The Implementation of Collaborative Learning in Pharmacognosy
Lessons
Suryati S.
and Elidahanum Husni
Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Andalas, Padang, Indonesia
Keywords: Collaborative Learning, Pharmacognosy Lesson.
Abstract: Collaborative learning is an active learning method commonly applied in higher education. The objective of
this study is to investigate the effects of collaborative learning on fourth-semester students’ understanding of
Pharmacognosy lessons. A total of 83 students participated in this study. The students' performance was
assessed through formative and summative assessments. Formative assessment included assignments,
presentations, peer assessments, and midterm examination. Meanwhile, the summative assessment included
final examination. The finding revealed that students' performance improved in comparison with the previous
semester. The study will benefit lecturers and students to improve teaching and learning practices in a big
classroom.
1 INTRODUCTION
Pharmacognosy I is a compulsory subject for
Bachelor Degree students of Pharmacy study
program which provides knowledge about natural
sources (plants, animals, minerals) used as medicine,
crude drugs: nomenclature, production of crude drug,
carbohydrates; tannins, glycosides; essential oil;
resin, resin combination, fatty oil; alkaloid; including
the crude drug which produces the group of
compound. Every lecturer already has lecture
material in the form of hand-out and power point.
Teaching and learning strategy was the combination
of TCL (Teacher Centered Learning) and group
discussions. The assessment system as stated in the
teaching plan was Midterm Examination and the
Final Examination and group assignments. The
problems that arise is that student's final score, which
only focuses on the final assessment and does not take
into account the on-going assessment (formative
assessment) produces fewer students who score A and
more who score below B-.
Cooperative learning is a learning situation in
which two or more students work to complete a
common task (Siegel, 2005). The characteristics and
strategies in the implementation of collaborative
learning strategies in the classroom include positive
interdependence, face-to-face interaction, individual
accountability, social skills, and group processing.
The social and psychological benefits of cooperative
learning methods have been well documented in the
past few decades (Brufee, 1999; Johnson and
Johnson, 1989; 1991). Therefore, the objective of this
study is to investigate the effects of collaborative
learning on fourth-semester students’ understanding
of Pharmacognosy lessons with regard to their final
gradings.
2 METHODS
2.1 Participants
The participants are 83 students enrolled in
Pharmacognosy I subject.
2.2 Procedure
This research conducted for three months from April
June 2018 consisted of 3 steps; preparation,
implementation, and assessment. The activities were
conducted inside and outside of the classroom. The
research focused on resin, tannin and essential oils
lessons. For the first step, students were divided into
groups consisting of 10 11 members who appointed
a leader. Lecturer instructed students to construct a
list of questions (questionnaire) for interviewing
respondents. For the second step, every group
86
S., S. and Husni, E.
Implementation of Collaborative Learning in Pharmacognosy Lesson.
DOI: 10.5220/0008680100860088
In Improving Educational Quality Toward International Standard (ICED-QA 2018), pages 86-88
ISBN: 978-989-758-392-6
Copyright
c
2019 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved
members had to interview the respondents about the
medicinal plants that they commonly use. Then, data
on medicinal plants were summarized in the table and
submitted to the lecturer. Lecturer and students
discussed their findings in the classroom. Every
group members was instructed to find the journal
related to the medicinal herbs in order to identify the
chemical constituents, pharmacological effects, and
their usage. Then, every group chose at least two
medicinal plants which contain resin, tannin and
essential oils. They summarized their finding and
made a powerpoint presentation.
Moreover, the appointed presenter and co-
presenter to present their findings. At the end of the
presentation session, lecturer summarized the topic.
Students were assessed through formative and
summative assessments. The presentation and
assignment were assessed by using a rubric. The
participation and teamwork of every group members
were assessed through a peer assessment rubric.
3 RESULT
The number of students enrolled in Pharmacognosy I
subject in the 2016/2017 Even Semester was 106
students, while in 2017/2018 Even Semester there
were 83 students. Figure 1. shows the comparison of
the distribution of marks between the 2016/2017
Even Semester and 2017/2018 Even Semester.
Figure 1: The comparison of the distribution of marks
between Even 2016/2017 Semester and Even 2017/2018
Semester.
The result shows that in 2017/2018 Even Semester,
70 % of the students enrolled this subject got B grade
and above. None of the students got A and E grades.
Meanwhile, for 2016/2017 Even Semester, 83.9 % of
the students got B- grade and below, and 18.9 % of
students fail this subject.
The mean, lowest and highest marks were also
compared between 2016/2017 Even Semester and
2017/2018 Even Semester. Table 1. shows the
comparison of mean, lowest and highest marks
between both semesters.
Table 1: The comparison of mean, lowest, highest marks
between 2016/2017 EVEN Semester and 2017/2018
EVENSemester.
Semester
Marks
Mean ± SD
Lowest
Highest
2016/2017
61.7± 11.96
15
85.5
2017/2018
72.3 ± 5.39
59
82.6
The result shows in 2017/2018 Even Semester, the
mean increase to 72.3 compares to the previous
semester which was 61.7. The lowest marks increase
to 59 compares to the previous semester which was
only 15.
4 CONCLUSION
In collaborative learning method, there are five
important elements, namely positive
interdependence, face-to-face interaction, individual
accountability, social skills, and group processing.
(4). Positive interdependence was done through
individual assignment and group assignments. The
group assignments are summarized from individual
tasks. The students’ performances are quite good,
because all the students carried out their tasks and
submitted them according to the specified period. The
success of group performance is a reflection of the
individual contribution to the group (Johnson and
Smith, 1991). group members should actively help,
encourage each other and divide the task individually
to create positive interdependence (Johnson and
Smith, 1991; Johnson, 1993; Kagan, 1992). In the
learning of this Pharmacognosy I subject, the
implementation of Collaborative Learning method
shows to be effective in improving the final grade, the
mean marks, and the lowest marks. According to
several studies, collaborative learning produces
positive learning outcomes from several subjects such
as statistics, sociology, political science and also
when applied in large classes (Caulfield and Persell,
2006; Goerge, 1994; McKinney, 1993). Collaborative
learning has proven to be more effective than
traditional methods which are categorized as high and
average attainments. However, 2 factors influence the
0
6
28
36
22
5
4
0 0 0
3,8
2,8
4,7 4,7
29,2
26,4
9,4
0,0
15,1
3,8
A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- D E
PERCENTAGE OF STUDENT'S
MARKS
Sem 2017/2018 Sem 2016/2017
Implementation of Collaborative Learning in Pharmacognosy Lesson
87
results, namely the number of respondents, the ability
of teachers (Majoka et.al., 2011).
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The author would like to thank LP3M Universitas
Andalas for the financial support of this research.
REFERENCES
Brufee, K. 1999. Collaborative Learning: Higher
Education, Interdependence and the Authority of
Knowledge. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University
Press.
Caulfield, S. and C. Hodges Persell. 2006. ‘‘Teaching
Social Science Reasoning and Quantitative Literacy:
The Role of Collaborative Groups.’’ Teaching
Sociology 34(1): 3953.
George, P. 1994. ‘‘The Effectiveness of Cooperative
Learning Strategies in Multicultural University
Classrooms.’’ Journal on Excellence in College
Teaching 5(1): 2128.
Johnson, D. W. and R. T. Johnson. 1989. Cooperation and
Competition: Theory and Research. Edina, MN:
Interaction Book Company.
Johnson, D., R. Johnson, and K. Smith. 1991a. Active
Learning: Cooperation in the College Classroom.
Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
Johnson, D. W. 1993. Reaching Out: Interpersonal
Effectiveness and Self-Actualization, 6th ed. Needham
Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon
Kagan, S. 1992. Cooperative Learning. San Juan
Capistrano, CA: Resources For Teachers,Inc.
Majoka, M. I., & Khan, M. S., & Shah, S. (2011).
Effectiveness of Cooperative Learning for Teaching
Social Studies to Different Ability at Elementary
Levels. Retrieved from http://ezpolson.nme.edu;6744/
docview/86357441
McKinney, K., and M. Graham-Buxton. (1993). ‘‘The Use
of Collaborative Learning Groups in the Large Class: Is
It Possible?’’ Teaching Sociology, 21: 403–408.
Siegel, C. (2005). Implementing a research-based model of
cooperative learning. The Journal of Educational
Research. 98 (6).1-15.
ICED-QA 2018 - International Conference On Education Development And Quality Assurance
88