The study of entrepreneurship in the field of
economics (especially in the western) is relatively
small, particularly in Sukoharjo regency.
Meanwhile, the creative industry of MSME is
expected to compete in the global era, but it
indicates a weakness in synergizing the stakeholders.
Therefore, it is necessary to make serious efforts by
starting the mapping of creative industry of MSME
in Sukoharjo regency and analyzing the related
strategy and regulatory plan.
In general, the creative industry of MSME in
Sukoharjo is divided into three main stages: (1)
mapping of Sukoharjo creative industry on MSME
entrepreneurs, (2) analysis of creative industry on
MSME entrepreneurs’ competitiveness, and (3)
analysis of policy and alternative strategy on
competitiveness increase or its application.
Therefore, the aim of this paper is to examine the
mapping of potential creative industry in Sukoharjo
regency.
2 LITERATURE REVIEW
There are only a few studies in the country that
explain the entrepreneurs' position in the national
economy, in the relationship between finance and
growth, in the contribution, and in the potential to
the economy. However, we can see some research
conducted in other countries as the initial reference.
Research conducted by Global Entrepreneurship
Monitor (GEM) to 42 world countries (including
Indonesia) illustrates the interesting facts that
researcher can follow-up. The results showed that
the rate of entrepreneurship was inversely
proportional to GDP per capita, but the curve form
resembled the letter "U". Countries with a low rate
of GDP per capita (such as Indonesia, Philippines,
Peru, and Colombia) showed a high rate of
entrepreneurship. This condition was the opposite of
middle to high-income countries (such as Japan and
the EU) that showed the low rate of
entrepreneurship. However, the rate of
entrepreneurship countries with high GDP per capita
(such as the United States and Norway) increased
again.
There are several different results from
previously conducted research about
entrepreneurship. Audretsch and Thurik findings
prove that increasing the number of entrepreneurs
can reduce the number of unemployment. They call
this condition as 'Schumpeter effect' by referring to
Schumpeter's theory which states that
entrepreneurship provides a positive effect on
employment. Barringer's findings state that most
start-up companies face many obstacles to survive,
thus most of them experience failure less than 2
years after its establishment. Therefore, a study
related to the differences between those two research
results is necessary to conduct. For the domestic
researchers and policymakers, these differences are a
challenge as the actuality and locality for a domestic
case that needs to be confirmed.
Among the economists, there are two
mainstream views of entrepreneurship in its position,
namely the managed and the entrepreneurial
economy. The managed economy groups believe
that competitive advantage is achieved if the mass
production scale derived from the use of capital and
labor are fulfilled. Solow's theory is also often called
the old paradigm that is very popular during the
industrialization period. Indeed, the major
requirements of large capital and labor are only
found in large-scale and powerful industries, such as
Multinational Corporation (MNC). These groups
believe that the start-up companies and small and
medium-sized enterprises cannot improve the
economy as characterized by Charles Brown: (1)
The inefficiency of production compared to large-
scale companies; (2) Low wages for workers; (3)
Lack of innovation, research and development
(RandD) support in production; The insignificant
role in the economy.
In contrast to the first view, the entrepreneurial
economy groups consider that entrepreneurship
plays an important role in increasing the state
economic output today. Audretsch and Thurik
emphasize the rapid knowledge spillover process of
new and small-to-medium scale business caused by
the power of innovation and creativity. These are
several strong arguments for the second group: (1)
Technology has developed rapidly, thus it is
expected that the production scale required to
achieve economies in the lower scale than before;
(2) Specific market target (niche market) evaluated
stronger can be conducted by new companies or low
scale of companies.
Nevertheless, two arguments above are not
necessarily appropriate to be confronted in a local
context or in a developing country, including
Indonesia. This is due to the differences in the field
and economic structure.