Initial Capability Analysis of Productive Teacher and Training
Design Making Learning Module using Flipbook Maker Application
Moch. Musta’in, Arif Rahman and Restu
, Lecturer of UniversitasNegeri Medan, Jl. WilliemIskandarPasar V, Medan, Indonesia
Keywords: Initial Capability Analyis, Productive Teacher, Training Design, Learning Module
Abstract: Theaim of this reasearch is to determine the initial ability of productive teachers in making learning
modules using the flipbook maker application and determining the design of training in making learning
modules. This research was carried out at SMK N 2 Binjai. This research is a quantitative descriptive study
and a theoretical study of the training design for productive teachers to make learning modules uses the
Flipbook maker application. The subjects of this study were productive subject teachers at SMK N 2 Binjai.
In the testing phase the initial ability of productive teachers was obtained by the ability of teachers in
making flipbook maker learning modules that is 62.5% in the less category, after that a theoretical study was
carried out to improve the teacher's ability to make modules and decided the training design using academic
supervision of coaching techniques.
1 INTRODUCTION
The report showed by the World Bank (2011: 3)
states that the integrity of teacher is the most
important factor in improving the quality of
education. According to McKinsey in a report
released by the World Bank (2011: 3) it is stated that
the quality of the education system is not always
proportionate with the quality of the teacher.This is
in line with what was revealed by Syaodih in
Mulyasa (2015: 30) that however good a curriculum
is, the results depend on what is done by the teacher
and students in the class.Thus the instructor presents
an important role both in the preparation and
implementation of the curriculum. Based on various
opinions, it can be concluded that teachers are an
important key in improving the quality of education.
The Southeast Asian Teaching Competency
Standard Framework (2010:15) formulates aspects
of the teacher's pedagogical competency includes the
ability to know the contents of the subjects he
teaches, knowing the characteristics of the students
he teaches, knowing how to teach his students and
how to teach them effectively, preparing effective
learning plansand developing learning program
based on textbook, guide book and other learning
material.
Permendiknas No. 16 tahun 2007 about
Competency Standards of Educators and Education
Personnel stated that one of the pedagogic core
competencies of a subject teacher at the SMA / MA /
SMK level is to be able to carry out learning that
educates and utilizes information technology for the
benefit of learning.One of the pedagogic core
competencies is to use learning media and learning
resources that are relevant to the characteristics of
students and subjects that are taught to achieve the
learning objectives as a whole and utilize
information and communication technology in the
learning being taught.
According to the Guidelines for the
Implementation of Teacher Performance Assessment
(2012: 10) characteristics of teacher performance
include the preparation of teaching materials in a
sequential, logical, contextual and up-to-date manner
and selecting learning resources / learning media in
accordance with learning materials and strategies.
Furthermore, according to Sunartini and Triana
(2016: 22-31) there is a significant and positive
relation between pedagogic competence and
performance working of teacher. So it can be
concluded that there is an indirect relationship
between pedagogic competence and the ability of
teachers to make teaching materials.
According to the Directorate General of Quality
Improvement of Educators and Education Personnel
472
Musta’in, M., Rahman, A. and Restu, .
Initial Capability Analysis of Productive Teacher and Training Design Making Learning Module using Flipbook Maker Application.
DOI: 10.5220/0008889204720477
In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Multidisciplinary Research (ICMR 2018) - , pages 472-477
ISBN: 978-989-758-437-4
Copyright
c
2020 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved
(2008: 36) interesting, effective and efficient
learning certainly requires innovative teaching
materials. For that, a professional teacher is
demanded creativity to be able to compile teaching
materials that are innovative, varied, interesting,
contextual and in accordance with the needs of
students.
Based on core competencyindicator of teachers’
pedagogic related to using Communication and
Information Technology for need learning, an
educator must be able to develop learning material
based on information and technology.Providing
standard learning material can realize
masterylearningapproachandstudents are expected to
master the competencies as a whole, according to the
speed of learning.Therefore teaching materials
should be arranged so that students are more active
in learning activities to achieve competence
(Depdiknas, 2008 : 4).
Good teaching materials should always follow
the development of technology, art and the reality of
life in an increasingly globalized society
(Howe,dkk;2009: 397 - 404).
A module is a set of teaching materials that are
presented systematically so that users can learn with
or without a facilitator / teacher. In accordance with
Rosenberg (2001: 29), there is a shift in the learning
process including from classrooms to places that are
not limited and from paper to paperless.
Therefore, the learning modules compiled are
made digitally. Digital learning module is a teaching
program unit that is arranged systematically and
complete manner which is changed into digital form
for learning purposes.With the availability of
teaching materials in the form of digital learning
modules students can reduce the burden of carrying
more than 1 (one) package book.Students can learn
independently easily because the modules are
arranged systematically and completely. Students
can study in a laboratory and in an unlimited place
with a laptop owned. The existence of this digital
learning module can reduce the use of paper so that
it will have a good impact on the environment.
Using innovative teaching materials can also be a
solution to the obstacles faced in learning
(Yamauchi, 2008).Using multimedia in the learning
process allows teachers to integrate text, graphics,
animation, and other media into one package to
provide comprehensive information for their
students to achieve the desired learning goals.
Multimedia allows the demonstration of
complicated processes to be interactive, animations
made on teaching materials can be linked to other
topics that are more naturally related (Crosby and
Stelovsky, 1995: 147-162).Based on previous
research it is stated that using multimedia modules
can help students visualize abstract concepts but
using multimedia modules in schools is still low
(Lee and Kamisah, 2011). One multimedia
application that can be used to create learning
modules is the flipbook maker.
According to Sholeh in Zuriah (2016: 40), there
are many teachers in the school who "stutter" and
experience difficulties when asked to compile their
own teaching materials and use materials made by
others or factory-made in their learning activities.
Daryanto in Zuriah (2016: 40) states that
teachers realize that the teaching materials they use
are often not in accordance with the context and
socio-cultural situation of students. So pedagogic
competence of a teacher is required to be able to
understand the characteristics or abilities possessed
by students through various ways, one of which is
by developing teaching materials.
This could happen because there are several
possibilities: (1) low ability to master ICT to
develop teaching materials; (2) the supervision
carried out by the principal and by the school
supervisor is still not optimal; (3) lack of training in
the making of teaching materials/learning modules.
To help the teacher in dealing with the problems
raised above in improving the teacher's ability to
make learning modules is by conducting academic
supervision. Academic supervision is a series of
activities to help teachers develop their ability to
manage the learning process to achieve learning
goals (Glickman in Sudjana, 2012: 54).
One of the academic supervision activities to
improve the ability of teachers to compile and
develop teaching materials can be done through the
provision of coaching (training / mentoring) to
teachers who have problems or their abilities are still
low (Sudjana, 2012: 108).
2 METHODS
The method of research in this study is
quantitativedescriptive and literature review. Using
quantitativedescriptive method is to provides a
description of the productive teachers’initial ability
to make learning modul using application flipbook
maker. Literature review determines training design
to make learning module using flipbook maker.
The subject of this study was the productive
teachers of education and training at SMK Negeri 2
Binjaiof 10 teachers.The measurement of the
teacher's initial ability using the instrument
Initial Capability Analysis of Productive Teacher and Training Design Making Learning Module using Flipbook Maker Application
473
questionnaire is the ability of teachers to make
learning modules using flipbook maker
application.The aspects assessed to measure the
ability to make learning modules using flipbook
maker applications are as follows: (1) Using module;
(2) originality; (3) Teacher's interest in making
modules; (4) Teachers' knowledge about learning
modules; (5) Teachers’ knowledge about flipbook
maker application;and (6) Teacher coaching.
The design of the training is to use the GROW
coaching model. This action research has the aim to
complement or enhance the ability of participants to
deal with the situation they experience (Greenwood
& Levin, 2007).The Stringer model has a strong
basic framework which is characterized by three
words, namely: look, think and act.
Figure 1:Action cycle of stringer model (Source:
Yaumiand Damopolii, 2014:41)
3 RESULT AND DISCUSSION
Preliminary observations of productive teachers at
SMK Negeri 2 Binjai show that in fact most of the
teachers in the school when teaching still use a
teacher-centered approach where the teacher teaches
using the lecture method.According to Fitriana and
Mulyani (2014: 88), this will certainly make
students tend to get bored faster and as a result of
students only have a lot of knowledge but are not
trained to find knowledge and concepts.Based on the
assessment of the initial observation questionnaire,
that is, before the implementation of academic
supervision of coaching techniques is carried out in
improving the teacher's ability to make learning
modules, it can be explained in the table below:
Table1 1:The results of the initial questionnaire analysis
making of the learning module.
NO Respondent Value
(
%
)
Explanation
1 Res
p
ondent 1 56.25 Ver
y
Low
2 Respondent 2 68.75 Low
3Res
p
ondent3 62.50 Low
4 Respondent 4 56.25 Very Low
5 Respondent 5 62.50 Low
6Res
p
ondent 6 62.50 Low
7Res
p
ondent 7 75.00 Middle
8Res
p
ondent 8 56.25 Ver
y
Low
9 Respondent 9 56.25 Very Low
10 Respondent 10 68.75 Low
From the table above it is found 4 (four)
respondents obtained a score of 56.25; 2 (two)
respondents obtained a score of 68.75; 3 (three)
respondents obtained a score of 62.5 and 1 (one)
respondent got a value of 75. Four respondents
received a score that was categorized as very low;
five respondents received a score that was
categorized as low and 1 respondent obtained a
grade that was categorized as the middle.
Figure 2: Percentage of initial ability.
This shows that the understanding and ability of
respondents in making flipbook maker learning
modules is still lacking. Therefore it can be
concluded that for the respondents' ability to make
learning modules using the flipbook maker
application, all respondents need to be improved.
Efforts that can be made to improve the ability of
teachers to make learning modules using the
flipbook maker application is to carry out academic
supervision. Academic supervision is considered
important to improve teacher performance in the
learning process so that it is expected to improve the
quality of learning. As emphasized by Sergiovanni
(1982) that the practical reflection of teacher
performance in academic supervision is seeing the
real conditions of teacher performance to answer
questions related to the teacher's ability to manage
the learning.
One technique that can be used in conducting
academic supervision is the GROW coaching model.
This is in line with Sergiovanni's statement (2007:
251) that coaching can help development in
0%
20%
40%
60%
Persentage
Persentage
ICMR 2018 - International Conference on Multidisciplinary Research
474
learning.According to Whitmore in Passmore
(2012), coaching can be the key to opening one's
potential to maximize its performance.According to
Thorne (2005) in coaching activity, the role of a
coach is like asking questions for analytical
purposes, using open questions to explore deeper
information, can provide suggestions so that insight
from coachee is more open, offering ideas and
developing them together and providing feedback.
Razakstates that coaching can also help someone
to understand themselves, their own potential and
circumstances so that a coachee can find their own
solutions to their problems. This is because coaching
emphasizes one's own awareness to learn rather than
teach.
Meanwhile, according to Grant in Wilson (2011),
coaching is a collaborative process that focuses on
solutions, result orientation and systematic, where
the coach facilitates the improvement of work
performance, life experience, self-learning, and self-
development. Matthews (2010) states that one of the
keys to the success of a coaching program is the
existence of self-awareness in coachee.
With this awareness, coachee is automatically
motivated to make changes. Furthermore, according
to Seger (2007), coaching if done properly can
improve individual competencies which will lead to
improved performance that is problematic or can
even improve individual performance.
Adey (2004) suggests that more teacher coaching
is carried out in the implementation of teacher
professionalism programs. According to Fischler in
Widodo (2011: 69), through participation in
coaching, the teacher turns out to be more reflective
so there is a desire to improve his teaching
performance. In line with this, Loucks (2010)
includes coaching as one of the important teacher
professional improvement programs in addition to
other methods, such as lesson study, action research,
and monitoring.
Based on the above statements, coaching can be
applied in academic supervision to improve teacher
professionalism in the learning and teaching process,
included in improving the ability of teachers in
making learning modules using flipbook maker
applications.
GROW as one of the models in coaching is very
effective because the steps are very specific so that
they are easily applied directly. (Team FMA, 2013:
27). According to Wilson (2011), GROW coaching
model techniques are able to support intuitive power
and coaching skills.
(Pramudianto, 2015) states that the GROW
coaching model has the goal of solving problems or
goal setting.The role of a coach is to help coachee
identify goals for the problems faced or the goals to
be achieved from Coachee and focus on the solution
of the problem.
In the implementation of coaching, coachee will
be asked to share problems or obstacles experienced
first, then the coach is expected to lead to setting
goals. This initial stage requires that a coach be able
to identify coachee problems properly so that the
process of driving the destination can run according
to what is desired.
Identification of good problems by supervisors
will affect problem-solving abilities. This is in line
with Stein and Book (2004), that understanding
problems / formulating problems until problems can
be identified properly is the first step that must be
done in solving problems. D'Zurilla, Nezu, and
Maydeu-Olivares (2004) state that one aspect of
problem solving is being able to define
problems/formulations.
When formulating a problem, a coach tries to
explain and understand the problem by gathering as
many specific and concrete facts about the problem
as possible, identifying demands, obstacles and
setting realistic problem-solving goals (for example,
changing the situation to be better, accepting the
situation and minimize emotional disturbances). A
coach must have good questioning skills to gather
specific facts and set realistic goals later.
GROW is an abbreviation of four steps or the
process of coaching:
1. Goal is ability to be achieved by trained
people. The goal must be intelligent, so that
everyone can realize when the goal is achieved.
2. Reality is the starting point of the ability of
people who are trained. This stage requires
issues that are happening and also challenges
that must be stated. Furthermore, an assessment
is carried out to assess the extent of the
achievement of people trained with the
objectives to be achieved.
3. Obstacles/Options.The first thing is an obstacle
that will slow down people who are trained to
achieve goals andthis needs to be identified.
Furthermore, these obstacles must be overcome
with several choices as a solution to overcome
these obstacles.
4.
Way Forward. It takes the form of a step
forward to ensure the commitment of the
people who are trained to carry out and execute
the chosen solution. Each step of the GROW
model has a specific and measurable goal.It
will help people who will be trained to be able
to improve their abilities from the initial
Initial Capability Analysis of Productive Teacher and Training Design Making Learning Module using Flipbook Maker Application
475
conditions to the conditions to be achieved.By
going through these processes and steps, there
will be obstacles that arise as well as
alternative solutions that have the potential to
resolve the obstacles that arise. (Team FMA,
2013: 27).
The following will show the specific actions of
each step of the GROW coaching model as follows:
1. The goal step, with the following actions: a)
providing understanding so that the person
who is coached agrees with the topic to be
fostered; b) providing understanding so that
the person being coached agrees with the
specific objectives of the "Goal" step; c)
establish long-term goals if possible.
2. Step reality, with the following actions: a)
inviting people who are coached to conduct
self-assessments related to existing topics and
situations; b) providing examples related to
problems that function as feedback; c)
examining the assumptions that appear to be
validated; d) disposing of irrelevant
assumptions.
3. Step obstacles, with the following actions: a)
identifying obstacles that arise; b) clarifying
back to the person who is coached whether the
obstacles appear to be more than one; c) the
trainer must consider and discuss various
types of people, resources, environment, etc.
4. Steps ofoptions, with the following actions: a)
making sure that all alternative choices have
been identified; b) inviting the person being
coached to give input; c) offering also input to
people who are nurtured carefully; d) making
sure that the person being coached has
determined alternative choices to overcome
obstacles.
5. Way forward steps, with the following
actions: a) making a commitment to
implement alternative choices that have been
chosen; b) re-evaluation of obstacles that
might arise; c) planning the steps in detail
along with the time period needed; d)
providing understanding and agreeing on what
kind of support will be given to people who
are coached. (Team FME, 2013: 29).
4 CONCLUSION
Based on the above description, the following
conclusions can be drawn:
a. Academic supervision is very effective to
improve teacher professional skills and improve
the quality of learning. Academic supervision is
able to create harmonious, democratic,
constructive, and objective human relations that
are carried out continuously.
b. The GROW coaching model is very effective
inacademic supervision. By implementing the
GROW coaching model, a coachee has a strong
motivation to learn or improve his abilities based
on self-awareness and personal responsibility.
REFERENCES
Adey, P., Hewitt, G., Hewitt, J. & Landau, N. 2004.
The Professional Development of Teachers: Practice
and Theory. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic
Publishers.
Bank Dunia, 2011.MentransformasiTenagaPendidikan
Indonesia, Volume 1,
Jakarta: Bank Dunia
Crosby, M. E., &Stelovsky, J., 1995.From multimedia
instruction to multimedia evaluation.Journal of
Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 4 :
147-162.
D’Zurilla, T.J., Nezu, A.M., &Maydeu-Olivares, A.,
2004.What is social problem solving ? Meaning,
models, and measures. In E.C. Chang, T.J. D’Zurilla&
L. Sanna, (Eds.) Social Problem Solving: Theory,
research, and training (pp. 11-27), Washington, DC:
American Psychological Association.
DirektoratTenagaKependidikan., 2008.Media
PembelajarandanSumberBelajar.Jakarta:
DirjenPeningkatanMutu PTK Depdiknas
DirektoratTenagaKependidikan.,2008.PenulisanModul,
Jakarta: DirjenPeningkatanMutu PTK Depdiknas
DirektoratTenagaKependidikan.,
2012.PedomanPelaksanaanPenilaianKinerja
Guru.Jakarta: DirjenPeningkatanMutu PTK
Depdiknas
Fitriana, Itanur.,dkk., 2014.
PeningkatanAktivitasdanHasilBelajarSiswaMelaluiMo
delPembelajaranActivity BasedLearning
BerbantuanFlash
CardDilengkapiLKSPadaMateriIsomer
danReaksiSenyawaHidrokarbonKelasXSMABatik1Sur
akartaTahunPelajaran2012/2013. JurnalPendidikan
Kimia (JPK),(online) Vol. 3 No. 2 Tahun 2014.
Greenwood, D. J. & Levin, M., 2007. Introduction to
action research: Social research for social change.
California: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Howe, E.M., 2009. Henry David Thoreau, Forest
Succession & The Nature of Science : A Method for
Curriculum Development, The American Biology
Teacher71(7): 397-404
Lee, T. T. &Kamisah, O., 2011. Effectiveness of
interactive multimedia module with pedagogical agent
ICMR 2018 - International Conference on Multidisciplinary Research
476
(IMMPA) in the learning of Elechtrochemistry: A
preliminary investigation. Asia-Pasific Forum
onScience Learning and Teaching, 12(2): Article 9
Loucks-Horsley, S., Stiles, K. E., Mundry, S., Love, N.
&Hewson, P.W. 2010. Designing Professional
Development for Teachers of Science and
Mathematics. California: Corwin.
Matthews, J., 2010. Can Line Managers Ever Be Effective
Coaches?, Bussiness Leadership ReviewVII:II. 1-10
Passmore, J., 2010. Exellence in Coaching:
PanduanLengkapMenjadi CoachProfesional, Jakarta.
PPM.
Pramudianto. 2015. I’am A Coach,
StrategiMengembangkanPotensiDiriDenganCoaching.
Yogyakarta.Andi Offset.
Razak, Abdul. -. Coaching dan Mentoring
DalamPendidikan, InstitutAminuddinBaki. Bandar
Enstek.
Rosenberg, M. J., 2001. E-learning: Strategies for
delivering knowledge in the digital age. New York:
McGraw-Hill
SeameoInnotech., 2010. The Southeast Asian Teaching
Competency Standars Framework, Philippine.
SeameoInnotech.
Seger., 2007. Membudayakan CoachingdiTempatKerja.
Diunduh 11 O k t o b e r 2 0 1 7 , h t t p : /
/www.bppk.depkeu.go.id/webpegawai/a t ta c h m e n
ts / 5 9 3 _ ME MBUDAYAKAN % 20 COACHING
% 20 DI % 20T E M P A T % 20 KERJA %
20%20ARTIKEL%20SEGER.pdf.
Sergiovanni,T.J., 1982. Supervision of Teaching.
Alexandria, Association For Supervision And
Curriculum Development
Sergiovanni, Thomas J., 2007. Supervision: A
Redefinition. New York: The McGraw Hill
Companies
Stein, S. J., & Book, H. E., 2004.Ledakan EQ: 15
prinsipdasarkecerdasanemosionalmeraihsukses.
Bandung.Kaifa
Sudjana, H. Nana., 2012.
SupervisiPendidikanKonsepdanAplikasinyaBagiPenga
wasSekolah.Bekasi: Binamitra
SunartinidanTriana.,2016.HubunganAntaraKompetensiPe
dagogik Dan Kinerja Guru Di
KecamatanGirimulyoKabupatenKulonProgo,
Humanika16(1): 22-31
Team FME., 2013. Principles Of Coaching. Coaching
Skills.www.free-management-
ebooks.comTanggalakses 13 Februari 2017.
Thorne, K., 2005.Coaching for change:
Peranpelatihdalamperubahanmanusiadanorganisasi.
(Fiyanti Osman, Penerjemah). Jakarta : PT.
BhuanaIlmuPopuler
Widodo, Ari.,Riandi, Supriyatno.B,
2011.PengembanganPaket Program Coaching
Berbasis Video
UntukMeningkatkanKompetensiMengajar Guru Sains,
CakrawalaPendidikan, Februari 2011, Th. XXX, No. 1
Wilson, C., 2011. Performance Coaching:
MetodeBaruMendongkrakKinerjaKaryawan, Jakarta.
PPM.
Yamauchi, G.L.,2008. Effects of Multimedia Instructional
Material on Students’ Learning and Their
Perceiptions of The I, nstruction,Tesis Iowa State
University
Youmi, Muhammad. &Damopolii, Muljono. 2014. Action
Research. Teori, Model, danAplikasi.
EdisiPertama.Jakarta :KencanaPrenadamedia.
Zuriah, Nurul.,Sunaryo, H., Yusuf, N., 2016. IbM Guru
Dalam Pengembangan BahanAjar Kreatif
InovatifBerbasisPotensiLokal, Jurnal Dedikasi, 13
Initial Capability Analysis of Productive Teacher and Training Design Making Learning Module using Flipbook Maker Application
477