Third, team / group building skills, these skills are
manifested in the act of accommodating people's
opinions, cooperating, helping each other, paying
attention to each other. Fourth, skills to solve
problems, self-control, empathy, thinking about
others, obeying agreements, finding a way out by
discussing, respecting different opinions.
Bellack and Hersen (in Gilbert et al. 1991: 67)
describe 5 dimensions of social skills. This
dimension is considered as a unit that can provide an
overview of an individual's ability to express his
feelings both verbally and non-verbally so that
others can respond when social interactions occur.
The 5 dimensions are:
1. Influence Dimension, which is a dimension that
describes an individual's ability to influence or
apply persuasion tactics effectively so that
others are affected by them.
2. Communication Dimension, which is a
dimension to measure an individual's ability to
communicate by listening openly and sending
messages that can convince others.
3. Conflict Management Dimension, which is a
dimension that describes an individual's ability
to manage conflict by negotiating and
identifying potential conflicts to be resolved
openly with the principle of 'all wins'.
4. Leadership Dimension, which is a dimension
that shows an individual's ability to lead by
inspiring, motivating and guiding individuals
toward the right goal.
5. Dimension of Change Catalyst, which is a
dimension that describes an individual's ability
to act as a catalyst for change by initiating and
managing change to make others aware of the
need for change and removal of obstacles.
2.2 Sociodrama
Sociodrama is also often referred to as role playing.
Sagala (2009, p. 213) defines sociodrama as a
method of teaching in which students get the task of
the teacher to dramatize a social citation that
contains a problem so that students can solve
problems that arise from social situations.
Ahmad and Supriyono (2004: 123) state that
sociodrama is a way that provides opportunities for
students to dramatize someone's attitudes, behavior
or appreciation as practiced in everyday social
relationships in society. The definition proposed by
Ahmad and Supriyono is slightly different from the
emphasis from Sagala. Sagala strongly emphasizes
two things, namely the existence of social conflict
and ends with solutions that can be thought of by
students, while Ahmad and Supriyono do not
emphasize these two things. For Ahmad and
Supriyono, sociodrama is only limited to the
realization of the realities of everyday life, both in
joy and sorrow.
The purpose of using sociodrama according to
Abu Ahmad & Widodo Supriyono (2004, p.123) is:
(1) Describing how someone or several people face
social situations; (2) How to describe how to solve a
social problem; (3) Grow and develop a critical
attitude towards behavior that must or should not be
taken in certain social situations; (4) Providing
experience or appreciation of certain situations; (5)
Providing opportunities to review social situations
from various perspectives.
Sudjana (2005: 85) describes the steps of
implementing sociodrama, including: (1)
Determining social problems that attract students'
attention to be discussed; (2) Tell the class about the
contents of the problems in the context of the story;
(3) Establish students who can or who are willing to
play their role in front of the class. Determine social
problems that attract students' attention to be
discussed first. (4) Explain to the audience about
their role when sociodrama is taking place, (5) Give
the perpetrators the opportunity to negotiate a few
minutes before they play a role, (6) End sociodrama
when the situation of the talks reaches tension. (7)
end sociodramas with class discussion to jointly
solve the problems of the sociodrama, (8) Assess the
results of the sociodrama as further consideration.
Not much different, Romlah (cited in Hayuni &
Fluerentine) stated that the steps for implementing
sociodrama are: (1) preparation, (2) making
sociodrama scenarios, (3) determining the group of
players, (4) determining the audience group, (5 )
sociodrama implementation, (6) evaluation and
discussion, (7) game replay if needed.
The difference in the steps in carrying out the
Sudjana and Romlah sociodrama lies in two things.
First, Romlah emphasized the division of groups
between the audience and the player group, while
Sudjana did not see the division of the group as
important because it could work according to class
conditions. For Sudjana, at the initial stage that
needs to be prepared carefully is the selection of
problems that will be played by students. Secondly,
Romlah also added the evaluation and discussion
steps in step 6. This step will evaluate the overall
drama performed, whether it is correct or not, while
Sudjana does not provide this step. Sudjana actually
displays drama only reaching the level of conflict
that occurs and determines the solution is not a
group of players, but discussed together.
Based on the theorical framework above that we
can synthesis the steps of sociodrama
implementation are (1) Determine groups; (2)
Establish social conflicts that attract students'
attention to be discussed; (3) Tell the class about the
content of social conflict in the context of the story;