The theoretical framework of this research
explains the relationship between the variables of
library service quality and library usage, library
service quality and library user satisfaction, library
usage and library user satisfaction, and library
service quality and library user satisfaction with
library usage as the intervening variable.
The items used in this study were tailored to the
relevant literature. This research refers to Fatmawati
(2013), with the LibQual + TM version consisting of
several items that make up the LibQual 3
dimensions, such as affect of service (AS), library as
place (LP), and information control (IC). Each item
was given a scale of 1-5, with a higher value
showing there to be a better impression. This
research used the concepts of user satisfaction and
library usage.
Kotler in Fatmawati (2013) stated that service
quality is a form of consumer appraisal. In this
context, the user’s judgment on the level of service
was received at the same time as the expected
service. If the service received was in accordance
with what was expected then it will affect the library
usage. This is in accordance with table 6. Based on
the results of the data processing conducted, we
obtained the result that there was a significant
influence at play between the quality of service and
library usage with a positive direction. The result
was obtained from the hypothesis testing as shown
in the result chapters and analysis. It is known that
service quality (X) has an effect on library usage (Z)
at Airlangga University Library, with the t value for
the service quality variable equal to 2.091, which is
bigger than the t value in table 1, which is 98. It can
be interpreted that H0 was rejected and that H1 was
accepted. It can also be said that the service quality
variable has a significant influence on library usage.
Based on the results of the data processing
conducted, we obtained the results that there is a
significant influence between the quality of service
and the satisfaction of the users. As expressed by
Rowszkowski et.al (2005), quality of service is a
benchmark used to show the satisfaction of the
service recipient. Based on the results of the data
processing, there is a positive influence between the
quality of service and the satisfaction of the user in a
positive direction. The result was obtained from the
hypothesis testing which was done in the results
chapter as part of the integrated analysis. It is known
that service quality (X) has an influence on the
satisfaction of the users (Y) at Airlangga University
Library, with the t value of the service quality
variable being 5.983 times bigger than the t value in
table 1, which was 98. So it can be interpreted that
H0 is rejected and that H2 has a significant influence
on the satisfaction of the users.
Based on the results of the data processing
performed, we obtained the result that there is a
significant influence and relationship between
library usage on the satisfaction of the users in a
positive direction. It is known that library usage (Z)
has an effect on the satisfaction of the visitor (Y) at
the library of Airlangga University with the t value
result for the service quality variable being 4.862
times bigger than the t value in table 1 of 98. It can
be interpreted that H0 is rejected and that we can
accept H3. It can also be said that the library usage
variables have a significant influence on the
satisfaction of the users. Therefore, it can be
interpreted that if the library usage that is
experienced by the readers is good and therefore
higher, then the satisfaction of the users will also be
higher. This is in line with the results of the research
conducted by Moses (2016), stating that library
usage has a significant influence on user satisfaction.
In this study, besides testing the direct effect, we
also tested the indirect effect. The fourth hypothesis
suggests that the quality of service affects the
satisfaction of the visitors through library usage as
the intervening variable at Airlangga University
Library – thus, it is acceptable. An indirect
coefficient value of 0.080 was obtained from
multiplication between the direct influence of
service quality on library usage and from library
usage on the satisfaction of the users. The result of
the coefficient of the indirect effect - if compared
with the results of the coefficient value of direct
influence between the quality of service on the
satisfaction of the users - is equal to 0.490. It thus
can be seen that the direct influence is greater than
the indirect influence. Moses’ research (2016),
which was a reference in this study, resulted in a
direct coefficient of 0.01 and an indirect coefficient
of 0.29. Therefore it can be seen that there are
studies using the intervening library usage variables
resulting in different path coefficients. It is
necessary to consider the indirect effect in decision
making. In addition, if the library has also noticed
the indirect effect, then this will result in the total
influence obtained being the addition of the direct
influence of service (X) variable on the satisfaction
of the user (Y) and the indirect effect of service
quality (X) on satisfaction (Y) with library usage (Z)
as an intervening variable. The result was 0.490 +
0.080 = 0.57.
The Influence of Service Quality on User Satisfaction with Library Usage as the Intervening Variable