1993). Collaborative
learning has proven to be more effective than
traditional methods which are categorized as high and
average attainments. However, 2 factors influence the
0
6
28
36
22
5
4
0 0 0
3,8
2,8
4,7 4,7
29,2
26,4
9,4
0,0
15,1
3,8
A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- D E
PERCENTAGE OF STUDENT'S
MARKS
Sem 2017/2018 Sem 2016/2017
Implementation of Collaborative Learning in Pharmacognosy Lesson
87