Working Performance Management Organisation in
order to find the role model for good eselon III
career staff that will receive promotion in open
selection.
Next, from the previous study conducted in 2014
which is promotion time of eselon I, it selects best
three candidates from 11 candidates. The result of
governor choosing was already predicted by
commoners that the chosen people will be those who
has same perspective within the governor itself. In
2015, the 4 positions are competed over 58
candidates of the eselon II, ther is disoriented event
that creates apprehension among people of eselon
III, they were disappointed as none of their member
were chosen during the selection. Thus, it creates
trust issue over Human Resource Working
Performance Management organisation.
In 2016, the two positions for eselon II level, the
winners were professionals that come from internal
institution, the trust grow among public as they are
starting to place hope in open selection program. In
2017, the selection result in 3 best people from 38
candidates who are professionals and come from
internal institutions, the trust were growing among
public as they trust the open selection program
commenced by Human Resource Working
Performance Management organisation.
Furthermore, In 2017, from 7 opened position for
eselon II level, there are only five chosen
professionals, the two places were empty as none of
them are qualified enough to reach the passing grade
provided by the committee. That is why, the re-
selection event was held in that time. the event
shows the lack of professionals among the
candidates, it was strengthen by the fact that the
other five position were earned from externals. From
the explanations above, the research questions of the
study will be, as follow: (1) the public opinion
toward civil apparatus; (2) The obstacles faced by
individuals after receiving the open selection
announcement; (3) the bureaucracy reformation
challenge that must be faced by Human Resource
Working Performance Management organisation
toward the new model of career counselling post
open selection program.
The study aims to reveal the negative impact of
the apprehensive situation among eselon III staff, as
a result of open selection program, by providing the
preventive action and solutions, and to reveal the
positive impact performed by the staff during the
open selection program, in order to give
development, and advance consolidation. This
evaluation study type had another objective to
describe the implementation of open selection
program from High Leader Position toward Banten
civil apparatus career.
2 THEORICAL FRAMEWORK
Staff always become an object for Human Resource
Management, Armstrong (2009), stated that “Human
resource management is a strategic, integrated and
coherent approach to the employment, development
and well-being of the people working in
organization”. Lutfim Cania (2014) stated that the
organisation working performances is more
important, especially in larger and more dynamic
market; human resource is the key to hold the
organisation in a very competitive market.
Evaluation is part of management system which
are planning, organisation, implementation,
monitoring, and evaluation. Without evaluation the
condition of the object will remain unknown within
the plans, implementation, and the result as well.
Scriven (1981) defines evaluation as a “The
process of determining the merit or worth or value of
something, or product of that process”, based on the
definition conducted by Scriven, Fitzpatrick,
Sanders and Worthen (2012) support the definition
of evaluation that it determines the use or
advantages of an object of evaluation. more general,
evaluation could be defined as process of
identification, clarification, and implementation the
evaluated object. it is also supported by Stufflebeam
and Coryn (2014) who defines evaluation as a
evaluating as the act or process of determining the
merit, worth, or significance of something or the
product of that process. Meanwhile, Evert Vedung
(2013) defines evaluation as a careful retrospective
assessment of the merit, worth and value of
administration, output and outcome of government
interventions, which is intended to play a role in
future, practical action situations. From all expert's
opinions above, it can be concluded that evaluation
is a systematic assessment process through planned
and coordinated actions toward the out pit of
government implementation in order to find the
effectiveness of a program that can be applied
during and after the program.
Mohammad Zohrabi (2011), in his article entitled
“An Introduction to course and/or Program
Evaluation”, he explained that in the early time, the
evaluation of a program is quantitative and/or
experimental action toward the nature. Within
several times, it is found that the qualitative
approach toward the nature become more effective
than artificial experiment in laboratory. The most
important issue during evaluations process is to
reveal the on going transformation.
The definition of evaluation impact, based on
Elliot Stern (2015), are : (1) Stresses the search for
any effects, not only those that are intended, (2)
Recognises that effects may be positive and