Productive Learning Activities as an Effort to Improve Mathematics
Learning Outcomes of the Circumference of a Circle and Area of the
Circles Material using Jigsaw Cooperative Learning at Students of
SDN 38 Ternate
Sahrin Karim
1
, Sarjuga
1
, Yahya Hairun
2
1
Mathematics Teacher at Elementary School of SDN 38 Ternate, Maluku Utara
2
Mathematics Lecturer at the Faculty of Teacher Training and Educational, Universitas Khairun, Ternate, Maluku
Utara
Keywords: Learning activities, Learning outcomes of mathematics, Jigsaw model.
Abstract: This research is a classroom action research that aims to determine the learning activities of students in
mathematics learning and mathematics learning outcomes in the circumference and area of the circle by
using Jigsaw cooperative learning. The subjects used as respondents were 44 students in the 6th grade of
SDN 38 Ternate city. The instruments used were learning videos and Student Evaluation Sheets (LES). The
results obtained from learning activities observed through learning videos that are analyzed in full are stated
that students are very responsive and active between students and students in groups and students as a whole
so that it can be said to be very good learning activities. While the learning outcomes obtained through the
LES score with an average score are 90 with very good categories.
1 INTRODUCTION
Objectives of the assignment of lecturers at PDS
schools that underlie this Classroom Action research
article is to produce collaborative learning tools
which include learning models as collaboration to
support quality learning objectives in the classroom,
then to reflect on the goals of the PDS can be
coupled with a class action research (PTK). Thus
collaborative learning and quality learning tools are
presented and coupled with classroom action
research (CAR).
Achieving the goal of PDS is the role of students
in the learning process in the classroom. The role of
students as a real activity in the learning process
both in group activities and inter-group activities in
learning will greatly determine the results that will
be obtained in learning. The selection of models also
greatly supports the motivation and enthusiasm of
students to learn. One of the models used is the
Jigsaw cooperative model, with circumference and
circular area material. Thus the topic of classroom
action research (PTK) is "Productive learning
activities as an effort to improve mathematics
learning outcomes in the circumference and area of
the circle using Jigsaw type cooperative learning by
students of SDN 38 Ternate city".
1.1 Problem Formulation
The problem formulations or research questions in
this CAR are:
1. What are the learning activities of the students of
SDN 38 Ternate City on the circumference and
area of the circle by using Jigsaw co-operative
learning?
2. What are the learning outcomes of students of
SDN 38 Ternate City on the circumference and
area of the circle using Jigsaw cooperative
learning?
1.2 Research Objectives
The objectives to be achieved in this study are:
1. To find out the learning activities of students of
SDN 38 Kota Ternate on the circumference and
area of the circle by using Jigsaw cooperative
learning.
2. To find out the learning outcomes of students of
SDN 38 Kota Ternate on the circumference and
Karim, S., , S. and Hairun, Y.
Productive Learning Activities as an Effort to Improve Mathematics Learning Outcomes of the Circumference of a Circle and Area of the Circles Material using Jigsaw Cooperative Learning
at Students of SDN 38 Ternate.
DOI: 10.5220/0008901303030306
In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Teaching and Learning (ICTL 2018), pages 303-306
ISBN: 978-989-758-439-8
Copyright
c
2020 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved
303
area of the circle by using Jigsaw cooperative
learning.
1.3 Research Benefits
This study is expected to be useful for: Principals,
Teachers, Lecturers and Parents as input on learning
outcomes and learning activities of students in 6th
grade of SDN 38 Ternate City.
2 LITERATURE REVIEW
Learning and teaching activities are the processes
carried out by teachers and students when learning
takes place and productive learning activities will
produce good learning outcomes. Herman (2002:
10), that every teaching and learning process always
produces learning outcomes. The problem faced is to
what level of learning outcomes have been achieved.
According to Zain Aqib (2013: 65), learning
outcomes are when someone has learned and there
will be behavioral changes in that person. For
example, not knowing being aware and not
understanding being understanding.
The learning process is a psychic / mental
activity that takes place in active interaction with the
environment which produces changes that are
relatively constant and traceable. This behavior
change is a learning outcome that covers the
cognitive, effective domain, and psychomotor
domains (Uzlifatul Janna 2010: 4). The principle
underlying the assessment of learning outcomes is to
provide hope for students and teachers to be able to
improve the quality of learning. Quality in the sense
of students becomes effective learning and the
teacher becomes a good motivator.
Jhon M. Keller as quoted by Mulyono
Abdurrahman (2002: 46) holds that: learning is
strongly influenced by two kinds of input, namely
personal input groups (personal inputs) and input
groups that come from the environment
(environmental inputs). Another opinion expressed
by Muslims in the Journal of Research in the field of
education mentions the factors that influence
learning, namely:
Learning strategies, one of the strategies that can
increase student involvement in the learning process
are: pre-learning, information presentation, student
participation, evaluation, and action go on.
Students' cognitive style, habit of acting that is
relatively fixed in receiving, thinking, solving
problems, or in information. From various
descriptions of the factors that influence learning can
be grouped into two, namely internal factors and
external factors. Internal factors are factors that arise
from within the students while external factors are
factors caused by external stimulation of students so
that students are affected or conditioned by these
external factors.
2.1 Cooperative Learning Model of
Jigsaw
Cooperative refers to the learning model in which
students work together in small groups helping each
other in learning. Most involve students in groups
consisting of 4 (four) students who have different
abilities.
Lukman (2009: 26) states that the basic elements
of cooperative learning are as follows:
a. Students are responsible for everything in the
group as their own.
b. Students try to see that all members in the group
have the same goal.
c. Students must share the same tasks and
responsibilities where members of the group.
d. Students will be subject to an evaluation or gift /
award which will also be applied to all group
members.
e. Students will be asked to account individually
for the material handled in the cooperative group.
f. Students are various leaders and they need skills
to learn together during the learning process.
2.2 Steps of the Jigsaw Cooperative
Learning Model
The steps of the Jigsaw cooperative learning model
are as follows:
a. Students are grouped with 4-5 people
b. Each person in the team is given different tasks
and assignments
c. Members of different teams with the same
assignments form groups new (expert group)
d. After the expert group discussed, each member
returned to the original group and explained to
the group members about the sub-section they
mastered.
e. Each expert team presented the results of the
discussion.
Discussion of the
Covering
ICTL 2018 - The 1st International Conference on Teaching and Learning
304
2.3 The Material of the Circumference of
a Circle and Area of the Circles
2.3.1 The Circumference of a Circle
The formula of the circumference of a circle K with
diameter d or radius r is as follows:
K = πd atau K=2πr
To facilitate calculation, in using= 3.14 or 22/7,
you can pay attention to the diameter or radius of the
circle. If the diameter or radius of the circle is a
multiple of 7, then use π=22/7. If the value of the
diameter or radius of the circle is not a multiple of 7,
then use π=3.14.
2.3.2 Area of Circle
After studying the circumference of the circle, in this
section we will study the area of the circle. The area
of the circle is the area of the area bounded by the
circumference of the circle. Pay attention to the
following picture.
A circle is divided into 16 jays. Then the juring
is arranged like a rectangle above. The build has a
length equal to half the circumference of the circle
(1/2 πd or πr). The wake width is equal to the radius
of the circle (r). So that the area of a circle with
radius r is equal to the area of a rectangle with a
length of πr and r. Obtained:
L=length x width
L=πr x r
L=πr^2, or because r =1/2 d, thus =πr^2=π(1/2 d
x 1/2 d) = π(1/4 d^2)=1/4 πd^2
So, the area of a circle with radius r or diameter d is
as follows:
L=πr^2, or L=1/4 πd^2
3 RESEARCH METHOD
This research is a classroom action research with
respondents or subjects are students of SDN 38
Ternate City, in total of 40 students. The research
instrument used was the LES (Student Evaluation
sheet) with the number of items as many as 4 (four
items). The item used is the item in the reference
book (not homemade) so that the level of validity
and reliability can be guaranteed. In addition to LES,
observation instruments and video documentation
are used to measure activity during learning.
Observation instruments to answer the first problem
and LES to answer the second problem. The
variables are student learning outcomes on the
material area and circumference of the circle taught
by Jigsaw cooperative learning. The analysis used is
Benchmark Reference Assessment (PAP) Nana
Sudjana (2008: 107)
Minimum completeness standard (SKM) of
mathematics subjects at SDN 38 is 75.
4 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
4.1 Research Results
The results of the video analysis showed that all
groups of students consisting of 4 (four) groups were
all very active in taking lessons and were directly
involved in the learning process carried out with the
Jigsaw type learning model. Thus the results of the
analysis said that the activities of students in the 6th
grade of SDN 38 in 2018 at the time of learning with
traveling material and area of the circle observed by
students as a whole play an active role in classroom
learning.
Evaluation results through the student evaluation
sheet (LES) obtained scores of students learning
outcomes of students in the 6th of SDN 38 Ternate
City in 2018 when learning the Roving and Area of
Circle material using Jigsaw cooperative learning
gained an average score of 90.
4.2 Discussion
Based on the results of the study above, it can be
explained as follows:
Student learning activities observed through the full
video analysis observation instrument obtained
information that all students in the sixth grade of
Ternate City Elementary School in 2018 played an
active and learning role in the circumference and
area of the circle using Jigsaw cooperative learning.
Thus it can be stated that the learning activities of
students in the sixth grade of SDN Kota Ternate are
very good.
Productive Learning Activities as an Effort to Improve Mathematics Learning Outcomes of the Circumference of a Circle and Area of the
Circles Material using Jigsaw Cooperative Learning at Students of SDN 38 Ternate
305
The results of the evaluation score based on the
student evaluation sheet (LES) obtained an average
score was 90. Thus it can be stated that the learning
outcomes of students in the sixth grade of SDN 38
Kota Ternate were very good.
Based on the results of observations made by the
analysis of the whole learning video obtained by the
learning activities of students in the sixth grade of
SDN Kota Ternate was very good and the learning
outcomes obtained through evaluating the learning
outcomes of student evaluation sheets (LES) were
very good. This shows that the activities carried out
in the learning process in class with the results
obtained are balanced, meaning that the suitability
between observations and learning outcomes.
5 CONCLUSIONS AND
SUGGESTIONS
5.1 Conclusions
The conclusions of this Classroom Action Research
are as follows:
Learning activities of the sixth grade students of
SDN 38 Kota Ternate, when learning about the
Roving and Area Circle material using the Jigsaw
type learning model is very good.
The learning outcomes of the sixth grade students of
SDN 38 Kota Ternate, when learning about the
Roving and Area Circle material using the Jigsaw
type learning model was very good.
5.2 Suggestions
Variation in teaching using various strategies and
models can create motivation and enthusiasm for
learning so that it needs to be done when megajar in
class.
CAR is one of the studies conducted in the study
room which is a condition created by a teacher with
the aim of improving learning outcomes is a good
effort that needs to be done to measure student
learning completeness.
REFERENCES
Abdurrahman. 2002. Pendidikan Anak Berkesulitan
Belajar. Accessed 2 October 2015 at
uny.ac.id/default/files/tmp/materi untuk diklat dinas
dikpora DIY.pdf.
Abdu Ahmadi. 2001. Psikologi Belajar [Learning
Psychology]. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta, 2001.
Eka Zuliana. 2010. Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas
VIII MTS Kudus Melalui Model Kooperatif Tipe
Jigsaw Pembelajaran kelas VIII SMP 4 Semarang.
Unpublished Thesis. UNNES.
Herman. 2002. Pembelajaran Kontekstual Terhadap Hasil
Belajar Siswa pada Mata Pelajaran Matematika di
Sekolah Dasar. Unpublished Thesis. Universitas
Pendidikan Indonesia.
Kartono. 2000. Bimbingan Belajar di SMA dan Perguruan
Tinggi. Jakarta: CV. Rajawali.
Nana Sudjana. 2008. Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar
Mengajar. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Slavin. 1995. Kooperatif Belajar Penelitian Teori dan
Praktek. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.
Uzlifatul Jannah. 2010. Upaya Meningkatkan Kemampuan
Komunikasi Matematika Siswa Melalui Model
Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Jigsaw Pada Materi
Fungsi Komposisi Kelas XI MAN Kendal.
Unpublished Thesis.
Zainal Aqib. 2013. Model-model Media dan Strategi
Pembelajaran Kontekstual (Inovatis). Bandung: CV
Yramawidya.
ICTL 2018 - The 1st International Conference on Teaching and Learning
306