Internalization of the Values of Rasai Cultural Wisdom in Knitting
the Attitude of Tolerance among Social Groups:
A Naturalistic Study on Tabanga Community in Ternate City
Syahril Muhammad
Lecturer of Civic Education Study Program, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education
Khairun University – Ternate
Keywords: Internalization, Cultural wisdom of rasai, Tolerance
Abstract: This study focuses on the assimilation and adaptation processes among social groups with multicultural
basis that characterize Ternate people. It aims at analyzing the assimilation and adaptation processes among
social groups through the internalization of the values of Rasai cultural wisdoms in Tabanga community in
Ternate City; analyzing the inhibiting factors of the internalization of the values of Rasai cultural wisdoms
in knitting the tolerance attitudes among social groups; and analyzing the impacts of Rasai culture of
Tabanga community in Ternate City. The research applied ethnographic approach. The results of the study
show that the assimilation and adaptation processes of Rasai are able to knit the tolerance attitudes among
social groups. The inhibiting factors of the internalization of the values of Rasai cultural wisdoms in
knitting the tolerance attitudes among social groups include the dominance of kinship, the low level of
education achievement of the community, and not yet built a model of multicultural society-based attitude
building in Tabanga community of Ternate City. The attitude of openness of Ternate community in
responding the existence of Rasai culture is strong. In addition, such culture is one of the instruments to
strongly develop a peaceful civilization of the future of North Maluku.
1 INTRODUCTION
One problem that needs attention in the current era
of globalization is the problem of national
integration. The rapid flow of globalization has
resulted in the erosion of a sense of love for local
culture which tends to be weaken. In order to keep
the existence of local culture to remain strong, a
multicultural society needs to be introduced and
instilled a sense of local cultural love. In North
Maluku there is one cultural wisdom known as the
culture of "brother rasai". Rasai's brother culture is
an effort to instill a sense of brotherhood towards
others. Where the brother's culture is built not on
the basis of equality of blood, culture and religion,
but through recognition, appreciation and mutual
agreement between the two parties. This is part of
an effort to minimize the negative impact of the
attitude of acceleration between social groups. The
value of Rasai's cultural wisdom is owned by every
region in North Maluku in its manifestation seen
from brotherhood recognition on the basis of the
trust of the two parties. The religious culture of the
apostles has been formed centuries ago, a long
historical process of the formation of royal
territories in Maloku Kie Raha.
The values of the wisdom of your cultural
culture form a harmonious mutualistic relationship
between diverse tribes, groups, religions and races.
The basis of this mutual recognition of
brotherhood attitudes builds a very high level of
empathy. Therefore they try to treat each other in
the best way even though they are of different
religions and beliefs and tribes. The spirit of this
apostle has been imprinted on them as a fellow
who has been built for hundreds of years. But the
sense of brotherhood remains fostered to this day.
The value of local wisdom that is developed and
believed to be a social glue that is often a reference
in arranging relations between fellow religious
communities. The values of cultural wisdom will
be meaningful for social life if they are used as a
reference and reference material in maintaining
and creating harmonious social relations.
Muhammad, S.
Internalization of the Values of Rasai Cultural Wisdom in Knitting the Attitude of Tolerance among Social Groups: A Naturalistic Study on Tabanga Community in Ternate City.
DOI: 10.5220/0008897200430048
In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Teaching and Learning (ICTL 2018), pages 43-48
ISBN: 978-989-758-439-8
Copyright
c
2020 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved
43
The Ternate community in Sulamadaha and
Tabanga still cared for the cultural tradition of the
"brothers and sisters", even though the two
communities had different religious identities.
These two groups of people have long mingled
together in a cultural order known as the culture of
brother rasai. Where the culture of the apostle is
born from the door of the womb of the tradition of
the Ternate sultanate with the philosophy of "Jou
Se Ngofa Ngare. This philosophy has strong social
cohesion in building open civilization as a social
capital movement in building awareness and trust
in living together without identity turbulence.
The positive contribution from the value of the
local wisdom of the apostle's culture is to creep the
intolerance between social groups in realizing
social resilience (inter-religious tolerance) as part
of the manifestation of the values of local wisdom
in North Maluku. But on the other hand,
indigenous communities at the local level are
confronted with the emergence of the
primordialism and fanaticism between religious,
ethnic and ethnic groups. As a result of a shift in
the values of local wisdom in terms of realizing
social resilience it undermines the culture of
kinship in living together between social
communities.
The main study in this study is related to the
social resilience of the Ternate community through
the penetration of the cultural values of "brother
rasai" inherited from generation to generation. The
Tabanga and Sulamadaha Ternate communities
hold fast to the customs of the Ternate Sultanate by
adopting the philosophy of "Jou Se Ngofa Ngare.
This philosophy is also embraced by the Tabanga
community as part of their view of life that has
long been awakened through the doors of the
Ternate sultanate's hereditary hereditary.
This study focuses on several key issues, namely:
(1) to analyze the process of intermingling and
adaptation between social groups through the
internalization of the cultural values of "brother
rasai" in the Tabanga community in Ternate City,
(2) to analyze the inhibiting factors of
internalization of values cultural wisdom of
"brother rasai" in creeping the intolerance between
social groups and (3) to analyze the cultural impact
of your religion on social integration?
2 THEORITICAL REVIEW
2.1 Intermingling and Adaptation
between Social Groups through
Local Culture
Intermingling between social groups through local
culture as stated by Dadang that there is a positive
correlation of local culture (brother rasai) creates
open social relations. This happens because the
value of local wisdom is interpreted by different
groups of social backgrounds born of trust through
the historical flow of the early birth of civilization
and the traditions of kingdoms in North Maluku.
The cultural wisdom values of "brother rasai" have
meaning if they remain a reference in overcoming
every dynamic of social life. This is in line with
the opinion of De Vos G & Ross Roeanucci L (in
Syafrudin, 2015) proposed a theoretical framework
that the intermingling between groups of people
with different social status can eliminate the
characteristics of group and personal identity. This
means that relationships between tribes, religions,
languages and nations in a pluralistic society can
eliminate the cultural boundaries of ethnic groups.
Cultural characteristics of a particular social group
including ethnic groups may dissolve into the
dominant culture that is used as a reference frame
for the community concerned. This opinion differs
from Barth's empirical research on the nature of a
culture, stating that cultural boundaries can survive
even though tribes mingle. Inter-ethnic differences
are not determined by the absence of assimilation,
contact and exchange of information, but are more
likely to be caused by the existence of a social
process of separation and unification. Differences
in categories can still be maintained despite the
exchange of roles and membership among ethnic
units in one's journey.
2.2 Inhibiting Factors in Internalization
of Local Cultural Wisdom Values
The internationalization process of the value of
local wisdom is done through activities that are
local by means of habituation, learning and
coaching. The values of local wisdom found in the
community include religious attitudes, kinship,
confidence and courage. The benefits of the rasai
culture are as a means of strengthening friendship,
increasing a sense of pride in regional culture,
active in the process of social activities, a means of
self-actualization. The inhibiting factor of
ICTL 2018 - The 1st International Conference on Teaching and Learning
44
internalization of the value of local cultural
wisdom, according to Nasotion (2009) is the lack
of public awareness in maintaining the value of
local wisdom, lack of supporting infrastructure. In
addition, according to Dadang (2015) there are
several aspects of internalization of the values of
local cultural wisdom, including (1) the still strong
dominance of ancestral traditions, (2) the still low
level of public education achievement and (3) the
lack of a multicultural-based community attitude
formation model.
2.3 Impact of Brother Rasai Culture on
Social Integration
Rasai's brother culture is a culture of Ternate
people that can only function well if it is
interpreted properly as it is by the adherents. As a
cultural system, understanding of the culture of the
brotherhood has an impact on the implementation
of the forms of your culture in the life of the local
community.
The meaning of your culture is identical to the
meaning of truth and good living together based on
the history of Ternate society. Truth and goodness
for the local community are expressed through
behavior that is not contrary to the customs of your
culture, the rasai as part of the social tradition is
interpreted as a culture that contains truth.
Cultural wealth such as the brother's culture
can function to create social integration in the
Ternate community. Ralp Linton, social integration
is a process of progressive development in order to
realize perfect conformity together to realize
universal conformity. While Kotoyo defined social
integration as an illustration of the intermingling of
citizens into a whole and unified entity into a
single social unit.
Based on the above opinion, it can be seen that
social integration emphasizes the process of
community development, the intermingling of
different citizens, adjustments between the
different elements of society, until finally reaching
a unity or unity of society. In other words,
intergaration as a process and outcome of social
life is a tool that aims to establish a normal
homogeneous state, if the homogeneity is achieved
then the survival of the community will be
achieved. This is in line with the opinion of
Dadang (2015) that "The values of local wisdom
are meaningful to social life when they become
references and reference material in maintaining
and creating harmonious social relations".
Starting from this opinion it appears that there
is a positive correlation of local wisdom creating
open social relations between social groups even
though they differ in identity. The value of local
wisdom is thus interpreted as a community group
that has different social backgrounds as social
capital born of mutual trust. Koentjaraningrat
(1998) said that kinship is one of the fundamental
principles for grouping each person into social
groups, roles, categories, and differences. This
opinion suggests that the culture of kinship is still
quite strong in the community. The kinship bond
creates a stronger duty among related people than
among strangers. Therefore, a cultural value
system usually serves as the highest guideline for
human behavior.
3 RESEARCH METHODS
This study applies an ethnographic approach with
naturalistic qualitative study methods. Crewell
(1998) said qualitative research is a research
process to understand based on the tradition of
research methodologies that investigate social or
human problems. Researchers create complex
images that are holistic, analyze words, report
views of informants in detail and conduct research
in natural settings.
The source of information for this research is
the cultural observer, community leaders and
traditional leaders, chosen because they can
provide sufficiently accurate information. Which is
the key informant in this study is the researcher
himself (Millan, 2001). The collection of data and
information in this study was obtained through
observation techniques, in-depth interviews,
literature studies and documentation studies.
4 RESEARCH RESULT
4.1 Intermingling and Adaptation
between Social Groups through
Local Culture
The development of the Ternate community from
the beginning, had a view in tradition and culture
inherited from generation to generation from the
door of the womb of the sultanate had a fairly
strong value of social glue. The door to the womb
referred to in this concept is the values of the
wisdom of the cultural life of a common life that
Internalization of the Values of Rasai Cultural Wisdom in Knitting the Attitude of Tolerance among Social Groups: A Naturalistic Study on
Tabanga Community in Ternate City
45
existed from the beginning where the Ternate
community was formed.
In its development, the wisdom of this kinship
culture was given by the Ternate people in the
social dimension known as the culture of "brother
rasai". This culture was practiced by Ternate
people from the past until now. This is in line with
the opinion obtained by the informants that "the
values of cultural wisdom" brother rasai "have
been practiced between communities through an
open agreement (open consensus). From the
agreement each community carries the
responsibility and consistency to develop kinship
attitudes as social capital. Besides that, other
informants also said that "the values of the wisdom
of your culture can be developed by people who
have different socio-cultural and religious
backgrounds. The culture of your church has been
believed by the community as a social glue that is
often a reference in arranging relationships and
intolerance among fellow religious people. This
can be strengthened by the opinion of Dadang
(2015) saying that "The values of local wisdom
will be meaningful for social life if it can be a
reference and reference material in maintaining
and creating harmonious social relations".
Starting from the empirical facts and opinions
disguised by Dadang it appears, that there is a
positive correlation of local culture (brother rasai)
creating open social relations between social
groups despite different identities. This happens
because the value of local wisdom is interpreted by
different groups of social backgrounds as social
capital born from shared beliefs through the
historical process of the early birth of civilization
and the traditions of kingdoms in North Maluku.
The cultural wisdom values of "brother rasai" will
have meaning if they remain a reference in
overcoming any dynamics of social life in
addressing various differences that are vulnerable
to conflict.
The culture of "apostasy" was born along with
the occurrence of social interaction which was
marked by the process of meeting between groups
based on similarities in the area but different in
cultural and religious spaces. From the perspective
of local culture, interactions occur between
different social groups that process according to
the spirit and outlook on life held by each group as
a consensus on living together. This is in line with
the findings of the study that "the process of
assimilation and adaptation of social groups begins
with cooperation and mutual cooperation in
meeting the needs of living together, which is
known as the culture of" Babari "by the Ternate
people. From this babari culture, communication
and interaction are open to members of the local
kinship group known as the "brother of Rasai"
culture.
The findings above, in line with the opinion of
Blum (2012) say that "the process of assimilation
of traditional beliefs contains a large amount of
empirical data related to phenomena, processes and
history of changes in the social environment so that
it has implications for the attitudes and behavior of
community members by promoting mutual trust" .
This means that traditional beliefs are seen as local
cultural wisdom (indigenous knowledge), and are a
source of empirical information and important
knowledge for the community. The same thing
with Brown (2002) "the wisdom of fraternal
culture is a collection of knowledge of ways of
thinking that are rooted in the culture of an
ethnicity, which is the result of a long period of
encounter.
From the opinion of Brown and the findings above,
if they are integrated, it seems a generalization that
"social resilience and intolerance between social
groups are realized, when local cultural values
become a view of life for society. Besides that, the
formation of social resilience is also determined by
consensus and collective agreements based on
social relations born from the process of meeting
between members of social groups.
4.1 Inhibiting Factors Internalization of
Brother Rasai's Cultural Wisdom
Value
Based on the findings indicate that the inhibiting
factors of the culture of the apostle in creeping the
intolerance between social groups in the Tabanga
Ternate community are several aspects including
(1) the still strong dominance of the ancestral
family tradition, (2) the low level of public
education achievement and (3) not the
establishment of a multicultural-based community
attitude development model.
The kinship tradition is a common feature of
Indonesian society which is one of the factors
which clogs the intolerance movement between
social groups. This is in accordance with the
opinion of Koentjaraningrat (1998), that the
tradition of kinship is part of the pattern of life of a
society. Where kinship is one of the fundamental
principles for grouping each person into social
groups, roles, categories, and differences. Family
relationships can be presented in real terms
ICTL 2018 - The 1st International Conference on Teaching and Learning
46
(mother, brother, grandfather) or abstractly
according to kinship level. This opinion in
accordance with the findings of the field provides
evidence that the culture of kinship is still quite
strong among the Ternate community, because
their views are still overwhelmed by the spirit of
homogeneous closeness from aspects of culture,
religion, ethnicity, ethnicity and language. This
happens because kinship ties create obligations
among related people that are stronger than among
strangers.
Education is a very powerful factor to change
people from their views which captures that social
integration can be formed through understanding
and awareness of the importance of living together
even in social differences. Education influences the
behavior of the community in the management of
the social system that includes the cultural and
traditional systems that apply in society. This is in
accordance with the results of the interviews
obtained which stated that awareness of living
together can be determined by the acceptance of
cultural values shared by the community. This is in
line with the opinion of Smith (2000) that human
behavior exists that can not be directly seen and
there are those that can be directly seen from the
outside. Behavior that cannot be directly seen from
the outside is called closed behavior. Thinking and
imagining are examples of closed behavior. While
behavior that can be directly seen from the outside
is called open behavior. This open behavior is a
behavior that appears from the outside as a
manifestation of the interaction of a person or
individual based on a sufficient level of knowledge
and understanding of social life.
For the people of Ternate in crawling social
life based on the culture of "Jou Se Ngofa Ngare"
as a model and pattern of personality coaching
through the formation of multi-ethnic villages such
as Tabanga village, Chinese village, Sarani village,
Arab village, Jawa Fala, Makassar village,
Koloncucu and Tabam. Settlement patterns like
this as a social capital and cultural capital formed
through the historical ties of the Ternate sultanate
in the past. This is part of social practices that have
long blended the seeds of living together and
together in the spirit of mori moi ngone future. The
meaning is different but still one. This is in line
with Gidden's opinion (Azumardi, 2016) by
proposing the Theory of Structuring ". This theory
sees the relationship between actors (actions) and
structures in the form of dualistic relations. This
dualism occurs in "repeated social practices and
patterned across space and time". Social practice
can be in the form of habits or traditions that take
place in society. This opinion can be interpreted
that cultural value orientation among the
community is part of the consequences of the
dynamics of community culture. Elements of
community culture and tradition need to be
preserved, such as devotion, loyalty and propriety.
From this view it can be interpreted that cultural
wisdom has the power and coherence in creating
social stability in creeping peace and civilization
towards civil society. Through these cultural
spaces created social traditions that trust each other
between cultural supporters by reflecting an open
attitude, in the sense of mutually reinforcing even
though they are different in religion, language,
ethnicity and culture. This social climate can be
practiced by Ternate people in relation to fellow
brothers and sisters as part of their group. This
means that the culture of the apostle is as a model
and pattern of community life in creeping social
integration and intolerance between religious
communities. This view is in line with Philpott
(2003) that tradition and culture give a mosaic of
the character of Indonesian society's life ". This
view is reinforced by the opinion of Geertz (in
Ahimsa, 2015) that a community with a culture
and tradition system that has binding power can be
a source of behavioral reference for the community
supporting culture and tradition itself. Both of
these opinions are directly proportional to the
social practices that took place in the Tabanga
Ternate community. This means that the cultural
wisdom system of your church has a charmer
strong enough to build a diverse tradition between
social groups in the future. Where a system of
cultural wisdom like this is a strong foundation for
sustaining a social building of community
communities based on differences in religion,
ethnicity, ethnicity and language. The fascination
of your culture is as part of the effort to support
social building and intolerance between social
groups, both at the local level at the regional and
national levels.
5 CONCLUSION
The process of intermingling and adaptation
between social groups through the internalization
of the values of cultural wisdom "brother rasai" in
the Tabanga community in the city of Ternate can
bind the intolerance attitude between social groups.
From the perspective of local culture, interaction
occurs between different social groups, the process
Internalization of the Values of Rasai Cultural Wisdom in Knitting the Attitude of Tolerance among Social Groups: A Naturalistic Study on
Tabanga Community in Ternate City
47
according to the spirit and outlook on life held by
each group as a consensus on living together. This
can be seen from the realization of mutual
cooperation and cooperation between social
groups, both between religious communities and
between ethnic groups and ethnic groups in the
Tabanga community in Ternate City.
Inhibiting factors of internalizing the values of
cultural wisdom "brother rasai" in binding the
intolerance between social groups is remaining the
strong dominance of kinship traditions in the
descent and the still low level of achievement of
public education and the not yet built model of
multicultural-based community attitude formation.
The behavior of accepting the values of
multicultural culture can be directly proportional to
the achievement of the level of public education.
This means that the better the level of public
education is, the better the community's
understanding of the values of multicultural culture
prevailing in society. On the contrary, the lower
the level of achievement of public education can
hamper the process of internalizing the cultural
values of living together.
The impact of brother rasai culture on the race
against social integration between social groups in
the Tabanga community can be seen from the
strong attitude of the openness of the Ternate
community in responding to the existence of
brother rasais culture. This is also one of the
strongest instruments for building a civilization of
the future peace of North Maluku.
REFERENCES
Andaya Leonard Y. 1989. “Cultural State Formation
Eastern Indonesia”.Southeast Asia in The Early
Modern Era .London: Cornell University Press.
Bendix, Reinhard 1967. Tradition and Moderdity
Reconsidered”. Comparative Studies on Society and
History.
Creswell, John W. 1998. Research Design Qualitative &
Quantitaive Approaches. London: SAGE
Publications.
Guba, Egon G & Yvonna S. Lincoln. (1985).
Naturalistic Inquiry. London: Sage Publication.
Gafur, A.G 2005. Memahami Kultur Maluku Utara
Nilai Identitas Bangsa, (Editor) Sukardi Syamsudin.
Ternate: HPMT.
Koentjaraningrat,1985. Kebudayaan Mentalitas dan
Pembangunan. Jakarta:Gramedia.
Soelarto, B. 1980. Tradisi Ternate dan Sekitarnya.
Jakarta:Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan RI.
Grendler M.E.B. 2012. Belajar dan Membelajarkan,
Raja Wali, Jakarta.
Ahimsa-Putra, H.S. 2001, Strukturalisme Levi-Strauss
Mitos dan Karya Sastra. Yogjakarta: Galang
Press.
Heddy Shri Ahimsa Putra, 2015. Budaya Bangsa, Jati
Diri Dan Integrasi Nasional: Sebuah Toeri. Jurnal
Sejarah dan Nilai Budaya. Jejak Nusantara.
James, I. Gibson, 2012. Urganisasi Perilaku,
Struktur, Proses, edisi 8, Binarupa Aksara,
Jakarta.
Smith, Ronald, 2011. Pschology, The Frontier and
Behavior, Harper and Row, New York.
ICTL 2018 - The 1st International Conference on Teaching and Learning
48