
 
members had to interview the respondents about the 
medicinal plants that they commonly use.  Then, data 
on medicinal plants were summarized in the table and 
submitted  to  the  lecturer.  Lecturer  and  students 
discussed  their  findings  in  the  classroom.  Every 
group  members  was  instructed  to  find  the  journal 
related to the medicinal herbs in order to identify the 
chemical constituents, pharmacological effects,  and 
their  usage.  Then,  every  group  chose  at  least  two 
medicinal  plants  which  contain  resin,  tannin  and 
essential  oils.  They  summarized  their  finding  and 
made a powerpoint presentation. 
Moreover,  the  appointed  presenter  and  co-
presenter to present their findings. At the end of the 
presentation session, lecturer summarized the topic. 
Students  were  assessed  through  formative  and 
summative  assessments.  The  presentation  and 
assignment  were  assessed  by  using  a  rubric.  The 
participation and teamwork of every group members 
were assessed through a peer assessment rubric. 
3  RESULT 
The number of students enrolled in Pharmacognosy I 
subject  in  the  2016/2017  Even  Semester  was  106 
students,  while  in  2017/2018  Even  Semester  there 
were 83 students. Figure 1. shows the comparison of 
the  distribution  of  marks  between  the  2016/2017 
Even Semester and 2017/2018 Even Semester. 
 
 
Figure  1:  The  comparison  of  the  distribution  of  marks 
between Even  2016/2017 Semester  and  Even 2017/2018 
Semester. 
The result shows that in 2017/2018 Even Semester, 
70 % of the students enrolled this subject got B grade 
and above. None of the students got A and E grades. 
Meanwhile, for 2016/2017 Even Semester, 83.9 % of 
the students got B- grade and below, and 18.9 % of 
students fail this subject.  
The  mean, lowest and  highest  marks were  also 
compared  between  2016/2017  Even  Semester  and 
2017/2018  Even  Semester.  Table  1.  shows  the 
comparison  of  mean,  lowest  and  highest  marks 
between both semesters. 
Table 1: The comparison of mean, lowest, highest marks 
between  2016/2017  EVEN  Semester  and  2017/2018 
EVENSemester. 
 
The result shows in 2017/2018 Even Semester, the 
mean  increase  to  72.3  compares  to  the  previous 
semester which was 61.7. The lowest marks increase 
to 59 compares to the previous semester which was 
only 15.  
4  CONCLUSION 
In  collaborative  learning  method,  there  are  five 
important  elements,  namely  positive 
interdependence, face-to-face interaction, individual 
accountability,  social  skills,  and  group  processing. 
(4).  Positive  interdependence  was  done  through 
individual  assignment  and  group  assignments.  The 
group assignments are summarized from individual 
tasks.  The  students’  performances  are  quite  good, 
because all the  students carried  out their  tasks and 
submitted them according to the specified period. The 
success of group performance is a reflection of the 
individual  contribution  to  the  group  (Johnson  and 
Smith, 1991). group members should actively help, 
encourage each other and divide the task individually 
to  create  positive  interdependence  (Johnson  and 
Smith, 1991; Johnson, 1993; Kagan, 1992).  In the 
learning  of  this  Pharmacognosy  I  subject,  the 
implementation  of  Collaborative  Learning  method 
shows to be effective in improving the final grade, the 
mean  marks,  and  the  lowest  marks.  According  to 
several  studies,  collaborative  learning  produces 
positive learning outcomes from several subjects such 
as  statistics,  sociology,  political  science  and  also 
when applied in large classes (Caulfield and Persell, 
2006; Goerge, 1994; McKinney, 1993). Collaborative 
learning  has  proven  to  be  more  effective  than 
traditional methods which are categorized as high and 
average attainments. However, 2 factors influence the 
0
6
28
36
22
5
4
0 0 0
3,8
2,8
4,7 4,7
29,2
26,4
9,4
0,0
15,1
3,8
A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- D E
PERCENTAGE OF  STUDENT'S 
MARKS 
Sem 2017/2018 Sem 2016/2017
Implementation of Collaborative Learning in Pharmacognosy Lesson
87