Determinant Factors Affecting the Introduction of Entrepreneurs to
Overcome Intellectual Prevention: A Case Study at Faculties of
Economics of Private Universities in Medan
Tamrin Hasibuan
1
, Azhar Apriandi
2
1
Management Department, Faculty of Economic, UISU, Medan
2
Economic Development Departemen, Faculty of Economic, UISU, Medan
Keywords: Student Entrepreneurship, Determinant Factor, Internal Factor, External Factor, Contextual Factor, and
Entrepreneurial Interest.
Abstract: The background of this research is the lack of graduates who dare to start entrepreneurial activities.
The interest in student entrepreneurship is still lacking. The increase in the number of
undergraduate graduates who are not comparable to the capacity of work available in the company
will become a national problem resulting in many educated unemployed. The world of education,
especially universities, has educated students and prepared graduates to study entrepreneurship and
make entrepreneurship a part of the curriculum offered, but efforts to incorporate entrepreneurship
education into the college curriculum are not always balanced by students' intention to do business.
The purpose of this study is to describe the actual conditions of the determinants that influence
students 'entrepreneurial interests and form a method of approach to increase students'
entrepreneurial interest in overcoming intellectual unemployment. This research will be conducted
at six Private Economics Faculties in Medan City. This study uses a descriptive approach, primary
data obtained from questionnaires of 100 selected respondents. This study concludes that partially
internal factors influence the interests of entrepreneurship a lot, while external and contextual
factors do not affect. Simultaneously the three variables, namely internal, external, and contextual,
have an influence on the interest in entrepreneurship, but the effect is very small, which is only
15.8%, meaning that in general the interests of entrepreneurs are relatively low.
1 INTRODUCTION
Students as youth and the younger generation are the
backbone of national development. The future of the
nation and the ideals of a just and prosperous society
rest on the shoulders of young people. This is
certainly not an easy task; therefore, youth
empowerment needs to be done and must receive
special attention. This can be done by developing
abilities, skills and characters that must be carried out
continuously. Without special attention, the younger
generation might be a burden to the State.
The world of labor competition is increasing
rapidly, and this is inversely proportional to the
availability of employment, which certainly makes
the unemployment rate in Indonesia still high. In
relation to the quality of human resources, education
is considered as a means to improve the quality of
human resources themselves. Good education is
expected to be able to provide good human resources.
But in reality, currently education is also considered
to be closely related to unemployment, especially
educated unemployed workers.
Based on Central Agency data North Sumatra
Statistics (BPS), the unemployment level of college
graduates especially in North Sumatra is still quite
large and dominating. In 2016, it increased 6.22%
from 2015 by 5.34% (BPS, 2016). This means that
university graduates in North Sumatra are the highest
education level contributing 6,22% unemployment.
This number can be a sign that it turns out that
university graduates do not guarantee someone has a
job.
Based on current conditions, the profession as an
entrepreneur seems to be one of the right solutions.
People no longer depend on the work available but
start thinking about how to make it create their own
Hasibuan, T. and Apriandi, A.
Determinant Factors Affecting the Introduction of Entrepreneurs to Overcome Intellectual Prevention: A Case Study at Faculties of Economics of Private Universities in Medan.
DOI: 10.5220/0008892907150722
In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Multidisciplinary Research (ICMR 2018) - , pages 715-722
ISBN: 978-989-758-437-4
Copyright
c
2020 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved
715
jobs. The government also began to intensively
launch the National Entrepreneurship Movement.
The entrepreneurial Student Program was actually
launched by the Director General of Higher
Education of the Ministry of Education and Culture
in 2013.
The Entrepreneurial Student Program (PMW)
which will be implemented and developed by tertiary
and private tertiary institutions aims to provide
knowledge and skills, attitude and entrepreneurship
based on science and technology to students so that
they can change the mindset of job seekers to create
jobs. This program is also expected to reduce the
unemployment rate of college graduates.
Based on the fundamental problem, namely the
lack of student entrepreneurship, the low interest of
students in entrepreneurship, and the lack of
institutional intervention in improving student
entrepreneurship, researchers felt interested in
conducting research entitled "Determinants of
Influencing Entrepreneurial Interest to Overcome
Intellectual Student Unemployment of Faculty of
Economics, in Private Universities in Medan City.
The formulation of problem in this research is
how is the influence of Internal, External, and
Contextual Factors on student entrepreneur interest.
2 METHODOLOGY
2.1 Research Design
The object and scope of this study are external
factors, internal, contextual, and entrepreneurial
interests. The research method used in this research is
explanatory research. Explanatory research method is
a research used to obtain description, description
systematically, factual and accurate about facts,
nature and relationship between variables studied
(Sekaran and Bougie: 2010)
2.2 Variable Operationalization
Internal factors, namely personal skills about the
problem of how we manage ourselves. External
factors, namely social skills related to how we deal
with a relationship, contextual factors, namely
academic support by teaching entrepreneurship
courses taught through education and training, and
interest in Entrepreneurship is an interest in students
in entrepreneurship. The variable operation used is
the Linkert scale.
2.3 Population and Sample
The populations in this study are the Faculty of
Economics students who have obtained courses
entrepreneurship at the Islamic University of North
Sumatra, Muhammadiyah University of North
Sumatra, Muslim Nusantara University, Alwasliyah
University, Sari Mutiara University, Nomensen
University, Darma Agung University, and Methodist
University, with sampling techniques using Slovin
formula and obtained 100 respondents.
2.4 Testing Research Instruments
Testing the research instrument aims to test the
quality of the data whether the items stated in the
questionnaire are adequate and in accordance with
conditions in the field or not. In this study used the
validity test and reliability test.
To find out items that are valid and invalid, it is
done by comparing the value of r count with rtable at
the level of trust 95%, in other words the error rate
tolerated (α) in this study is 5%. If the value of ritung>
rtable then the instrument item is declared valid, and
vice versa if the value of rcount <rtable then the
instrument item is declared invalid, n = 100 then the
r table is obtained 0, 194. In this study, all items in
question are valid because r count> r table.
A variable is said to be reliable or cannot be seen from
the croncbach Alpha r value. If the value of r> 0.60,
the instrument is declared reliable (Imam Ghazali,
2001, p. 42). The reliability test results in this study
show the value of cronbach's alpha> 0.60, so that all
indicators of each variable in the questionnaire are
reliable. It means that all the questionnaires in this
study are reliable questionnaires.
2.5 Data Analysis Technique
The data analysis technique used in this study is
Descriptive Statistics, Multiple Linear Regression
Analysis, Classical Assumption Tests, and
Hypothesis Tests.
2.5.1 Test Descriptive Statistics
The results of the descriptive statistics are shown
below:
ICMR 2018 - International Conference on Multidisciplinary Research
716
Table 1: Test Descriptive Statistics.
N Min Max Mean
Std.
Deviation
Internal 100 42 70 58.38 5.799
external 100 32 57 43.21 6.021
contextual 100 35 68 53.20 6.153
Interest 100 43 65 52.77 4.807
Valid N 100
(listwise)
2.5.2 Description of Variable Interest in
Entrepreneurship (Y)
Data on Entrepreneurial Student Interest variables
were obtained through questionnaires with the
number of respondents 100 students. This variable
uses research indicators, namely interest in
entrepreneurship, independence, social environment,
and a good future with a total of 13 statements.
This study uses a Likert Scale with 5 alternative
answers from strongly agree to strongly disagree.
Data analysis using computer program assistance
shows that the Entrepreneurial Student Interest
variable has the lowest value of 43 and the highest
value of 65; The mean value is 52.77; and the
standard deviation value is obtained at 4,807. The
variable Interest in Entrepreneurship is high.
Table 2: Tendency Categories of Variable Frequency
Student Interest.
No.
Interval Frekw %tase cate
g
or
y
1.
> 47,66
90 90%
Hi
g
h
2.
30,34 s/d
47,66 10 10%
Midle
3.
< 30,34
0 0% Low
Total 100 100%
Based on the calculation of the data tendency of
Entrepreneurial Student Interest, out of 100
respondents, 90% of respondents are in the high
category, 10 respondents in the moderate category
(10%), and no respondents in the low category. These
results indicate that respondents' assessment of the
variable Interest in Entrepreneurship is high.
2.5.3 Description of Internal Factor
Variables (X1)
Data on Internal Factor variables were obtained
through questionnaires with the number of
respondents 100 students. This variable uses research
indicators, namely attitudes and personalities with a
total of 14 statement. This study uses a Likert Scale
with 5 alternative answers from strongly agree to
strongly disagree. Data analysis using computer
program assistance shows that the Internal Factor
variable has the lowest value of 42 and the highest
value of 70; The mean value is 58.38; and the
standard deviation value is obtained at 5.799
Table 3: Frequency Trend Category Internal Factor
Variables.
No.
Interval Frekw %tase
Cate
g
or
y
1. > 51,33 89 89%
Hi
g
h
2.
32,67 s/d
51,33 11 11%
Midle
3. < 32,67 0 0% Low
Total 100 100%
Based on the calculation of the data tendency of
the Internal Factor variable, out of 100 respondents,
90% of respondents are in the high category, 11
respondents in the moderate category (11%), and no
respondents in the low category. These results
indicate that respondents' assessment of the Internal
Factor variable is high.
2.5.4 External Variable Description (X2)
External factor variable data were obtained through
questionnaires with the number of respondents 100
students. This variable uses research indicators,
namely attitudes and personalities with a total of 12
statement. This study uses a Likert Scale with 5
alternative answers from strongly agree to strongly
disagree. Data analysis using computer program
assistance shows that the Internal Factor variable has
the lowest value of 32 and the highest value of 57;
The mean value is 42.21; and the standard deviation
value obtained is 6.021.
Table 4: Frequency Trend Category External Factor
Variables.
No.
Interval Frekw %tase
Category
1. > 44 34 34%
Hi
g
h
2. 28 s/d 44 66 66%
Midle
3. < 28 0 0% Low
Total 100 100%
Determinant Factors Affecting the Introduction of Entrepreneurs to Overcome Intellectual Prevention: A Case Study at Faculties of
Economics of Private Universities in Medan
717
Based on the calculation of the data tendency of
the External Factor variable, out of 100 respondents,
34% of respondents are in the high category, 66% of
respondents in the moderate category, and no
respondents in the low category. These results
indicate that respondents' assessment of the External
Factor variable is moderate.
2.5.5 Contextual Variable Description (X3)
This variable uses research indicators, namely
attitudes and personality with a total of 14 statements.
This study uses a Likert Scale with 5 alternative
answers from strongly agree to strongly disagree.
Data analysis using computer program assistance
shows that the Internal Factor variable has the lowest
value of 35 and the highest value of 68; The mean
value is 53.20; and the standard deviation value is
obtained at 6.153.
Table 5: Frequency Trend Category Variable Contextual
Factor.
No.
Interval Frekw %tase
Cate
g
or
y
1. > 51,33 66 66%
Hi
g
h
2.
32,67 s/d
51,33 34 34%
Midle
3. < 32,67 0 0% Low
Total 100 100%
Based on the calculation of the data tendency of
the Contextual Factor variable, out of 100
respondents, 66% of respondents are in the high
category, 34 respondents in the moderate category
(34%), and no respondents in the low category. These
results indicate that respondents' assessment of the
Contextual Factor variable is high.
2.6 Multiple Linear Regression Test
Data analysis in this study uses multiple linear
regression analysis. Based on the data above, the
following multiple linear regression equations are
obtained:
Y = 32,097 + (0,263) Internal + (0.117) External +
(0.005) Contextual + e (1)
From the results of multiple linear regression, it
can be concluded:
a) 2,097 shows that if the Internal, External, and
Contextual variables are zero (0), the value of
Entrepreneurship Interest is 32,097.
b) 0.263 shows that if the Internal variable is
increased by 100%, the value of
Entrepreneurship Interest increases to 26.3%
c) 0.117 indicates that if the External variable is
increased 100%, the value of Entrepreneurship
Interest increases to 11.7%.
d) 0.005 shows that if the contextual variable is
increased 100%, the value of Entrepreneurship
Interest increases to 0.50%
2.7 Test the Hypothesis Partially
(t-test)
This test is done to test whether the independent
variables (X); Internal, External, and Individual
contextuals have a positive and significant influence
or not on the dependent variable (Y), namely
Entrepreneurship Interest.
The criteria for acceptance/rejection are as follows:
1) If count> t-table, Ho is rejected the meaning is
influential.
2) When calculating <t-table, Ho is accepted which
means there is no effect.
From the results of the t test, it is produced as
follows:
a) Internal factors tcount> t table = 3.078> 1.985
can be concluded that the variable X1 has a
contribution to Y. The value of positive t
indicates that the variable X1 has a relationship
that is in line with Y, and the significance is
0.003 <0.05. It is stated that H1 is accepted and
Ho is rejected at α = 5% which shows that
partially Internal Factors affect the Interests of
Entrepreneurship. The value of the Beta
coefficient standard is 0.317, which explains the
influence of Factors Internal to Entrepreneurial
Interest at 3.17%.
b) External factors tcount <ttable = 1.391 <1.985
can be concluded that the variable X2 does not
have a contribution to Y, and the significance is
0.168> 0.05. This is stated that Ho accepted
means that there is no influence of External
Factors on Entrepreneurship Interest.
c) Contextual factors tcount 0.063 <1.391 can be
concluded that variable X3 does not have
contribution to significance = 0.950> 0.05. This
is stated that Ho meaning has no influence on
the Factors Contextual Entrepreneurship.
2.8 Simultaneous Test (Test F)
This test is conducted to determine whether or not
there is an influence between the independent
ICMR 2018 - International Conference on Multidisciplinary Research
718
variables namely Entrepreneurship Education,
Family Environment, Personality towards the
dependent variable namely Entrepreneurial Interest
used by the F test.
From the results of the analysis, it is known that
the value of Fcount> Ftable is 6.002> 2.699, and the
significant value is 0.001 <0.05. This means that Ho
is rejected. If Ha is accepted, it can be concluded that
Internal Factors, Factors External, and Contextual
Factors significantly influence the Interests of
Entrepreneurship together.
2.9 Determination Coefficient
This test is done to see how big the independent
variable is able to explain dependent variables. Based
on the table above, it is known that the coefficient of
determination (R Square) is equal to 0.158 or 15.8%.
This means that Internal, External, and Contextual
Factors in explaining Entrepreneurial Interest are
15.8%, while the remaining 84, 2% is explained by
other factors which are not included in this study.
3 ANALYSIS
3.1 Analysis of Factor Influencing
Internal against Interest
Entrepreneurship
The results of statistical tests between internal factors
and entrepreneurial interests obtained tcount> t table
are 3.078> 1.985 (sig = 0.003 <0.05) which indicates
that internal factors influence entrepreneurial
interests. Of the 14 questions about internal factors
(attitudes and personality), 93% agreed that students
dare to accept challenges and business opportunities,
they need freedom for example the freedom to use
time, that is, we can determine time flexibly at work
but remain committed to completing tasks and
responsibility at work. This is in line with the
statement from Siswadi (Siswadi, 2013) stating that
freedom in work is a work model where a person does
a little work but gets great results. An entrepreneur
will have free time for himself, not bound by working
hours as employees in the company (points 1-6, 8-
14). 7% answered that neutral/ hesitant would work
with risk as well as the potential for large profits
compared to the risks and potential profits small/
ordinary, meaning that students have not dared to take
risks (point 7).
Kurnianto and Sulistya (Kurnianto and Sulistya,
2012) stated that to be able to develop students'
interest in making a career as an entrepreneur, efforts
are needed to improve their personality factors.
Personality factors include the need for achievement,
locus of control, friendship with uncertainty, and
courage to take risks and confidence. These
personality factors can be nurtured and improved
through the development of their soft skills. In
addition, curriculum improvement, learning and
teaching methods still need to be addressed.
3.2 Effect of External Factors on
Entrepreneurial Interest
From the results of the statistical test between
external factors and entrepreneurial interests, tcount
<ttable is 1.391 <1.985 (sig = 0.168> 0.05) which
indicates that external factors have no effect on
Entrepreneurial interest. Of the 12 questions about
external factors (family and environment social), 8%
of students who answered agreed (point 12) that
students were sure they could manage time well
between matters personal, college/ academic, running
a business and getting along with the environment,
and 92%, answering neutral / showing doubts (point
1-11), because the factor of work of parents still has
a considerable influence, where there are still many
parents who work as employees also expects their
children to work as employees who are considered to
have a lower risk than being entrepreneurs.
Conversely, parents who work as entrepreneurs are
believed to be able to become role models
(entrepreneurial role models) that will shape
children's interest in entrepreneurship in the future
(Galoway, et al., 2006).
3.3 The Effect of Contextual Factors on
Entrepreneurial Interest
From the results of statistical tests between contextual
factors and entrepreneurial interests, tcount <ttable is
0.063 <1.985 (sig = 0.950> 0.05), which indicates
that the contextual factor has no effect towards
Entrepreneurial interest. Of the 14 questions about
factors contextual (Educational support, Experience
and debriefing entrepreneurship), 76% (Points 1-9,
and 11-14) agree that entrepreneurial knowledge and
skills obtained from formal and non-formal education
are important factors for running a business. Besides,
curriculum and learnings which focuss more on
mastering the theory than practical application which
are in synergy with learning methods and facilities at
the Faculty of Economics can optimize the
improvement of student’s abilities/ competencies
which contain knowledge about values, spirit, spirit,
Determinant Factors Affecting the Introduction of Entrepreneurs to Overcome Intellectual Prevention: A Case Study at Faculties of
Economics of Private Universities in Medan
719
attitude, behavior in order to have entrepreneurial
thinking, socialism - economy, in order to be able to
experience entrepreneurship and entrepreneurship
gain empirical experience from previous
entrepreneurs, equip production techniques to get it
produce or produce products in the form of goods,
services or ideas, anticipation techniques for various
possible things in entrepreneurship in the form of
problems, problems and other risks.
University and Faculty facilitate the growth of
entrepreneurship new by providing laboratory,
gallery, program incubators, training, workshops and
the like, allocate internal budget to support
Entrepreneurship courses and the growth of new
entrepreneurs. 24% (point 10) answered neutral /
showing doubt, that curriculum and learning at the
Faculty of Economics are still interested emphasize
mastery of theory compared to the application of
practice, where the lecturer becomes the center
teacher centered learning must be more competent
and skilled in running the Entrepreneurship Course.
The educational approach sees that this condition
occurs because of weak entrepreneurship education in
schools and colleges. Whether viewed from the
aspect of curriculum, instructor, learning process,
learning facilities, sources of learning and evaluation,
the implementation of entrepreneurship education
still has fundamental problems (Rianti, 2003).
3.4 Effects of Internal, External, and
Contextual Factors
From the results of statistical tests between internal,
external, and contextual factors with entrepreneurial
interests obtained Fcount> Ftable = 6,002> 2,699 and
significant value = 0,001 <0,05, it is seen that Internal
Factors, External Factors, and Contextual Factors
significantly influence the Interests of
Entrepreneurship together. Of the 13 questions about
entrepreneurial interest (General attitude towards
entrepreneurial activity, Specific awareness to like
entrepreneurial activities, feeling happy with
entrepreneurial activities, and Entrepreneurial
activities have important meaning for individuals),
100% agree; it means that students have a high
interest if internal, external and contextual factors are
very supportive.
The value of the determination coefficient (R
Square) is 15.8%. It can be said that the interest of
Faculty of Economics students in Medan City for
entrepreneurship is generally relatively low. This is
indicated by the lack of individuals and groups
entrepreneurial students; low student involvement in
training, debriefing, seminars and the like inside and
outside the campus environment; and the lack of a
business proposal submitted/ competed, individual
characteristics, family environment and socio-
demography and academic support are the most
dominant factors determining the high and low
interest of student entrepreneurs. The tendency of
high interest in student entrepreneurship is due to
there is a feeling of being more free, independent and
productive when entrepreneurship; love to work
according to personal intuition; confidence in ability
and self-potential; and the courage to accept
challenges and take risks. The low interest in student
entrepreneurship is because the majority of parents
and families work as civil servants and private
employees so that they direct their children to
continue their careers in the formal sector. Public
perception that social status and welfare guarantees
employees are better than entrepreneurs also make
student entrepreneurial interests low. The climate of
entrepreneurial learning is still dominated by
theoretical aspects and is also one of the factors that
influences the low interest of student entrepreneurs.
Students do not have field orientation and experience
because the learning model is still conventional.
Facilities in the form of physical, capital, and
programs that can be accessed on campus internally
are availabe but relatively limited that it does not
support the student entrepreneurship interest.
Some ways that can be done to increase student
entrepreneurship interests include (a) increasing the
frequency of entrepreneurial practices, socialization
and access to information about entrepreneurship on
campus internally as well as possible to the widest
possible extent. student, (b) implementing periodic
contextual learning in the form of field studies in
Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) in
the campus area, especially those owned and
managed by alumni. (c) providing and completing
entrepreneurial facilities on campus such as
laboratories, galleries, workshops and the like, (d)
holding special programs such as business incubators
and competitions writing business plans for students
(business plans) with certain prizes / bonuses that
have an impact in increasing entrepreneurial interest
and skills, (e) allocating adequate budget to groups of
students who after certain selection meet the
requirements and have prospects for developing
businesses, and (f) building integrated
entrepreneurship development networks with local
stakeholders who have similar programs such as
Dinas Industry and Trade Cooperatives, Bank
Indonesia and the Chamber of Commerce and
Industry in Medan City (Herwin Mopangga: 2014).
ICMR 2018 - International Conference on Multidisciplinary Research
720
4 CONCLUSIONS AND
SUGGESTIONS
4.1 Conclusion
Based on the data analyzed, conclusions can be drawn
as follows:
a) Internal factors influence the interest in
entrepreneurship.
b) External Factors do not affect the Interests of
Entrepreneurship.
c) Contextual factors do not influence the interests
of entrepreneurship.
d) Internal Factors, External Factors, and
Contextual Factors significantly influence the
Interests of Entrepreneurship together.
4.2 Suggestion
From the results of the conclusions above, the
suggestions can be put forward as the following:
a) There needs to be new innovations in
entrepreneurship learning that are more creative
by giving not only theory but also direct practice
in the field for entrepreneurship which makes it
one of the consideration values for
entrepreneurship courses.
b) Parents as the first-place for children to get
education must provide examples and
motivation for children to become entrepreneurs
because the environment family has a positive
effect on the interest in entrepreneurship.
c) Based on the results of this study, internal
factors have a positive and significant effect on
the interest in entrepreneurship so that students
have to change the mindset of job seekers to
become job creators
d) Universities and Faculties must provide
facilities and infrastructure as a place for
students to channel their entrepreneurial
interests.
REFERENCES
Aditya Dion Mahesa, 2012, Analisis Faktor-Faktor
Motivasi Yang Mempengaruhi Minat Berwirausaha
(Studi pada mahasiswa S1 Fakultas Ekonomika dan
Bisnis Universitas Diponegoro Semarang)
diakses dari www. eprints.undip.ac.id
Alma, b. 2009. Kewirausahaan; untuk Mahasiswa dan
Umum (Edisi Revisi). Bandung: Penerbit Alfabeta..
Angki Adi Tama, 2010, Analisis Faktor – Faktor Yang
Memotivasi Mahasiswa Berkeinginan Menjadi
Entrepreneur (Studi pada Mahasiswa S1 Fakultas
Ekonomi Universitas Diponegoro Semarang), skripsi,
diakses dari www. eprints.undip.ac.id
Anonim, 2009, Mengaruh Pembelajaran Kewirausahaan
Terhadap Minat Menjadi Wirausahawan Mahasiswa
Fakultas Ekonomi Jurusan Akuntansi, skripsi,
Universitas Nasional.
Azwar, S, Sikap Manusia Teori dan Aplikasinya, Pustaka
Pelajar, Yogyakarta, 1995.
Bambang Sad Kurnianto and Sulistya Eka Putra, 2012,
Menumbuh Kembangkan Minat Berwirausaha Bagi
Para Mahasiswa Di Lingkungan Perguruan Tinggi,
Prosiding Seminar & Konferensi Nasional Manajemen
Bisnis, 26 Mei 2012.
Ciputra. 2009. Quantum Leap Entrepreneurship;
Mengubah Masa Depan Bangsa dan Masa Depan
Anda (Cetakan ke 4). Jakarta: Elex Media Komputindo.
Eni Cahyani, Novita Sari, 2017. Determinan motivasi
terhadap minat berwirausaha terhadap minat
berwirausaha mahasiETERMINAN MOTIVASI
TERHADAP MINswa pada Perguruan Tinggi swasta
di Sumatera Selatan. Jurnal Ekonomi Manajemen dan
Akuntansi, Sumatera Selatan.
Hisrich, Peters. 2000, Entrepreunership, fourth edition.
New York, USA : Mc Graw Hill inc.
Mopangga Herwin, 2014, Faktor Determinan Minat
Wirausaha FEB Universitas Negeri Gorontalo, Jurnal
Trionomika, Vol. 13, No.1, Juni 2014, ISSN 1411-
514X/ISSN 2355-7737.
Gurbuz, G & Aykol, S. 2008. Entrepreneurial Intentions of
Young Educated Public in Turkey. Journal of Global
Strategic Management, 4(1): 47-56.
Kemendikbud. 2012. Panduan Program Mahasiswa
Wirausaha. Direktorat Pembelajaran dan
Kemahasiswaan, Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan
Tinggi.
Kurnianto, B. S. & Sulistya E. P. 2012. Menumbuh
kembangkan Minat Berwirausaha bagi Mahasiswa
Di Lingkungan Perguruan Tinggi. Prosiding Seminar
& Konferensi Nasional Manajemen Bisnis, (Mei).
Mopangga, H, Faktor Determinan Minat Wirausaha
Mahasiswa, Jurnal F
akultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis
Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
T
r
ikonomik
a,
V
olume
13,
No.
1, Juni 2014,
ISSN
2355-7737.
Muhamad Ikbal, 2011, Pengaruh Motivasi Terhadap
Minat Mahasiswa Akuntansi Untuk Mengikuti
Pendidikan Ppak: Studi Kasus Pada Mahasiswa
Akuntansi Universitas Diponegoro Semarang, skripsi
2011 diakses dari www. eprints.undip.ac.id
Muladi Wibowo, 2011, Pembelajaran Kewirausahaan Dan
Minat Wirausaha Lulusan SMK, Ekplanasi Volume 6
Nomor 2 Edisi September 2011
Mutis, T. (1995), Kewirausahaan yang Berproses, Jakarta:
Grasindo.
Nastiti, Tur., et al. 2010. Minat Berwirausaha Mahasiswa
Indonesia Dan Cina. Jurnal Manajemen dan
Bisnis, 9(2).
Niode, I. Y. 2007. Wirausaha Sebagai Alternatif Solusi
Masalah Pengangguran. Jurnal Inovasi, 4(1): 91-99.
Determinant Factors Affecting the Introduction of Entrepreneurs to Overcome Intellectual Prevention: A Case Study at Faculties of
Economics of Private Universities in Medan
721
Nishanta, B. 2008.
Influence
of Personality Traits and Socio-
demographic Background of Undergraduate Students on
Motivation for Entrepreneurial Career: The Case of
Srilanka. Paper was presented at the Euro- Asia
Management Studies Association (EAMSA)
Conference, Japan.
Rianti, B. P. 2003. Kewirausahaan Dari Sudut Pandang
Psikologi Kepribadian. Jakarta: Penerbit Grasindo.
Sony Heru Priyanto, 2009, Mengembangkan Pendidikan
Kewirausahaan di Masyarakat, Andragogia - Jurnal
PNFI / Volume 1 / No 1 - Nopember 2009.
Susanto, Adi. 2000. Kewirausahaan. Ghalia Indonesia.
Jakarta.
Sugiono (2004), Metode Penelitian Administrasi, Bandung,
Alfabet.
Suryana, 2001, Kewirausahaan, Penerbit Salemba Empat,
Jakarta.
Suherti, L. & Sirine, H. 2011. Faktor-Faktor yang
Berpengaruh Terhadap Niat Kewirausahaan
(Entrepreneurial Intention); Studi Terhadap
Mahasiswa Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana,
Salatiga. Jurnal Manajemen dan Kewirausahaan,
(13)2: 124-134.
Tjahjono,
H. K. & Ardi, H. 2008. Kajian Niat
Mahasiswa Manajemen Universitas
Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta untuk Menjadi
Wirausaha. Jurnal Manajemen dan Bisnis, 16(1):
Yudi Siswadi, Analisis faktor internal, faktor eksternal dan
pembelajaran kewirausahaan yang mempengaruhi
minat mahasiswa dalam berwirausaha. jurnal
manajemen & bisnis vol 13 no. 01 april 2013 issn 1693-
7619.
Yusrita, (2015), Pengantar Kewirausahaan, Penerbit
Ciptapustaka, Medan.
Zain, Z.M., Akram, A.M., & Ghani, E.K. (2010)
Entrepreneurship Intention Among Malaysian Business
Students. Canadian Social Science, Vol 6(3), hal 34-44.
ICMR 2018 - International Conference on Multidisciplinary Research
722